Herve Ryssen quoting Y. Ganon's "Mengle Stole my Kidney" as a factual event; noting that NS is the equivalent of Judaism

[Damian77]

I purchased Herve Ryssen's book titled "The Jewish Mafia," which was published around 2008. It is a good read, however after seeing Ryssen promote many 'alt-right' Jewish figures -- the Jihad watch kind -- and then taking Ganon's words as fact, which is incredibly odd, because even as a layman who was still questioning revisionist theories, Ganon's story sounded so ridiculous that I would have thought Ryssen would debunk this sensationalized story, but he didn't. Why?

[hermod]

Would you please provide us with information and references about this case in order to clarify it?

(It's Mengele, not Mengle.)

[Hektor]

"Mengele stole my kidney"?

Presuming it is about the vilified Dr. Josef Mengele. What does he mean that this Dr. 'stole his kidney'? I presume he means to say that it was removed during an operation. Is there any evidence for this?

Now please don't give me that: "If Mengele didn't steal it, where did it go?" kind of fallacy.

[Damian77]

Would you please provide us with information and references about this case in order to clarify it?

(It's Mengele, not Mengle.)

The Jewish Mafia published by Omnia Veritas pp. 295-296.

[Hektor]

Would you please provide us with information and references about this case in order to clarify it?

(It's Mengele, not Mengle.)

The Jewish Mafia published by Omnia Veritas pp. 295-296.

From the product page:

Jews, through the media, are invariably presented as the victims of history. The idea of the Jew always persecuted for no reason is as old as Judaism itself. Thus, it is almost axiomatic to consider that Jews are incapable of evil. Therefore, a Jew who was both a gangster and a murderer may seem a priori surprising.

Joseph Roth, a famous Austrian Jewish writer of the interwar period wrote, for example, about the delinquency of Eastern Jews: "There is hardly a single robber. And no murderer or robber who murders." But the reality is nevertheless quite different when one becomes a little more informed.

The celebrated writer Elie Wiesel, a "survivor of the death camps," had the opportunity to do some research on the gangsters who spread terror in American cities. This he wrote in his memoirs: "I am preparing an investigation of the American underworld, the Mafia, and most particularly the Murder Incorporated hit men. Rummaging through the archives of various newspapers and municipal libraries, I have discovered with astonishment Jewish names. That's right, in the 1920s and 1930s, Jewish professional killers offered their services to that criminal society. They agreed to murder men and women who had done nothing to them and whom they did not even know. It is said that some of them boasted of being a practicing Jew, wore the kippah during their "work" and scrupulously respected the Sabbath rest."

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-je ... 1143245514

It's amusing to see how people get upset when you talk about the problem of Jewish criminality. As if they are the only ethnic group in the world where there are no criminals at all. Meanwhile they literally exist in any ethnic group to various degrees and also in some ethnic groups more than in other. There is also 'change over time' with this. So you can bet that there will be a "Jewish Mafia" as well. Question is how pervasive it is. The charges against the Jews were less connected to common law crimes like murder, theft etc. but in a grey area of quasi-legal business practices. There used to be quite some literature on this and there were also Jews that lamented this, since this was a problem for their relations with non-Jews who would suspect them of bad practices as well.

The comical treatment of 'bad Jews' in public debates has some typical features as well. First of all people get nervous, when you ask them whether a specific criminal is Jewish or not. When you point this out they tend to point out something like 'not all Jews are criminals'... Really? Why do you think this has to be mentioned explicitly? If I said the criminal was French, you probably wouldn't have bothered.

The issue with the Jews was actually that it appeared as if they were 'covering for each other' in business, in court, in publishing, theatre, etc. 'organizing and networking' that is. And it was ethnocentric regardless who observing the Jews involved actually were. As long as this is a side issue, people don't really bother about it. They only bother when a Jew has done them wrong individually. But when they start dominating whole sectors of society that way, it becomes another matter... That was happening prior to 1933 in Germany and that is why the NSDAP did actually address it. And well, this is also why various other groups DID NOT address it, since they were afraid to get on the invisible list of Antisemites maintained by the Jews.

Another thing is of course that police and courts know how to deal with criminals from their own ethnic background, their judgment in those cases is easier and also more appropriate. It's more difficult in cases were police and courts have to deal with criminals from another ethnicity. They don't figure out so easy what they are doing, they find it more difficult to communicate with witnesses. They may be seen as outsider snooping around in community affairs, etc. So criminals from ethnic minorities that are collectivistic, will find it easier to operate in large host populations with significantly different cultures. All this is of course ignored nowadays, just as the pre-history of National Socialism and WW2 is ignored. "New prejudices" have been induced into people and they don't even realize this. In fact those thinking they have no prejudices against Jews or other ethnicities are exactly those that do. And well, probably extremely bad prejudices by that.

[Butterfangers]

I purchased Herve Ryssen's book titled "The Jewish Mafia," which was published around 2008. It is a good read, however after seeing Ryssen promote many 'alt-right' Jewish figures -- the Jihad watch kind -- and then taking Ganon's words as fact, which is incredibly odd, because even as a layman who was still questioning revisionist theories, Ganon's story sounded so ridiculous that I would have thought Ryssen would debunk this sensationalized story, but he didn't. Why?

Could you do us a favor and post either a photo or a verbatim excerpt of the relevant and surrounding text of the book/statement you're referencing? There is not much to discuss if we don't know exactly what you're talking about.