Refuting the truthers 3 ways, each decisive.

[flimflam]

Short form:

It’s easy to see that the truthers’ claim that the buildings were wired with explosives is absurd, for several reasons –

#1 – The whole premise of the truthers is that the feds wired the buildings with explosives, and then used drones or Arab stooges to mask their activities by flying planes into the buildings. But, that premise is absurd because they couldn’t and didn’t fly a plane into WTC 7.

#2 – See how a building is prepared for demolition – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg, it’s an extensive involved process that takes place throughout the entire building. It can’t be done when a building is occupied, much less done unobserved.

#3 – WTC 7 and the south tower collapsed in completely different ways, which would not have happened had they been wired. WTC 7 collapsed from below, with all floors of WTC 7 beginning to fall simultaneously when the collapse starts. The south tower collapsed from above, with each floor not beginning to fall until the collapsing top floor reaches it. The difference is dramatic and easily observable:
South tower at 0:20
WTC 7 at 0:28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W00HXsep_c

Let's be done with this idiocy.

And, there's more, but the above will do for now.

[atomMan]

The whole premise of the truthers is that the feds wired the buildings with explosives, and then used drones or Arab stooges to mask their activities by flying planes into the buildings.

that is not true - there are many scenarios that were/are currently being considered within the investigative communities

[demolition setup] can’t be done when a building is occupied, much less done unobserved.

you are thinking in traditional terms where there is no reason to conceal the work - it is indeed possible to set demolition charges without being noticed (ask the Navy) and though i don't know if this has ever been done with a high-rise, i think it is quite presumptuous to conclude that it cannot be done

WTC 7 and the south tower collapsed in completely different ways, which would not have happened had they been wired. WTC 7 collapsed from below, with all floors of WTC 7 beginning to fall simultaneously when the collapse starts.

why not? there are a multitude of considerations when demolishing a structure that play into how the charges are set and timed - different scenarios require different methods - if you are thinking 7 was unusual because it collapsed from the bottom up, it wasn't...

https://invidio.us/watch?v=xYjF9WPyZfg

or vise-versa...

https://invidio.us/watch?v=5CsSXPCGjww

[Pia Kahn]

Short form:

....#2 – See how a building is prepared for demolition – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg, it’s an extensive involved process that takes place throughout the entire building. It can’t be done when a building is occupied, much less done unobserved.

Let's be done with this idiocy.

And, there's more, but the above will do for now.

Why can it not be done "unobserved"? Whenever parts of the building are repaired by construction workers, they can rig the building with explosives and none of the people working within the buildings will suspect anything. This is how it can be done easily.

Why don't we just look at the physical evidence? That's not idiocy, that's science.

The physical evidence clearly points to a controlled demolition. There is no other reasonable explanation for the observed facts.