typical Nizkor phoney 'holocaust' photo

[Vallon]

I bet no revisionists has ever been allowed access to the negatives, all the grand titles and labels you attach to things to add an air of validity, but it's all wind and piss at the end of the day.

The negatives are supposed to be lost. There seem to be two sets of original contact prints.

The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:

[Richard Perle]

The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:

Changed from what to what? Does the square format conclusion contradict something?

[Hannover]

Interesting that the first two photos show no 'window frame' like the last two. In fact they show no relationship to the last two whatsoever. They appear to be an attempt at creating a dramatic, secretive, in-a-hurry appearance.

And, the very first photo appears to have been taken directly below a tree. Not possible if we accept the 'inside a building, through a window' presentation of the last two.

Ofcourse, this is all rather moot in lieu of the spaghetti legs of the 'corpses' that show up clearly when enlarged.

A complete fraud.

- Hannover

[Vallon]

The story on the camera is changing, it seems.
A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:

Changed from what to what? Does the square format conclusion contradict something?

Pressac wrote that he published the complete photographs, not just the "interesting part":
http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Page%20Scans/Page422.htm

[Hannover]

Vallon:

- Why are there no physical remains?
- Where are the necessary ashes?
- Where are the bones?
- The standard storyline says that human fat was scooped upon the corpses for fuel. Do you believe that?
- Where are the indications of pits of the size that are alleged?
- Why hasn't the 'holocau$t' Industry authorized verifiable excavations of the alleged sites?

Hannover

[code yellow]

According to Udo Walendy, if you look at the very first photo in this thread, the bodies and other manipulations are drawn, like a sketch, then a photo is taken which gives the images in the photo a more realistic looking affect. I have not seen a close up version of this photo yet, which would probably give the hoax away. Why is the picture being taken from such a distance?

[Goethe]

I have not seen a close up version of this photo yet, which would probably give the hoax away. Why is the picture being taken from such a distance?

The photo was not taken, it was made.

Here's a close-up, a dead give away for sure:

[Turpitz]

The negatives are supposed to be lost.

I could have told you it would come to this obvious conclusion in the first line of the first page of the thread.

A photoenthusiast cut and glued and pasted, and concludes that the negatives had a square format:

And how could anyone believe they are forgeries after seeing that?

[Hannover]

Notice how these are called 'negatives'; they aren't negatives:

http://w3.msi.vxu.se/users/pku/Historia ... PolResist_negstrip.png


And there's the silly color added in order to give it an aura of credibility.

Revisionists have the 'holocau$t' scam by the throat and aren't letting go.

- Hannover

[Vallon]

I agree with Moderator #3 that the discussion is better continued in this thread.

On the Auschwitz-museum site I found a version of the photograph with the pile of bodies with good contrast:

http://www.auschwitz-muzeum.oswiecim.pl ... lanie.html

The spaghetti-photo seems retouched, to make some features in the photograph into the body of a women, with legs, knees, a breast, a face, and hair. Little of that can be discerned in the original. According to Walendy, this picture comes from Schoenberner, "The Yellow Star".

Schoenberner's book has been analyzed and critized in Cornelia Brink's Ikonen der Vernichting. I do not know if this picture was discussed, or if Walendy was given credit there. I can try to borrow the book.

[Scott]

In the above photo posted by Vallon the retouching makes it appear that the guy to the left in the group at the right is carrying a gasmask in his right hand. If so it is a mask huge enough for a horse!

[Bergmann]

Burning human fat produces black smoke, similar to burning oil (Remember the burning oil fields in Kuweit). Ask any fire fighter.

What comes geyser like out of the earth in above pictures looks to me more like condensed water steam.

[Hektor]

Burning human fat produces black smoke, similar to burning oil (Remember the burning oil fields in Kuweit). Ask any fire fighter.

What comes geyser like out of the earth in above pictures looks to me more like condensed water steam.

Are you sure about this(black smoke)? Do you have references for this? Is the smoke not supposed to come from the fuel/wood/coal used for making the fire?

[Hannover]

Yet, forum participants such as 'Hans' claims these fakes are proof of the 'holocaust' storyline. See his recent post here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6160&p=43513

This is too easy.

- Hannover

[JustTheTruth]

What about the super-long body lying right at the front-center?

They sure are some LONG legs....