The more interesting, and older topics, are getting 2,000 and 3,000 hits plus. The forum supposedly has 300 members and 25 are active - this means that google has picked up the topics and this is becoming an historical research area.
You can rest assured that various jewish organizations are going to be keeping a closer eye on this place.
The growth of this forum can't be ignored
Moderator: Moderator
Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
-
Mark_Twain
- Valued contributor
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:08 pm
-
Moderator3
- Moderator
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 4:01 am
Thanks. We realize we're getting a big increase in traffic, those prying eyes are to be expected. We welcome the attention. The more, the better.
It's our opinion that we now have the most informed and articulate Revisionist crew around. We gladly take on all serious inquiries and debators. To affirm our status, let us simply state that we now get emails from some of the biggest names in Revisionism; inquiries and requests for opinions. We are flattered.
Of late we've seen a lot of attempts to disrupt TRF by various methods. Unfortunately, it goes with the territory and is a sign of success. We're here to stay.
M3
It's our opinion that we now have the most informed and articulate Revisionist crew around. We gladly take on all serious inquiries and debators. To affirm our status, let us simply state that we now get emails from some of the biggest names in Revisionism; inquiries and requests for opinions. We are flattered.
Of late we've seen a lot of attempts to disrupt TRF by various methods. Unfortunately, it goes with the territory and is a sign of success. We're here to stay.
M3
-
Richard Perle
- Valuable asset
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:45 am
Are you able to tell us more about who those big names are?
There are usually around 5 guests at a time visible viewing the forums. Is there any way to tell where they are from and inform us if people are visiting from any interesting places? Some sites list government domains and such things to show who's attention they have. Obviously if this information betrays privacy then you can't spread it around.
There are usually around 5 guests at a time visible viewing the forums. Is there any way to tell where they are from and inform us if people are visiting from any interesting places? Some sites list government domains and such things to show who's attention they have. Obviously if this information betrays privacy then you can't spread it around.
-
Carto's Cutlass Supreme
- Valuable asset
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
- Location: Northern California
Maybe the installation of a counter would be a good idea?
Here are two good services:
http://www.nedstatbasic.net/
http://www.extreme-dm.com/tracking/
Those are the best ones I know of.
-haldan
Here are two good services:
http://www.nedstatbasic.net/
http://www.extreme-dm.com/tracking/
Those are the best ones I know of.
-haldan
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan
Homage to Catalin Haldan
Haldan wrote:Maybe the installation of a counter would be a good idea?
Here are two good services:
http://www.nedstatbasic.net/
http://www.extreme-dm.com/tracking/
Those are the best ones I know of.
-haldan
Haldan, please note on index-page:
Our articles have been viewed 1277770 times
Thanks for the tip.
-
Richard Perle
- Valuable asset
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:45 am
-
Barrington James
- Valued contributor
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:26 pm
I think the mandate of the forum should be enlarged because it is difficult to understand any part of history in isolation. The general public would understand the “holocaust” much better if they knew why it is so important to the powerful forces that created it, perpetuate, and enforce it. It would also be useful to know of other such hoaxes that are presently being manufactured daily. We need to not only destroy the myth of the holocaust and other such myths but to make people aware of the ways we are controlled daily by the people who rule this world.
You can fool too many of the people most of the time.
-
Mark_Twain
- Valued contributor
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:08 pm
Barrington James wrote:I think the mandate of the forum should be enlarged because it is difficult to understand any part of history in isolation. The general public would understand the “holocaust” much better if they knew why it is so important to the powerful forces that created it, perpetuate, and enforce it. It would also be useful to know of other such hoaxes that are presently being manufactured daily. We need to not only destroy the myth of the holocaust and other such myths but to make people aware of the ways we are controlled daily by the people who rule this world.
If the forum was expanded to include such topics, then I for one would stay away, this isn't a conspiracy theory website or one that should include anti-Israel rhetoric.
Revisionism should (and mostly has so far) be tightly disciplined and keep it's target solely as disproving, piece by ridiculous piece of the big lie.
simon1003 wrote:If the forum was expanded to include such topics, then I for one would stay away, this isn't a conspiracy theory website or one that should include anti-Israel rhetoric.
Revisionism should (and mostly has so far) be tightly disciplined and keep it's target solely as disproving, piece by ridiculous piece of the big lie.
I agree 100%. This forum should only focus on one thing, namely the so-called 'Holocaust'.
-
Carto's Cutlass Supreme
- Valuable asset
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:42 am
- Location: Northern California
Is total users online including only registered members?
On third party counters: you'd have to be careful that they couldn't have access to our IP's.
On Barrington's idea of broadening the scope: Leave a good thing alone. It's growing by being just like it is. Yes, it's part of a bigger picture but that bigger picture is open to interpretation and can't be included here. That's what I think anyway.
The highest record of 146 users online simultaneously was a spike due to the Auschwitz documentary shown on t.v. That shows how dwarfed we are. We get a mild residual off of their huge propaganda lies, shown to millions..
It could be all the discussion we're doing now could be valuable 5-15 years from now. That's why backing up the database on different computers, and even in different physical spaces (so a fire couldn't destroy the original and the backup) is so important. But I'm sure the webmaster has that covered.
Our google web presence is huge. Anyone ever getting into holocaust details on the internet is going to come across us quickly.
On third party counters: you'd have to be careful that they couldn't have access to our IP's.
On Barrington's idea of broadening the scope: Leave a good thing alone. It's growing by being just like it is. Yes, it's part of a bigger picture but that bigger picture is open to interpretation and can't be included here. That's what I think anyway.
The highest record of 146 users online simultaneously was a spike due to the Auschwitz documentary shown on t.v. That shows how dwarfed we are. We get a mild residual off of their huge propaganda lies, shown to millions..
It could be all the discussion we're doing now could be valuable 5-15 years from now. That's why backing up the database on different computers, and even in different physical spaces (so a fire couldn't destroy the original and the backup) is so important. But I'm sure the webmaster has that covered.
Our google web presence is huge. Anyone ever getting into holocaust details on the internet is going to come across us quickly.
-
Richard Perle
- Valuable asset
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:45 am
The total users online must include guests.
About expanding, I have brought up the topic before. I think it would be good to cover the world wars, just as IHR does. There's no shortage of WW2 revisionist work out there of the same high quality that there is for the holocaust, and I've found reading it has increased my understanding of how and why the holocaust lie came into being.
Current thread view count: 1278110
About expanding, I have brought up the topic before. I think it would be good to cover the world wars, just as IHR does. There's no shortage of WW2 revisionist work out there of the same high quality that there is for the holocaust, and I've found reading it has increased my understanding of how and why the holocaust lie came into being.
Current thread view count: 1278110
I agree with Barrington. Butz called it a the hoax. Because it is a hoax. I think we have to adress the "hoax". And in order to do that we cannot restrict ourselves to endless discussions on isolated technical details of the non-existent gaschambers.
I am aware of the difficulties when broaden the scope, with threads going of topic etc.
Perhaps we could have two sections? One more technical oriented and one more context oriented?
I am aware of the difficulties when broaden the scope, with threads going of topic etc.
Perhaps we could have two sections? One more technical oriented and one more context oriented?
Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
