Hektor wrote:.
Holocaustian seem to have neither. They can't justify their believe in the Holocaust with facts and rational argumentation always playing on innuendo and emotion.
Holocaust Summary
Moderator: Moderator
Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Re: An Overview
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed. "
Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed. "
Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925
Re: An Overview
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith
-
- Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:12 am
Re: An Overview
This hasn't become a sticky yet.
Re: An Overview
This hasn't become a sticky yet.
Nor will it be.
It sounds good at first, but any 'overview' would include far too may topics to be coherent in a single thread.
That is why we, a 'holocaust' forum, have threads to begin with.
Trying to debate all the facets of the narrative in a single thread would result in a chaotic, jumbled, difficult to follow (especially for the new readers), mess.
Besides, I dare say that most people viewing this forum know the generally marketed story, the overview.
BTW: There are already over 9500 threads / topics currently at this forum, granted, some are a bit redundant.
This thread can go awhile, a sticky not, but I guarantee that it will eventually become the very problem so mentioned.
Look at the original post in this thread and then imagine the various discussions that could occur on any of the numerous listed topics within the 'overview'.
Yep, chaos.
Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.
-
- Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:12 am
Re: An Overview
How about Hegwood's original post being a 'locked sticky' with instructions for newcomers to maybe take questions from it, then they could be guided to appropiate threads?
Re: An Overview
XZW wrote:
xzw,
You do not have to worry about buying me a ticket to Yad Vashem, I will never set foot on what should be Palestinian soil. Despite being forced to support Israel by paying taxes, I will not do so voluntarily. I will not even knowingly buy a product "made in Israel" and am reluctant to return to a store that sells me such a product.
You find my overview "disappointing", not inaccurate, just disappointing. I did my best to just simply relate the story in brief without injecting my opinion. If you feel some part of wording misrepresents the story please explain.
That it sounds like I am "highly skeptical of the Holocoust, maybe even denial it" is understandable because it is true. That however wasn't something I intended or added. In fact it is something I tried to avoid doing. Any "skepticism even denial" results from the story itself. It comes from your own inability to believe.
Again, this "skeptical/denial tone", as you call it, is inherent in the impossibility of the story. In other words just relating the Holocaust story is Holocaust denial and should be punishable under the Holocaust Denial Laws where they exist.
Your post should have done more to convince the operators of this site of the importance of a posting a short description of the Holocaust story under discussion than anything I've done. When you, apparently a true believer, sees the actual story set before you, you find it "dissapointing". Because I present to you what you supposedly already believe you call me a holocaust denier.
Hegwood
Ive got to say that your overview is really dissapointing me. The tone of your writing tells me your highly skeptical of the Holocoust, maybe even denial it. But Ill guarantee you this. If you come for a visit to Israel, Im buiyng you a ticket to Yad Vashem Museum, for you to see the facts IN your eyes and not only in some kind of material.
xzw,
You do not have to worry about buying me a ticket to Yad Vashem, I will never set foot on what should be Palestinian soil. Despite being forced to support Israel by paying taxes, I will not do so voluntarily. I will not even knowingly buy a product "made in Israel" and am reluctant to return to a store that sells me such a product.
You find my overview "disappointing", not inaccurate, just disappointing. I did my best to just simply relate the story in brief without injecting my opinion. If you feel some part of wording misrepresents the story please explain.
That it sounds like I am "highly skeptical of the Holocoust, maybe even denial it" is understandable because it is true. That however wasn't something I intended or added. In fact it is something I tried to avoid doing. Any "skepticism even denial" results from the story itself. It comes from your own inability to believe.
Again, this "skeptical/denial tone", as you call it, is inherent in the impossibility of the story. In other words just relating the Holocaust story is Holocaust denial and should be punishable under the Holocaust Denial Laws where they exist.
Your post should have done more to convince the operators of this site of the importance of a posting a short description of the Holocaust story under discussion than anything I've done. When you, apparently a true believer, sees the actual story set before you, you find it "dissapointing". Because I present to you what you supposedly already believe you call me a holocaust denier.
Hegwood
Re: Holocaust Summary
Hegwood wrote:I believe that preservation of the lie is accomplished by presenting it as a mish-mash of place names and horror stories without ever connecting them.
Excellent point worth quoting and remembering.
[threads 'An Overview' & 'Holocaust Summary' merged, 5/7/17, M1]
Re: Holocaust Summary
Hegwood said:
"Again, this "skeptical/denial tone", as you call it, is inherent in the impossibility of the story. In other words just relating the Holocaust story is Holocaust denial and should be punishable under the Holocaust Denial Laws where they exist"
That's another quotable quote.
"Again, this "skeptical/denial tone", as you call it, is inherent in the impossibility of the story. In other words just relating the Holocaust story is Holocaust denial and should be punishable under the Holocaust Denial Laws where they exist"
That's another quotable quote.
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith
Re: Holocaust Summary
M1,
The following statement appears in Sannhet's preceding post.
However the "An Overview" post was not included in the merged thread. If you are going to merge the threads shouldn't it at least include both original posts.
Hegwood
The following statement appears in Sannhet's preceding post.
[threads 'An Overview' & 'Holocaust Summary' merged, 5/7/17, M1]
However the "An Overview" post was not included in the merged thread. If you are going to merge the threads shouldn't it at least include both original posts.
Hegwood
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:30 pm
Re: Holocaust Summary
As far as I can tell, reading through Wikipedia, etc. is the Holocaust started with the shooting of "innocent" Jewish men and boys by the Einsatzgruppen, followed by the inclusion of women and children. The first "death camp" was at Chelmno, followed by the Reinhard Camps and capped off with Auschwitz.
Any thinking person can see the fallacy of all that, why waste bullets if you are going to wind up gassing them? Why waste time screwing around with "gas vans" and makeshift gas chambers in the middle of nowhere?
Any thinking person can see the fallacy of all that, why waste bullets if you are going to wind up gassing them? Why waste time screwing around with "gas vans" and makeshift gas chambers in the middle of nowhere?
Re: Holocaust Summary
Metal Murphy wrote:As far as I can tell, reading through Wikipedia, etc. is the Holocaust started with the shooting of "innocent" Jewish men and boys by the Einsatzgruppen, followed by the inclusion of women and children. The first "death camp" was at Chelmno, followed by the Reinhard Camps and capped off with Auschwitz.
Any thinking person can see the fallacy of all that, why waste bullets if you are going to wind up gassing them? Why waste time screwing around with "gas vans" and makeshift gas chambers in the middle of nowhere?
We believe this has been posted here before, but "Wikipedia"? It is the playground of Zionists, Marxists, and all things pro Jew.
Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189
B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:30 pm
Re: Holocaust Summary
Breker wrote:Metal Murphy wrote:As far as I can tell, reading through Wikipedia, etc. is the Holocaust started with the shooting of "innocent" Jewish men and boys by the Einsatzgruppen, followed by the inclusion of women and children. The first "death camp" was at Chelmno, followed by the Reinhard Camps and capped off with Auschwitz.
Any thinking person can see the fallacy of all that, why waste bullets if you are going to wind up gassing them? Why waste time screwing around with "gas vans" and makeshift gas chambers in the middle of nowhere?
We believe this has been posted here before, but "Wikipedia"? It is the playground of Zionists, Marxists, and all things pro Jew.
Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189
B.
Eh, I'm not spending any money on so-called Holocaust books. I gleaned a lot of that from other places besides Wikipedia.
Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Eduardo and 14 guests