If the debate is simply on whether "the Holocaust" took place or not, regardless of what the proper noun "Holocaust" designates, it's obvious we have a guaranteed winner for the "yes" bunch. For instance, if this week's meaning of "the Holocaust" is, say, the...

ASMarques I didn't understand the point you are trying to make with your lengthy post. What I can say, however, is that no one is claiming that Ahmadinejad now represents, or should ever represent, revisionists and our arguments. Nonetheless, and given the limitations (and their impact on national a...

What is the last fallacy called? I believe it is called Holohoaxism. :roll: Ever noticed what "irrefutable" lines of arguments Holocaust believers pull out of their hats?! Irrefutable, because these lines are void of decent logic... The other one is:"Are you saying all these survivor...

It is just too funny that amongst those millions of documents, they did not find a single one proving homicidal gassings in Auschwitz. Yes.. When in dire need for 'evidence', the Big Book of Lies recommends urgent resort to claims like: "the Nazis talked about a "final solution" whic...

In case you did not know, Lipstadt has a weblog.

http://lipstadt.blogspot.com

It's a Judeo-supremacist blog, wherein pro-Israeli propaganda is posted among other things (including the alleged holocaust)

what a revisionist such as Hannover has to demonstrate somehow is that the Germans were not able to dispose thoroughly of victims disinterred from mass graves Sir, since it is YOU who claims that there is truth behind such absurdities, it is YOU who should demonstrate how or what the Germans did, a...

The word "Holocaust" (not in its current use to refer to the Jewish drama/hoax) was first used in the political sphere in the New York Times on Sept. 10, 1895, in the headline "Another Armenian Holocaust". As usual, the Jews have stolen the word, claimed it was coined by "them", fabricated a story, ...

9th and 10th on page 1 for me. 26th (page 3) for FPP.

the judeo-supremacists are not as smart as everyone thinks.

Could that also not imply that they are not smart enough to realise that this poll harms their interests and advances our position more than it does them good and us harm?

Do you really think that those who have been able to get Zundel in solitary confinement with no charges against him would not have the power to prevent the publicising of the results of such a poll?

http://www.acs-aec.ca/Polls/24-01-2005-1.pdf

There can be no doubt about Revisionists being heard. JTA New York, Monday, January 24, 2005 Poll: Some Canadians question Holocaust numbers [Since when is 1/6 simply some Canadians?] ONE in six Canadians believe fewer than 1 million Jews perished in the Holocaust, according to a new survey. The su...

Stalin was not as nasty to the jews as he was to Christians and other groups. He even allocated an autonomous region for them - Birobidzhan. Bigger than what today is "Israel".

Actually, Trojan, with regards to this: She spray-painted swastikas and claimed it was an anti-Semitic attack. That's not a "conspiracy", that's the truth. She was actually CAUGHT doing it. As for my other sentence about "lulling people to sleep", it was with regards to using a non-Jew as an example...

She reported to police and school officials that her car had been spray- painted with racial slurs and the tires slashed March 9 while she was on campus preparing a lecture for an anti-hate forum. She also reported the vandalism to her insurer, according to the prosecutor. She spray-painted swastik...

The guy was lucky evidence came in before he was put to death by the hateful, lying "Israelis". Eichmann wasn't that lucky.