name a specific "holocaust" topic censored / banned here

[Atigun]

Atigun:
Your reply to Hannover in this thread Cyanide Chemistry at Auschwitz was certainly off topic and offensive on a personal level. It had nothing to do with your lighthearted response which is in fact available to read above, BTW. When we see such behavior caution is exercised in order to prevent spam. You are welcomed here like everyone who abides by our basic guidelines. You can now post again without a spam check. Again no 'holocaust' related topic has been banned or censored at this forum.

you said:

To err is human. To err as a moderator on a website is not only unforgivable but will haunt you for the rest of your life. You must now bear the mark of the scarlet letter.

Indeed, this job is not for everyone. I'm sure I'll rot in Jewish hell, or be assassinated by a JDL type.
Cheers, M1

In my initial post on the "Cyanide at..." post I stated that my post was off topic. IOW, I was aware that my post was off-topic and would have no objection to a moderator deleting it or limiting the replies to my off topic post. I was simply seeking some technical expertise on a different but related topic of characteristics of Zyklon-B and cyanide. Hannover's reply was completely unrelated to my question. I meant no insult (note the LOL) in my response, only that it was wide of the mark. I simply pointed out that your answer had no relation to the outgassing characteristics of Zyklon-B.

[Moderator]

In my initial post on the "Cyanide at..." post I stated that my post was off topic. IOW, I was aware that my post was off-topic and would have no objection to a moderator deleting it or limiting the replies to my off topic post. I was simply seeking some technical expertise on a different but related topic of characteristics of Zyklon-B and cyanide. Hannover's reply was completely unrelated to my question. I meant no insult (note the LOL) in my response, only that it was wide of the mark. I simply pointed out that your answer had no relation to the outgassing characteristics of Zyklon-B.

You said in that thread:

I had asked what had been done with the leftover Zyklon-B when it was removed from the Kula columns in the Auschwitz gas chambers. I was told that, due to it's distance to other buildings it was simply dumped at the "southern end" of the gas chambers and the cyanide simply dispersed.

And Hannover stated:

Ask them to give proof that cyanide gas is ineffective at 20 meters. The supposed withdrawn Zyklon-B would be emitting it's cyanide load for hours in the wind. And Zyklon-B insecticide was used in large buildings much larger that 20 meters.
Remember, the alleged batch-after-batch of waiting Jews were outside right next to the alleged 'gas chambers' door.

Hanover also replied with an admittedly long response, excerpt:

That is a typically desperate reply. "Simply dispersed" means it would have have gassed anyone in a broad area, the distance to other buildings was not far at all, AND supposedly there was a 'next batch' of Jews waiting just outside.

He also said:

The Zyklon-B pesticide granules took/take hours to complete the outgassing of their cyanide load. The storyline says that this same SS man on the roof, supposedly wearing a highly visible gas mask, withdrew the container up from the 'gas chambers' in just minutes, again he would have been highly visible by the alleged next batch of Jews.

Remember, the Zyklon-B pesticide granules were allegedly dumped lowered into the 'gas chambers' and then removed. And since we know that the Zyklon-B pesticide would have taken hours to finish releasing it's cyanide load, we would then have had a situation where anyone in the entire area would have been vulnerable to gassing.

Looks like he answered your question spot on. There was no "leftover Zyklon-B" as he says there were no gassings.
Still no 'holocaust' related topics have been censored.
If you wish to continue then PM me. Clearly this issue is not a case of a 'holocaust' topic being censored.
Cheers, M1

[Hannover]

The desperate claims of 'censorship' usually come from those that have been demolished in debate at this forum. Andrew Mathis is a perfect example.
If those types had been 'censored' their arguments would not be here for everyone to read, yet anyone can read their arguments at this forum.

Here are examples, Mathis's failures first:

'holocaust' denial article by Andrew Mathis debunked here

Prof. Mc Nally dissects HHP's Andrew Mathis' bogus article

Holo. Hist. Proj.'s Andrew Mathis on Zyklon scent removal

Green, Mathis refuted / cyanide: lice, humans, & more

Believer org. spokesman, Andrew Mathis, demolished in debate

Holo. Hist. Proj.'s Andrew Mathis attempts damage control

Email from Andrew Mathis (The Holocaust History Project)

Andy Mathis / 'holocaust Hist. Project' Treblinka section

See Sergey Romanov, implode here:

Human soap & Human skin lampshades debunked

An example of Sergey Romanov's scholarship

Sergey Romanov - problems with Filip Mueller and Rudolf Vrba

for Roberto Muehlenkamp, aka 'Cortavagatas' see:

R.Muehlenkamp: 'gas chambers' were hosed down, so no cyanide

Those Prussian Blues Just Won't Wash

Roberto Muehlenkamp: no fuel required for Auschwitz ovens

Roberto Muehlenkamp shredded on 'gassings' & cyanide

Roberto Muehlenkamp debunked on 3.5kg of coke cremations

Cremation patent & 3.5 kg of coke per corpse debunked

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The Internet is demolishing the false narrative promoted by arrogant Jewish supremacists. From the slaughter of the Palestinians to the lies of Auschwitz the world is recognizing the dangers of Jewish supremacism.
The tide is turning.

[Werd]

The desperate claims of 'censorship' usually come from those that have been demolished in debate at this forum. Andrew Mathis is a perfect example.

