Claude Lanzmann Accused of Sexual Assault

[Lothario]

Dutch journalist Joyce Roodnat has accused Claude Lanzmann, maker of the movie "Shoah", of sexual assaulting her. As I can only find sources in Dutch (http://media.tpo.nl/2017/10/19/nrc-columniste-beschuldigt-franse-holocaust-documentairemaker-aanranding-metoo/), I've translated the relevant part.

I was 29 and got to interview Claude Lanzmann in Paris for NRC. (...) The interview was at his home, he answered all questions extensively. While he was speaking about Auschwitz and the way he approached the camp executioners with hidden camera, he groped me. Fending hem off politely, I let him do it. I knew my place. He was the big film-maker, I was nobody. Besides, I needed the interview, leaving without was no option. The interesting thing was that neither he nor me said something about his behaviour.

When he behaved too scary, I stood up and said I had to go. He insisted on giving me a ride and I even got in his car. Why? I can't tell. Eventually I regained clear thinking. At a traffic light I got out. I wrote the article (http://www.delpher.nl/nl/kranten/view?coll=ddd&query=type%3D%22artikel%22+AND+%28%22Shoah%22%29+AND+%28%28%22Lanzmann%22%29+AND+%28%22Claude%22%29%29&facets%5Bpapertitle%5D%5B%5D=NRC+Handelsblad&facets%5Bperiode%5D%5B%5D=1%7C20e_eeuw%7C1980-1989%7C&page=1&identifier=KBNRC01%3A000028775%3Ampeg21%3Aa0125&resultsidentifier=KBNRC01%3A000028775%3Ampeg21%3Aa0125) and told no one. I kept silence out of respect for the art. Later I heard I wasn't the only one. That helped.

On television last night, she insisted on what a great movie 'Shoah' still is, like she was apologizing for outing him. That's telling. It's like he shares in the sacrosanctity of the 'holocaust'.

[Mortimer]

The documentary Shoah which Lanzmann directed has as its star witness Franz Suchomel a former SS officer who it is claimed witnessed mass gassings. But like all the other alleged German witnesses in this film he was paid a fee of 3000 DM and had to keep quiet about it for 30 years -
https://codoh.com/library/document/1449/

[Hannover]

The journalist, Joyce Roodnat, in this thread is in fact highlighting the use and reason for creation of the 'holocau$t' Big Lie in the first place.

To allow fiscal robbery, to allow the seizure - creation of their apartheid Jews Only state, to allow Jews & Zionism to avoid accountability that Jews demand of others.

Look at how long Harvey Weinstein got away with his perverted brutality, and now shyster Lanzmann gets some payback.
Search Lanzmann at this forum.

Is there no end?
Nationally known Jewish children's singer, songwriter arrested by FBI for child pornography
http://us.blastingnews.com/news/2017/09 ... 24197.html

Eric Komar

Many more examples here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11437

- Hannover

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”.
- Arthur Schopenhauer

[Vogels]

I translated her talking on television:

[Hektor]

I translated her talking on television:

I'm surprised something that blatant would be aired on Dutch TV. The Netherlands probably being the most Pro-Jewish, Pro-Zionist and to some extend also fanatically pro-Holocaust country in Europe. The later being linked to the Anne-Frank-Cult. Although the usually agreed upon facts of her life do actually favor the Revisionist view and not the Exterminationist one:

Anne Frank's fate is not unlike that of many other lesser-known victims of the wartime anti-Jewish policies imposed in Axis-ruled Europe. On August 4, 1944, police raided the "annex" in Amsterdam, Netherlands, where the Frank family had been living for two years. They were taken to the Dutch transfer camp of Westerbork.

As part of the German program to evacuate Jews from western Europe, the 15-year-old girl and other members of her family were deported by train from the Netherlands to the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp in what is now southern Poland.

Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne -- along with thousands of other Jewish prisoners -- was evacuated by rail from Auschwitz more than four hundred miles westward to the Bergen-Belsen camp in northwestern Germany.

Along with many other Belsen camp inmates, Anne came down with typhus, from which she died in mid-March 1945. She was not killed or murdered. Anne Frank perished -- like millions of others, both Jewish and non-Jewish, in Europe during that terrible time -- an indirect victim of history's most devastating war.

