Now Google gets the blame for holocaust denial.

[borjastick]

Hah you couldn't make it up. In the lame attempt to raise the holocaust subject again the storytellers blame Google and its algorithm and systems for the rise of holocaust denial websites and their supporters. They could have applied this theory to many other dodgy subjects like global warming. religion, Trump.

Here's the article and then below my response copied before they delete it.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... t-89241751

borjastick
9m ago
0 1

The problem for the jews and those who promote the holocaust as genuine history is the gate keeping and legal pressure used to maintain the story.

We are told of tens of thousands of young British soldiers killed in just days on the Somme etc in WW1 and no one disbelieves it, why? Probably because there isn't much to go on when questioning it.

The issue for the holocaust is that without doing much research it is easy to arrive at the conclusion that there were never six million under German control and thus couldn't have been killed. Then we look at the science of it all. The internet has given voice to those who have diligently analysed the scene of the alleged crimes and found it wanting. Whether right wing, left wing, denier or honest revisionist the evidence simply doesn't support the claims of mass murder by gas chamber in a state sponsored/ordered systematic eradication of europe's jews. Don't blame Google for that, blame science.

STOP PRESS!
By the time I had written this post my comment had been removed.

[Atigun]

The Guardian just published an article demanding that the entire internet be censored for content. Did you really think that they would allow a dissenting opinion? The blond bimbo who scratched out that screed and the people who she works for have about as much use for free speech as a pig has for grand opera. Newspapers and TV news no longer control the narrative and have become dinosaurs, dying breeds, but they're not going down without a fight. Censorship of the internet is, of course, the object they must achieve in order to stay relevant and in business. I take it that you were simply conducting an experiment. Nobody with two brain cells to rub together actually reads such trash as main stream newspapers for content anymore.

[madhatter]

I had the Nordhausen - epitome of the big lie video deleted on the Guardian, Daily Mail and Daily Express comment sites.
Rather amusing that the Comment is free facts are sacred mantra at the Graun is not upheld.

It makes me ask if there is a rightwing/leftwing press.

[Nessie..]

The article is pointing out how unbalanced certain searches are. It gives examples of

" Type this into your Google search bar: “did the hol”. And Google suggests you search for this: “Did the Holocaust happen?” And this is the answer: no. The top result is a link to stormfront.org, a neo-Nazi site and an article entitled: “Top 10 reasons why the Holocaust didn’t happen”. The third result is the article “The Holocaust Hoax; IT NEVER HAPPENED”. The fifth is “50 reasons why the Holocaust didn’t happen.” The seventh is a YouTube video “Did the Holocaust really happen?” The ninth is “Holocaust Against Jews is a Total Lie – Proof.”

and

"...such as the autocomplete suggestion that “jews are evil”, with eight of its 10 top results confirming they are..."

I can understand why you guys are happy with such results. The article is not calling for censorship, it is calling on google to stop one version of events, a version riddled with hate and lacking in evidence being promoted over all of the rest.

[Turpitz]

Queen Lizzie has just signed off the 'The Investigatory Powers Bill' in Britain. Unelected, peado-protecting, Sharia-May cannot contain her glee. Spying on the populace, like they do in banana republics and police states, makes her day. Queen Lizzie loves her subjects and cares greatly for them. Why, she's always standing up for the British people and their basic freedoms. Hardly a whisper from anyone concerning the matter; did you seriously expect there to be?

[Turpitz]

It makes me ask if there is a rightwing/leftwing press.

Seriously! Do you still uphold that belief? I realised the only media was a Jewish one about six-million years ago. Even shitty-rags like The Express are just rubbing the gormless Goy's faces in it everyday.


Nessie, reading your post it seems you are still using one of those lefty keyboards from the mid 1990s.




If I don't get called a Nazi at last twice a day, I can be sure I'm doing something wrong.

[Nessie..]

The google results show the Jews are clearly not as influential as many denialists claim. I did a search of "did the hol" as suggested by the article and CODOH came third, above Wikipedia and the BBC. The majority of returns were to sites which say "no" the Holocaust did not happen.

[borjastick]

Nessie complete avoids one or two of the replies to the article that pointed out that had she googled the Holocaust it would have brought up a completely different set of links. It's another way of the holocaust storytellers trying to get control of the internet and censor it so as to keep any truth and criticism of their hoax from the young and innocent.

This woman was able to say 'oooh look holocaust denial is all over the interweb so we must ban it and stop such awful people having their say.'

As to the other comments above about there being no left and right wing press in the UK I totally disagree. Read the Express or Mail about Brexit or mass immigration into Europe and then read the Guardian and you'll see the difference is very real. Where the media concur is over stories concerning jews, israel, holocaust, mainly because they are either owned by jews or are simply too scared to tell the truth.

[Nessie..]

Nessie complete avoids one or two of the replies to the article that pointed out that had she googled the Holocaust it would have brought up a completely different set of links.

I said "The article is pointing out how unbalanced certain searches are" which acknowledges other searches, such just searching under "Holocaust".

[Atigun]

Nessie complete avoids one or two of the replies to the article that pointed out that had she googled the Holocaust it would have brought up a completely different set of links.

I said "The article is pointing out how unbalanced certain searches are" which acknowledges other searches, such just searching under "Holocaust".

Yep, Nessie is pointing out that certain searches shouldn't be allowed on the internet. People might get the "wrong" idea about "certain things."

[hermod]

The article is not calling for censorship, it is calling on google to stop one version of events, a version riddled with hate and lacking in evidence being promoted over all of the rest.

This is what we all call for, Nessie !!




Edit: Oops. I've just realized that you were not referring to the orthodox/exterminationist state-sponsored narrative as I thought. It's quite a shame because that was the best definition of the orthodox Holocaust narrative I had ever read. By far...

[hermod]

In the lame attempt to raise the holocaust subject again the storytellers blame Google and its algorithm and systems for the rise of holocaust denial websites and their supporters. .

They should blame Google and its algorithm for that. TayTweets, Microsoft A.I. chatbot, needed less than 24 hours to understand that the 'Holocaust' "was made up" after all. Cyber-revisionist TayTweets was even euthanized (deactivated) because of that. I wonder why they didn't just reprogram (brainwash) him by exiling him for some time on Yad Vashem's website.



The main problem of Holohoaxers with artificial intelligence is the fact that A.I. computers do not yet respond to emotional appeals, their main tool to turn off people's rational brain...

[cold beer]

Nessie, reading your post it seems you are still using one of those lefty keyboards from the mid 1990s.

Oh a hasbarat keyboard!

[Nessie..]

Nessie complete avoids one or two of the replies to the article that pointed out that had she googled the Holocaust it would have brought up a completely different set of links.

I said "The article is pointing out how unbalanced certain searches are" which acknowledges other searches, such just searching under "Holocaust".

Yep, Nessie is pointing out that certain searches shouldn't be allowed on the internet. People might get the "wrong" idea about "certain things."

I did not say those searches should not be allowed.

[hermod]

They should blame Google and its algorithm for that.

Edit They shouldn't blame Google...