The ‘‘Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023’’

[fireofice]

There is apparently a push by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee to gut free speech protections for talking about white replacement or anything considered to be "white supremacy" in the US.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2 ... t-of-2023/

If something like this passes and gets held up, that will be it for free speech in America. Once the 1st amendment in America gets destroyed, it won't be long before other forms of speech get criminalized, like holocaust denial. In fact, holocaust denial itself may be applied under this, as it could also be interpreted as "white supremacy" if they so wish.

[Hektor]

There is apparently a push by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee to gut free speech protections for talking about white replacement or anything considered to be "white supremacy" in the US.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2 ... t-of-2023/

If something like this passes and gets held up, that will be it for free speech in America. Once the 1st amendment in America gets destroyed, it won't be long before other forms of speech get criminalized, like holocaust denial. In fact, holocaust denial itself may be applied under this, as it could also be interpreted as "white supremacy" if they so wish.

The act may not stipulate this. But if applied they will probably pull out, 'if you denied the Holocaust" at some time.
The German legislation also does not stipulate Holocaust in wording, but it's formulated in a way that it will cover such instances. Essentially you 'can't deny wrongdoing done *under NS-Germany*, while you can dispute it for any other government'. That's how paragraph 130:3 reads.
Bear in mind that 'the Holocaust' is instrumental to gas light Germans to abstain from German Nationalism. Any party with a pro-national platform will be nazified and that is powerful, because people were made to believe in the Holocaust. Virtually all arguments against German Nationalism revolve around this.

In the US they go for 'White Supremacy' for similar reasons. Anyone that opposes the social engineering taking place will be charged as "White Supremacist". Recent immigrants are predominantly non-White and it is pretty obvious that this is promoted on purpose. The "everyone can be an American"-idea was promoted by Jewish organizations at an early stage. E.g.: "The Myth that threatens America":
https://archive.org/details/TheMythThatThreatensAmerica


The fact that they try to suppress political opinions is also an opening to include Holocaust related opinions.

To prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime and to amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of hate crimes.

It is also blurring legal language even more. What exactly is a hate crime? Is this violence against a person or is it already enough to speak less then worshipful about a person or group?
Also note the term 'conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime' ... Conspiracy can be anything e.g. publishing of opinions that promote one group and disparage another.


I said this on several occasions in the past. But I predicted that 'multiculturalism' will ultimately lead to the repression of freedom of speech and freedom of association. Simply because a 'multicultural society' can't allow dissent around issues of ethnicity as that may lead to conflict inside that society. That dissent is nowadays called 'racism' a rather undescriptive term that can mean various things to various people. But it is loaded language, it has become so since the 1960s... Loaded terminology is like powerful cult language. It's designed to manipulate people into emotions and compliance. This in itself should make people already think, but it doesn't. The terms also describe thought-terminating cliches.

[fireofice]

More info on the threat to free speech:

How They Plan to Shut Us Up by Jared Taylor
https://www.amren.com/videos/2023/01/ho ... hut-us-up/

It's interesting here that they plan on outlawing free speech using the same method that was used to determine that the holocaust happened. If they determine you engaged in a "conspiracy" even if you don't know each other, you can be shut down. Sounds very similar to what Raul Hilberg proposed happened with the holocaust.

Is America a ‘Free Country?’ by Gregory Hood
https://www.amren.com/features/2023/01/ ... e-country/

It has also been shown that the government has been involved with shutting down speech on twitter. No doubt this involved other platforms as well and that "holocaust denial" was among those targeted.

[DissentingOpinions]

This proposed act doesn’t aim to criminalize free speech or WN activism, rather it targets groups of people who plan on committing hate crimes based on White Nationalist material - meaning 4-5 or more people would have to be discussing media material & planning to commit acts of violence, vandalism, or real world harassment based on what was discussed. I understand words can be misinterpreted, but it’s threads like this that set the bar for reading comprehension low.

[Lamprecht]

it targets groups of people who plan on committing hate crimes based on White Nationalist material - meaning 4-5 or more people would have to be discussing media material & planning to commit acts of violence, vandalism, or real world harassment

So all that even needs to happen is a federal agent enters the conversation and tries to encourage "terrorism" or "harassment" - yeah, as if that's unprecedented.
It's the sort of thing that one can easily see would be relentlessly abused.
Not to mention, these spying agencies would have an excuse for why they need to start spying on "White nationalists."

[Turpitz]

it targets groups of people who plan on committing hate crimes based on White Nationalist material

Sheila Jackson Lee is an A.I.P.A.C. whore; so no suprise that she is pushing ant-white laws as her handlers detest dumb-Goy. They introduce these very same types of laws in Palestine to help eradicate the indigenous population there. as well.

[Hektor]

This proposed act doesn’t aim to criminalize free speech or WN activism, rather it targets groups of people who plan on committing hate crimes based on White Nationalist material - meaning 4-5 or more people would have to be discussing media material & planning to commit acts of violence, vandalism, or real world harassment based on what was discussed. I understand words can be misinterpreted, but it’s threads like this that set the bar for reading comprehension low.

We get that it doesn't ban free speech outrightly.
It's however demonizing certain types of speech:

Mass shootings and other hate crimes motivated by white supremacy have been increasing in frequency and intensity. These heinous and virulent crimes are inspired by conspiracy theories, blatant bigotry, and mythical falsehoods such as “replacement theory”. All instances must be prevented and severe criminal penalties must be applied to their perpetrators

The planning and committing of violence against persons is already a crime. So why do you think they proposed this New legislation?

Aren't they suggesting that 'conspiracy theories', 'replacement theory' or any other dissent from their agenda is somehow conducive to committing 'violent crimes'?

If they'd clearly say 'we ban free speech' this would be rejected. But they skill can score points by associating ideas they don't like with violence.
It's all about 'offending'... And threshold for this can be lowered over time.

The German paragraph 130 did also develop that way. First it was 'inciting racial hatred' than it was 'denying, trivializing, condoning' what they belief about world war two. They of course know that they can't police everything, but they know they can intimidate people by associating certain ideas they don't like with violent crime. I think the intention is pretty obvious.

[hermod]

"White supremacist" is a deceptive codeword of the Globalist jargon for "anti-Globalist resistance." A statement doesn't need to be supremacist or even about anything White to be labelled as such. But the rulers of Western democracies can't concede too openly that they censor some things for political reasons ( such as the best interests of their dear (((backers))) ) without botching the illusion of freedom on which Western democracies base their legitimacy. So they necessarily need to feign other reasons when they increase censorship in their dominions.

Not "hate speech," academic teaching from Harvard Magazine

[borjastick]

Hermod your last image showing Noel Ignatiev is odd in that I have always been confused by this flip flopping of jews who one minute think they are all victims of the holocaust and were white Europeans at the time and then believe they are of middle eastern/holyland origin and thus not white.

As far as I know 90% odd of all jews on the planet are Ashkenazi jews who were eastern european descent not middle eastern israelite types. Furthermore about 100% of all holocaust 'victims' were Ashkenazi jews who I have always regarded as fake jews because they do not conform with their religion's view of what makes a jew a jew.

Then they all want the white race, from which they come, to be destroyed.