Go ahead try it on your BBQ; sure meat will burn, but flop a raw steak on a burning steak without the hot charcoal and see what happens. you can easily burn a couple of corpses on the heat from the fat of the first so the above statement isn't in the slightest bit accurate.although i'll agree that ...

yes some of the pictures do look faked and i've no doubt that pictures and evidence was forged by the soviets but i see no real evidence to make claims that millions didnt die because a couple of corpses managed to hold on to their hats.

the photos prove nothing,except that 'Simon Wiesenthal' has a made a living out of shall we say 'bending the truth' and thats common knowledge.

i asked to see some faked pictures thats all, if hanover wants to go 'hunting' believers theres another forum he should try instead of trying to put words into my mouth

You then backed off when challenged to start threads on specifics if you so believed in the stories....which you certainly seem to. where in gods name did you come to that conclusion. and i said no,what im wondering is why people who claim to have lived through such things feel the reason to lie ab...

where have i said i was a 'believer' or are you just arguementative with everyone who asks a question,i'll know not to bother again

no,what im wondering is why people who claim to have lived through such things feel the reason to lie about it,im intrested in things that have been proved to be fraudulent

Do Photographs Prove the NS Extermination of the Jews?

im looking at the ability of people to lie about such things,not for proof of extermination techniques

i've only just started looking into the 'revisionists side to the discussion ' what i'd like to know is where can i find some examples of faked photos,etc etc. i've seen the painted in smoke picture and the piles of glasses and shoes [which seem to be on a sloped floor to give the appearence of more...

i read once that inmates testified to watching 'sondercommandos' pulling bodies from the gas chambers whilst laughing and smoking,i would have thought that smoking would be risky due to explosive fumes [but then im not an expert and may well be wrong]

but do the 'believers' agree that krema I wasn't a gas chamber or do they put it down to 'revisionism'?in which case was the magazine wrong in saying it wasn't and did it suffer in any way after the statement was printed?

can anyone answer these questions for me, in 1995 L'Express paper reported that krema 1 was not a gas chamber and was built in 1948 by polish communists for the 'tourists benefit' IS THIS generally accepted now or is it still classed as revisionism,i remember reading that in one chamber at auschwitz...