Another example would be how this topic disappeared after I I annihilated Berker's responses loaded with dodges and strawmen. Thank you webarchive cache.

[Moderator]

Incorrect, Werd. That topic is covered elsewhere at this forum. Use our search function for Berg Leuchter and see the current 86 results or search cyanide explosion and see the current 43 results.
Whether you 'annihilated' anyone there is beside the point and in checking the discussion I would say that perhaps you are overstating your position. It looks like you did some dodging and strawmaning yourself. Perhaps it's in your best interests to leave a sleeping dog alone, Google's webcache can cut both ways. Nonetheless, that topic is and was not censored, period.
Thanks, M1

[Werd]

Nonetheless, that topic is and was not censored, period.

I might belive that if it weren't for the fact that another topic from 2007 also disappeared.
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4676
It was called NON-explosive Range of Cyanide Gas Concentrations.

Somebody was clearly combing the codoh archives to get rid of any evidence that would show up Faurisson and Leuchter. Shameful. Bet you didn't think I had that one saved in my own personal library, did ya?

[Moderator]

Werd,
Your point has no merit. Deleting one or two of Berg's obsessive, repetitive, name calling threads is warranted because, well, they are obsessive, repetitive, & name calling, often to an extreme. The subject cyanide explosion has obviously been covered at this forum, what about 86 & 43 results is difficult to understand? And we're certainly not going to discuss it in this thread.
Also, there's plenty of posts here where Berg rants about Leuchter & Faurisson, nobody is protecting them, you're simply ignoring those posts.

See one excellent example here of a thread started by Berg: The SANITY Test! where there's discussion on your non-explosive cyanide assertion AND Faurisson & Leuchter. This thread goes on for 13 pages consisting of 182 posts!

I do not care what you saved, it's certainly no secret or a big deal that participants save posts. In your case it has only revealed the very elements about yourself that you allege of someone else.

Anyway, if you don't accept my response then too bad, that's on you, not me.
I can only suggest that you commiserate with Berg. We're done with this.

Once again, no topic has been censored.
M1

[Werd]

no topic has been censored.

Are you accusing me of lying when I say that codoh deleted a 2007 topic called NON-explosive Range of Cyanide Gas Concentrations? Or what about the 2014 one called A Response to the Leuchter and Berg "debate"? Am I lying when I say that one was deleted?

[Hektor]

Deleting insulting or threatening posts are not censorship, if the subject has been discussed elsewhere. I think we debate non-explosive HCN concentrations elsewhere several times.

[Moderator]

Werd:
Let's just say you are obviously not aware of the massive coverage given to that topic. I repeat:

Werd,
Your point has no merit. Deleting one or two of Berg's obsessive, repetitive, name calling threads is warranted because, well, they are obsessive, repetitive, & name calling, often to an extreme. The subject cyanide explosion has obviously been covered at this forum, what about 86 & 43 results is difficult to understand? And we're certainly not going to discuss it in this thread.
Also, there's plenty of posts here where Berg rants about Leuchter & Faurisson, nobody is protecting them, you're simply ignoring those posts.

See one excellent example here of a thread started by Berg: The SANITY Test! where there's discussion on your non-explosive cyanide assertion AND Faurisson & Leuchter. This thread goes on for 13 pages consisting of 182 posts!

I do not care what you saved, it's certainly no secret or a big deal that participants save posts. In your case it has only revealed the very elements about yourself that you allege of someone else.

Anyway, if you don't accept my response then too bad, that's on you, not me.
I can only suggest that you commiserate with Berg. We're done with this.

Once again, no topic has been censored.
M1

[Moderator]

bump
M1

[Moderator]

Heat check.
M1

[Callahan]

Only sharing this here because after posting it then having it removed, then reaching out to the Moderator and explaining that this is not "just another 9/11 theory" and still receiving no justification or response whatever, I am bothered that this is being flippantly dismissed. 9/11 is very relevant to Revisionism and the Holocaust, and an evidence-based look at this event is even moreso. Nick Kollerstrom, in his work on Revisionism, also discusses 9/11. In any case, I see no reasonable justification as to why my post was censored.

And of course, those who are entirely unaware of additional parallels between the Holocaust and 9/11 may wish to review the work of Christopher Bollyn, beginning with the following presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuOsiMVlMBw

Callahan

[Off topic text with various 9/11 arguments removed as we generally do not discuss it. I did leave Callahan's opening comments above & YouTube link - M1]

[Moderator]

Callahan, from our guidelines which you agreed to:

On topic posts only. The topic of the Forum is the subject generally referred to as 'The Holocaust'. Debating it's credibility, or lack of, is the reason that The CODOH Revisionist Forum exists. Associated subjects are bound to come up, be sure there is a tie-in, show the tie-in. Each topic represents a separate point, a post to a topic must be pertinent to that point.

There are "parallels" between the "holocaust" narrative and many other lies which have been foisted upon the public, no doubt about it. Such activities generally do involve similar repressive activities and blatant misinformation techniques. That does not mean we will discuss them.
Imagine what this forum would look like if we did. The fact of the matter is that we are part of CODOH, Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.

Yes, I received your PM yesterday and was planing to respond. I do have other matters to take care of in my life.

Regards, M1

[JLAD Prove Me Wrong]

Moderator, I made a post asking if people who claim that reality isn't real (simulation argument) would be arrested in countries where denying the Holocaust is criminal. Why was that deleted?