The Dupont operation Taylor was a part of was a covert effort to establish a resistance movement in Austria. 'Dupont' was a US special forces operation to parachute an Office of Strategic Services party into the Wiener-Neustadt area of Austria on an intelligence-gathering mission (13 October 1944/5...

Wow "Scott"! I remember you from 20 years ago on the internet! Thank you for the post. Explaining OD and everything else you said, I would probably have never known the answer had it not been for you. There was another question I had. "Revisionist" pointed out that I had the '1 ...

As I mentioned, after shaving I did not have time to put on my field jacket before being captured and was unfortunately caught in the old coat and trousers although my OD's were underneath. It was with great difficulty that I was permitted to bring along my jacket. What's an OD? Jack H. Taylor is c...

>> I'd be interested in what anyone who has other criticisms of the video has to add. << I watched it. The video was a pack of lies from start to finish. There was very little truth contained in the bullet points presented at all. Basically they just took some claims from postwar show-trials and sta...

Scott cites Fuchs: Sgt. Erich Fuchs installed a gasoline engine from a truck at Sobibor, and gives enough detail that engine type is definitely gasoline, but the story lacks other important details. Fuchs said a benzine engine. That doesn't automatically mean a gasoline engine. Check out >benzine e...

Mr. Frank never owned up to any professional rewriting; it was always presented as the verbatim diary of his daughter. Which it is basically is. He left out some passages that he considered to be too private. Anybody can check how verbatim the first editions are by consulting the Critical Edition. ...

I do not understand what problems the revisionists have with Anne Frank's diary. Does anybody deny that Jews tried to hide to escape deportation? James Barrington already noted: Perhaps Mr. Frank should have presented the book as " based on a true story," which it probably was. Mr. Frank never owne...

I have just noticed that Dr Mathis is using another forum to personally attack posters on this thread. ..... and to post abuse in relation to another thread on this forum. That is why we permit no links to that site. That site allows threats and supposed names, addresses, ph. nos. of those who post...

Sgt. Erich Fuchs installed a gasoline engine from a truck at Sobibor, and gives enough detail that engine type is definitely gasoline, but the story lacks other important details. Scott, in what ways is the story by sgt.Fuchs lacking in your opinion? For one thing Fuchs doesn't explain how he mount...

Taking a "gas can" instead of a "diesel can" to the engine is not very good evidence for engine type. In the case of Fuchs he provides additional details like repairing the ignition so that we are certain he talks about a gasoline (i.e., spark-ignition) engine, and not an oil (i.e., compression-igni...

Concerning Scott's forum, my posts there seem to be disappearing. Maybe I should re-post them on this forum too. It is true that I am not very kind to certain fanatic German anti-Germans. These people are in my eyes scum. Why don't these people get themselves Israeli passports, instead of travellin...

Carto's Cutlass Supreme wrote:The chutzpah of the holocaust liars is beyond anything ever seen. It's not enough to lie, one can go further by calling attention to oneself as the forgiver, thus gaining accolades in the media, and keeping it a media story.

That's quotable!

The Martin Broszat version is interesting because Broszat conveniently leaves out all Höß' frank discussions of homosexuals in the penal system. In my edition (Broszat) there is a long passage about a horny homosexual Rumanian prince with lots of pornographic tattoos (he would have made for interes...

The Martin Broszat version is interesting because Broszat conveniently leaves out all Höß' frank discussions of homosexuals in the penal system. Pray tell that in the Sixties one would "share the Shoah" with those guys. How times change.

What is this "memoir"? It certainly isn't the famous Hoess affidavit used at Nuremberg? Could it have been the "autobiography" Hoess wrote while under Polish communist control just before his execution? If so, what "scholars" would credit such a document? [...] Anyway, does anyone know where he got...