Did German Homicidal Gas Chambers Exist? - new John Wear article

[Lamprecht]

Inconvenient History has just published a new introductory article exposing the "homicidal gas chamber" hoax. It provides a nice summary of the forensic investigations of the camps (especially Auschwitz) and other major revisionist milestones.

Did German Homicidal Gas Chambers Exist?
By John Wear
Published: 2020-02-16

A relative of a prominent Holocaust revisionist recently said that the argument Holocaust supporters fear most is “the physical, chemical, topographical, architectural, and documentary evidence of the impossibility of the homicidal gas chamber.” She writes, “And, believe me, the only thing they fear is that people may learn that there were no homicidal gas chambers, and that Jews have lied about that particular point.”

This article discusses some of the evidence proving that there were no homicidal gas chambers in any of the German camps during World War II.
[...]

Did German Homicidal Gas Chambers Exist?
https://codoh.com/library/document/7200/

[Breker]

It rather appears that Mr. Wear has dipped into the wealth of information and persuasive talking points available at this esteemed forum and the CODOH general site.
The quite ridiculous gas chambers allegation? "It's all over but the shouting".
B.

[Hektor]

"This article discusses some of the evidence proving that there were no homicidal gas chambers in any of the German camps"
It's not feasible to prove that there were NO homicidal gas chambers in any German camp, unless you are a timelessly, omnipresent, omniscient being. The burden of proof is on the accusers to demonstrate that there actually were homicidal gas chambers in the camps they claim. If there evidence doesn't pass scrutiny, it needs to be rejected (Well, there is another reason to reject those claims and that's because due to persecution of Holocaust dissidents they can't insist on being scientific claims).

What Holocaust proponents do is to invert the burden of proof. They first insist that the Holocaust and its key claims are "recorded History" agreed upon by "all serious historians" and demand that Holocaust Revisionists have to prove that there were no gas chambers. Meanwhile it's sufficient to demonstrate that the prove supplied in support of homicidal gas chambers is dubious or worse.

[Lamprecht]

What Holocaust proponents do is to invert the burden of proof. They first insist that the Holocaust and its key claims are "recorded History" agreed upon by "all serious historians" and demand that Holocaust Revisionists have to prove that there were no gas chambers.

Indeed, they do love to invert the burden of proof. The reason typically used to justify it:
The "experts" have come to a unanimous agreement, so the burden of proof is on you to explain how they're wrong

This would be partly-valid in particular instances, but in the present situation it is not. That is because the supposed "consensus" is artificial since it is a legal requirement. In this respect, I have even seen people use the argument that court cases have taken "Judicial notice" of gassings as evidence that they occurred

What they prefer to do is invert the hierarchy of evidence. I explain this in my (rather long) post here at the bottom: viewtopic.php?p=95570#p95570

I have recently had the misfortune of "debating" a person whose strategy is just to cite "experts" making hard claims without supporting data, and then to complain if I don't accept everything their cherry-picked experts claim. The discussion isn't related to the big H but it nevertheless does show how some/many/most people think: whatever the perceived authority says, that must be true unless somehow you find a more "official" expert to say otherwise. The details or the science doesn't really matter.

[Hannover]

Hektor:

What Holocaust proponents do is to invert the burden of proof. They first insist that the Holocaust and its key claims are "recorded History" agreed upon by "all serious historians" and demand that Holocaust Revisionists have to prove that there were no gas chambers. Meanwhile it's sufficient to demonstrate that the prove supplied in support of homicidal gas chambers is dubious or worse.

Yet what they absurdly claim was scientifically, technically impossible.

"Serious historians" are merely those who are said to be "serious" by those who are committed to the fake storyline. Someone who believes in witchcraft no doubt feels that others who believe in witchcraft are "serious".

The proof that there were no alleged 'gas chambers' is simple, they could not have existed as alleged.

Considering that a total of 4,000,000 Jews and millions of 'others are claimed to have been gassed is matched by the equally laughable claim that their remains exist in known locations, which in fact do not exist.

Remember, at Nuremberg it was accepted that Jews were mass murdered in steam chambers.

The alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewed and demolished here.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11143&p=83723&hilit=model+asmarques#p83723

‘O, what a tangled web they weave when first they practise to deceive’.

- Hannover