Few people realize that Anne, along with father and sister, and thousands of other Jews, "survived" Auschwitz-Birkenau. Her father, Otto Frank, came down with typhus and was transferred to the camp infirmary there to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January 1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in Switzerland in August 1980.

If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they would not have survived Auschwitz-Birkenau. Their fate, as tragic as it was, cannot be reconciled with the Holocaust extermination story.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n3p31_weber.html

Claude Lanzmann's movie Shoah may convince the gullible in their confirmation bias. However a lot of what he actually got filmed and aired is rather embarrassing to the Holocaust Industry once it is critically examined.

[Hannover]

More on shyster Lanzmann here:

P. Winter Debunks Suchomel's Fake "Confession" & C. Lanzmann
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9072

Holocaust Movie Shoah Exposed as Propaganda
http://www.vho.org/tr/2003/2/Beaulieu166-168.html

Shoah film 'witnesses' were paid says director Lanzmann
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1393

- Hannover

This is too easy.

[Dresden]

Serge Thion said of Claude Lansman in 1997:

https://codoh.com/library/document/2716/?lang=en

The Dictatorship of Imbecility

Claude Lanzmann and ‘Shoah’

By Serge Thion

"Unfortunately Claude Lanzmann has only a limited command of language. His most convincing arguments have always been, in his view, his fists and his genitals, the size of which he is prone to allude to – even suggesting to skeptical ladies that they check for themselves"

[Hektor]

....
"Unfortunately Claude Lanzmann has only a limited command of language. His most convincing arguments have always been, in his view, his fists and his genitals, the size of which he is prone to allude to – even suggesting to skeptical ladies that they check for themselves"

That might be some kind of chutzpah, he's displaying there. His character is the one thing and one may ask how representative it is for industry proponents. The apostles of the Holocaust seem to believe that their mission is something very special. Hence pleading for special rights could be really some big temptation for them.

More from the link above:

In the recent Le Monde interview (June 12, 1997), he was asked about his film’s “form”: “Of course, it is essential. ‘Shoah’ is a very complex narrative construction, built on circles and recurrence, sometimes four hours into the story ...” If the film honestly presented the interviews one after the other, complete and uncut, the entire pyramid would crumble into absurdity. “Shoah” is also stultifying because few of its viewers understand Polish (badly translated, specialists say), and because viewers cannot compare what was said two hours earlier with what was said five hours earlier.[6] But for the revisionist who knows the basic material, “Shoah” is particularly unimpressive because of the way it makes use of blatantly false testimonies. This has already been amply demonstrated

I may add that he's going through a lot of irrelevant, circumstantial detail. Now that's sometimes interesting for us, but if you'd like to make a point of proving final solution by homicidal gassings one would expect it to be condensed on that. Even the released cut isn't convincing at all, unless you are already seriously invested in the story. It works of course on the gullible. They won't critically assess what they're taking in there and simply be shocked by all this "banality of evil".

[Lothario]

Last night this journalist, Joyce Roodnat, was once again on television (same show) to talk about sexual harassment in general. She said she got a lot of responses from women who experienced the same with Lanzmann.

It might not be a surprise that she wasn't the only one, it's now confirmed.

[Hektor]

The documentary Shoah which Lanzmann directed has as its star witness Franz Suchomel a former SS officer who it is claimed witnessed mass gassings. But like all the other alleged German witnesses in this film he was paid a fee of 3000 DM and had to keep quiet about it for 30 years -
https://codoh.com/library/document/1449/

If it is a documentary, what did he actually document there?

If that was really their 'best shot' one needs to ask, what evidence they actually did secure. If you listen carefully many of the contemporary witnesses in positions 'where they should have known' did not know anything at the time.
Also not everything entered the directors cut of "Shoah"... There is far more footage they produced that indeed is far more revealing on a number of issues. It does so in a rather comical way, though. It's circumstantial and implicit... It's not 'blanket denial', but lots of the stuff simply doesn't fit the narrative.

While I'm not agreeing with the ostensible message of the movie, I welcome the footage as being useful for Revisionism.