lack of cyanide residue in alleged 'gas chambers'

[Hannover]

Master chemist, Germar Rudolf, on the alleged gas chambers:

In order to kill all victims in a few minutes as told by the 'witnesses', we assume that the Zyklon B must have released enough HCN to reach an average concentration of 10g/m3 after 10 minutes....the minimum amount of Zyklon B used in the alleged chambers would have been TEN times the amount normally used for delousing

So called 'eyewitnesses' allege death in 5-10 minutes which would mean massive amounts and massive residue in the alleged gas chambers...BUT....there's only microscopic residue (from infrequent delousing) at these sites, yet utterly massive amounts of residue in the acknowledged delousing facilities.

see: part C. - Chemical Analysis of Brick and Mortar Samples, sec.4 of:
'Critique of Claims Made by Robert Jan Van Pelt':
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/GR/RudolfOnVanPelt.html

In fact, this entire critique by Rudolf is highly recommended.

- Hannover

[Hannover]

Here are a few points to remember when contemplating the allegations of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz:

- 500,000 people were allegedly gassed in Krema II alone, but there is scant cyanide residue, indicating only occasional delousing. There is no evidence for 'washing the gas chambers', and it would take quite a long time to move the alleged numbers per gassing to do the 'washing', mandating heavy residue...which there isn't.

- Gassings were said to be frequent, meaning build up of cyanide residue. Regardless of the later alleged airing out, the cyanide in contact with the walls remains in contact with the walls. We then have the next alleged gassing, the next, the next etc., adding to it. But, we have only scant cyanide residue, which points to occasional delousing.

- So called 'eyewitness' Daniel Bennahmias claimed the alleged gas chambers walls were PAINTED after each gassing. Well, even if true, that would simply 'lock in' the HCN in the mortar and concrete. There is no cyanide residue to be found which would indicate mass gassings as alleged.

Hannover

[Sailor]

So called 'eyewitness' Daniel Bennahmias claimed the alleged gas chambers walls were PAINTED after each gassing.

Krema II with morgue 1, the alleged gas chamber, was in operation from spring 1943 to fall 1944. That is over 500 days, and with one gassing per day, why, that would add up to over 500 coats of paint being slopped on.
The pictures which I have seen of the inside of the morgue don’t show a trace of paint on the walls or the ceiling! The morgue ceiling still shows the concrete imprint marks of the wood forming when the concrete was poured. But no paint.
So I wonder whether 'eyewitness' Daniel Bennahmias didn’t dream this all up?

[TMoran]

Sailor noted:
'Krema II with morgue 1, the alleged gas chamber, was in operation from spring 1943 to fall 1944. That is over 500 days, and with one gassing per day, why, that would add up to over 500 coats of paint being slopped on.'

Excellent point. What they would need now is some testimony that would tell us they would every now and then scrap to walls off.

Sailor also made this excellent observation:
'The pictures which I have seen of the inside of the morgue don’t show a trace of paint on the walls or the ceiling! The morgue ceiling still shows the concrete imprint marks of the wood forming when the concrete was poured. But no paint.'

Excellent observation Sailor. Typically there is always something to toss a monkey wrench into Holocaust 'facts'. The existing crema ruins show no coating. How utterly absolute can you get?

Another monkey wrench would be the considerable patchy blue stains that are on the walls of the alleged gas chamber at Majdanek.

If blue stains at Majdanek why not Auschwitz? Or, inversely, if no blue stains at Auschwitz then why at Majdanek?

In a recent exchange on the same subject on another format a noted Holocaust defender proposed that maybe the blue stains were painted on. Prussian Blue is made into paint and is used by artist. The desperate Holocaust defender didn't return to answer a question about why they would have painted on Prussian Blue.

Generally Holocaust defenders will explain the real Prussian Blue deposits on fumigation facilities at Auschwitz by saying the concentrations of HCN were higher and duration of applications were longer.

The same fore mentioned person also proposed as an alternate explanation that they would wash out the chambers at Majdanek too but they didn't do it for the last gassing and that could be why there are blue stains on the wall.

Of course that would be telling us that Prussian Blue formed just from one gassing.

[Hannover]

Consequently, we know that what's alleged to be a gas chamber at Majdanek is a fumigation facility and what's alleged to be a gas chamber at Auschwitz is a morgue.

Since the beneficiaries have lied, they must continue to lie....what a trap be be in. The only option for the liars (other than admitting to lying) is to insist upon imprisoning those who expose their irrational nonsense.

- Hannover

[Scott]

Is the "recreated" gaschamber at Krema I shown to tourists stained blue? It appears so from photographs.