E. Hunt's "Treblinka Archaeology Hoax" Video / READY TO VIEW

[ganglere]

Good evening ladies and gentlemen!

This was definetly the best video of late, as it directly confronts ms Colls and her "investigation"
I have followed this for a while, and I must conclude that it has gone from bad to worse.

I absolutely object to her even calling herself a scientist.

"I find forty-some bones, therefore I have found a mass-grave"
" I find some tiles, therefore I have discovered a gas-chamber"

OH PLEASE!!

How anyone with even a rudimentary analytical ability can fall for that is beyond me.

Humbly yours,

Ganglere

[Charles Traynor]

No way to download this from Youtube. It stops before ending.
Please put a reduced file version on archive.org because the HD 4.4 GB file takes hours to be downloaded.

This video is already banned in the country where I currently reside. I tried downloading it from YouTube through a proxy server yesterday and the download kept failing just before the end for me too.

This is definitely Eric Hunt's best film to date and seems destined to become a revisionist classic like the old David McCalden Auschwitz documentaries from the 80s. Constructive criticism: I agree with earlier comments about there being too much bouncing around between Majdanek, Treblinka and Dachau. The narration was good for the most part but every now and again I did sense a little animosity towards the Jew creeping into Mr. Hunt's commentary.


[Edit: corrected the decade McCalden's documentaries were filmed from 90s to 80s.]

[JackBQuick]

Thank you heartily Eric Hunt for another fantastic work. All the best to you!

[Dresden]

JackBQuick said:

"Thank you heartily Eric Hunt for another fantastic work. All the best to you!"

I second that

Thank you Eric Hunt for another great video.....maybe the best so far!

[Kingfisher]

I agree with those who have commented that the long central section on Majdanek distracts from the Treblinka theme and on the second viewing I found myself getting irritated and wishing they would get back to Treblinka. I'd suggest this section be cut heavily, keeping only what is relevant to Treblinka. The material would not be wasted: it is valuable and can be used in another, later film. The resulting , shorter film would correspond better to most people's attention span.

None of the (I hope) constructive criticism above detracts from the fact that this is a remarkable film. Congratulations to all involved.
[edited for typo]

[Scotsman]

I've watched part of it, and I will have to repeat the same criticism of others -

Eric Hunt's tone is more restrained like his second video, but throughout what I have seen he has a condescending tone that gives off a bad impression. And the clever intro could do without the 'Jew naming'. I appreciate Jew Naming like any other, but the reason denierbud's films were so effective (beyond the facts presented) is that they were careful, restrained, and actually quite fair. You could show the films to anyone without them seeming over the top, and to this day they still have a good reputation.

Though I must say, I was much more critical of Eric Hunt's first video. His tone was so over the top (downright hysterical), not to mention the unnecessary open anti-Christianity in his narration, that I would not show it to friends.

[cold beer]

The narration was good for the most part but every now and again I did sense a little animosity towards the Jew creeping into Mr. Hunt's commentary.

So what?

[cold beer]

I agree with those who have commented that the long central section on Majdanek distracts from the Treblinka theme and on the second viewing I found myself getting irritated and wishing they would get back to Treblinka. I'd suggest this section be cut heavily, keeping only what is relevant to Treblinka. The material would not be wasted: it is valuable and can be used in another, later film. The resulting , shorter film would correspond better two most people's attention span.

I watched the video a second time too and now have a different perspective.
He has to address the claims they made in the Study Coll's documentary.
If not the viewer might interpret the omission on Eric Hunt's part as conceding that the claims made in Colls' Treblinka documentary, about Majdanek, are factual.

[Scotsman]

The narration was good for the most part but every now and again I did sense a little animosity towards the Jew creeping into Mr. Hunt's commentary.

So what?

The point is, or so I thought, to enlighten outsiders, not to preach to the crowd. Right or wrong, when an outsider sees instant Jew Naming at the start of a video, his first impression is probably going to be - "ah, so the ADL was right. Holocaust Deniers are neo-nazis".

[borjastick]

Charles, I too live in a country where this is banned. However, I watched it without problem using www.expatshield.com.

[HeiligeSturm]

Katyn forest was the scene of the murder of thousands of Polish officers by the Soviet Union. It was falsely accepted into the Nuremberg records that it was the Germans who were responsible for this slaughter. There were 'documents', 'eyewitnesses, 'confessions', executions of Germans; all of which allegedly attested to German guilt.

Well Communist party of Great Britain still believe and claim that Katyn massacre was conducted by Germans. (http://www.cpgb-ml.org/index.php?secName=leaflets&subName=display&leafletId=60) Originally found at: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.be/2014/01/communists-still-in-denial-over-katyn.html.

Hitler was excavating and cremating corpses at Treblinka during the exact same months when he was excavating and exposing corpses at Katyn. The story of the corpses allegedly exhumed and cremated at Treblinka was in fact Stalin's propagandistic response to Hitler's propagandistic exposure of the Polish POW's executed by Stalin at Katyn.......

Hitler was excavating cremating corpses at Treblinka?

Another example that came to my mind was the alleged "Operation Harvest Festival" (or "Aktion Erntefest") at Majdanek. Many inhabitants of Lublin had a full view of the interior of the Majdanek camp from their homes. But we are supposed to believe that the Nazis machine-gunned many Jews at Majdanek with loud music supposed to cover the sounds of the massacre. Ridiculous...

