The Jewish Children that 'Survived'

[borjastick]

Surely the fact of so many children being kept in the camps and then those thousands born in the camps is all the proof one could need that the holocaust as claimed is pure nonsense? Survivors who were children at the time have given plenty of interviews, to the likes of the Spielberg film people, that they had a very good time in the camps with art and music and plays plus of course medical care etc.

[Lamprecht]

Large numbers of people can and have "disappeared" by relocation. For example, the Allied media propaganda sinisterly "explained" the disappearance of the entire population of St. Quentin (France) during WW1 through some gruesome mystery:


In reality, the Germans evacuated the whole population of St. Quentin to over 100 towns in northern France and Belgium because the city of St. Quentin was located in their main line of defense on the Western front, the Hindenburg line.

I agree there is no good proof they were murdered, but perhaps there is proof that they survived?

Humans cannot magically disappear; if the claim is "at this place, hundreds of thousands of people were gassed, burned and buried" there would be an enormous quantity of physical evidence in the form of huge mass graves. And that is indeed the claim for many so-called "extermination camps" but the physical evidence for such a claim cannot be shown to exist.

To demand a complete travel itinerary for every Jew during WWII is just unreasonable. To suggest we go about figuring the exact whereabouts of individuals 7 decades after the fact is laughably absurd.

If they were kept in the camps then that contradicts official narrative as well. Contacting the children or grandchildren of "survivors" might be a useful way of constructing a body of evidence that contradicts official narrative.

There is no reason to flip the hierarchy of evidence upside down. Party testimony is already the weakest form of evidence, when it is obtained many decades after the event (with financial incentives to lie and exaggerate) it becomes completely meaningless.

The official narrative is already dead. It maintains its credibility through mass ignorance and censorship. Most people in the West believe "The Holocaust happened" but likely could not even name five concentration camps from memory. That does not really matter to the exterminationists, so long as a person believes "The Nazis killed 5-6 million Jews" they are content.

Polish Jews who were children at this time seems like a useful avenue because if any of them are telling truth or let the truth slip out, perhaps in unpublished memoirs or the stories they told their children, this is going to blatantly contradict the official narrative.

All of the millions of "Holocaust survivors" blatantly contradict the official narrative, as they would not have survived if there was a "Holocaust" as alleged.

[Otium]

They couldn't say much because they were behind the Iron Curtain matey.

These children would be in their late 50s or early 60s when the iron curtain lifts. Clearly some people have reliable memories of where and how they lived when they were children. If you are Jewish I'm sure you'd get a lot of questions. Considering there are at least hundreds of thousands of them, is it really believable that all of them or 99.9% could fabricate what happened to them during 1941-1945 without being prodded, manipulated by some external power. This is very interesting to me.

You can say whatever you want, if you have no proof then what you say cannot be falsified and thus is only a matter of conjecture not historical fact.

These same kids grow up in environments bombarded with Holocaust stories and imagery, this forms from a young age a confirmation bias in their minds where they will relate real or imagined events from their past of which we cannot tell is or is not true. It might be interesting to you, but just because you think the numerical number of alleged stories from Jews whom grew into adults is true doesn't do a damn thing to prove any of it.

An analogy commonly used is that of the UFO or Bigfoot sighting, alien encounter, or some weird paranormal phenomenon. Many people have claimed to experience these things, yet such an abundance of such stories doesn't make them true.

But what of their children? Do 9 year olds, who would have been 6-8 during the most crucial period, have the capacity to lie so well and thoroughly
that not a single report of a Jewish child speaking "erroneously" about that Holocaust has surfaced?

Are you really that stupid? How can you possibly get testimony from a Jewish child, who in any case wouldn't be cognitively adept to interpret reality in the first place being so young, let alone absorb new information and think critically about it, but actually interview one of these children when the only chance you'd have to do so is after the war when they were already adults? Or perhaps the allies did interview masses of children in the years immediately after the war? If not then this proposition you've made is an utterly pointless mental exercise in stupidity.

I think this tips you off about the power of the elites who perpetuated this whole thing. The only explanation I can think of is that these kids were brainwashed, hypnotized, perhaps implanted with false memories. Do you guys have any other theories?

You're joking right? Did you really think your prior comment was so logically sound that it would justify a ridiculous self serving joke like this? And you think it's at the expense of revisionists? As if saying this kind of thing is a valid exaggeration stemming from things we revisionists actually believe and isn't a totally made up invention perpetrated by you. Either that, or you genuinely thought you'd blend into the revisionist crowd with such preposterous "theories". I don't know what's worse; however I do know that it certainly doesn't reflect well on your ability to argue or even think. You look like an incompetent buffoon.

But let me ask you this. If all Jews act the way you do, why on earth should we trust a damn thing they say? Or have ever said? You obviously think we should, yet your example has been one of mockery and intellectual dishonesty from the very beginning. If you want to argue the Holocaust, it'd be best not to expose yourself as totally untrustworthy. Although I think that goes for all aspects of life, a concept Jews clearly know little to nothing about.