Wagner I believe.

Constructive criticism: I agree with earlier comments about there being too much bouncing around between Majdanek, Treblinka and Dachau.

If you have watched any mainstream documentaries - this is exactly what is done.
For example if you watch Auschwitz - The Nazis and The 'Final Solution' they bounce around from Kristallnacht to Canal Islands to Dachau to Auschwitz to Treblinka and Majdanek... Maybe it should be titled Auschwitz all around or Auschwitz all over Europe.

But back to Eric's work.
It is important to expose those "archaeologists" and their methods of doing documentary. All the hand close ups... everything.
Sturdy-Colls and her "Oh my God!" lines are obviously false and (like Eric pointed out very well) all other things are staged too to
get emotional effects from viewers on the cost of reason.
It's like every bone found has to be from Jewish Concentration Death Camp victim.
Sturdy-Colls is young and appeals to new generation of believers. Her "Bold and Beautiful emotions" could divide opinions.

I think that Sturdy Colls is the best that had happened to revisionism in many years...

I agree. This is supposed to be the new hope for proving that there is mass graves at Treblinka and she's doing great work...
proving just the opposite.

[hermod]

Hitler was excavating and cremating corpses at Treblinka during the exact same months when he was excavating and exposing corpses at Katyn. The story of the corpses allegedly exhumed and cremated at Treblinka was in fact Stalin's propagandistic response to Hitler's propagandistic exposure of the Polish POW's executed by Stalin at Katyn.......

Hitler was excavating cremating corpses at Treblinka?

I wrote that Hitler was excavating and cremating corpses at Treblinka "according to the Holocaust narrative and Comrade Stalin". I, of course, didn't mean that Hitler was doing it himself. I meant that Hitler's men were allegedly doing that job on Hitler's order. Was that unclear?

Another example that came to my mind was the alleged "Operation Harvest Festival" (or "Aktion Erntefest") at Majdanek. Many inhabitants of Lublin had a full view of the interior of the Majdanek camp from their homes. But we are supposed to believe that the Nazis machine-gunned many Jews at Majdanek with loud music supposed to cover the sounds of the massacre. Ridiculous...

Wagner I believe.

What else for a Wagnerian holocaust as the cartoonish founding myth of Zionists' ethnostate?

[Dresden]

Charles Traynor wrote:

"Constructive criticism: I agree with earlier comments about there being too much bouncing around between Majdanek, Treblinka and Dachau"

HeiligeSturm said:

"If you have watched any mainstream documentaries - this is exactly what is done.
For example if you watch Auschwitz - The Nazis and The 'Final Solution' they bounce around from Kristallnacht to Canal Islands to Dachau to Auschwitz to Treblinka and Majdanek... Maybe it should be titled Auschwitz all around or Auschwitz all over Europe"

They do that to confuse.
That's the very reason Revisionists should not do it; because we want to educate, not confuse.

[-JFK-]

First off, thank you borjastick for the link to expatshield, looking for good proxy servers is such a hassle, this one was quick and easy.

This is the best revisionist video I've seen to date, and I must shamefully admit that I've seen far more revisionist videos than I've read revisionist books.

It's quite funny how that dutch guy with the black cap pulls out the 'almost complete' tile fragment from the virgin earth knowing what symbol he will find on it's underside... (I know my dutch accents being dutch myself, there's quite a few dutch people on her crew I noticed, which is not that strange being such a heavilly indoctrinated people on the subject as we are)
I find Colls's following reasoning that embellishing a 'murder chamber' with stars of david so the jews (of which many are supposed to have suspected the so called murderous intent beforehand) would more readilly enter it voluntarilly, to be utterly ridiculous.
The Sturdy Colls documentary is obviously heavilly staged, I had trouble keeping down my lunch watching those 'heartrending' scenes. (I had to grin for some time when several moments later in the video, after I had written the above text Eric commented on the exact same things)

The criticism in the above posts may be meant well, but I don't see any of it, I think Eric's voice is quite pleasant as well (when he's using the right microphone), we can't all be David Attenborough.
The subjects treated where all direct responses to the CSC cartoon, no diversionary tactics at all as far as I can see.

Anyway, good job Eric may you make many more, I'll watch each and every one of them and when the right one comes along I'll show it to all my friends and relatives. (this one, in my opinion, is for those that have already made the first baby steps or might already have some aversion towards zionists)
Just a little heads up, you mispronounced 'reines juden fett' as 'reichs juden fett'.


'She found a shark's tooth', LOL, good job Caroline.
She is cute though, with her light orkney accent and all...

[Hannover]

I found the tone of the narration to be fine. In fact I rather enjoyed the occasional bite.
The moving back & forth from one site to another was not difficult for me to follow, but then I'm well versed on the specifics which probably made it easier. With a few minor narration inserts this could easily be remedied.

All told, this video demolishes the absurd impossibilities of the Treblinka lie. Another nail in the 'holocaust' coffin.

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who debunk it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent racist Jewish supremacists demand that there be no open debate.

The tide is turning. What are you doing to assist?

- Hannover