Huge surge in CODOH Forum interest, numbers say it all

[Hannover]

I been noticing big numbers of those online at this forum at any given time. I'm seeing triple digit numbers with regularity.

Multiply that by the minutes, hours in a day and it makes for huge numbers of viewers per day.

Not bad for a crew with next to no funding, not bad for thoughts that are illegal, banned, censored by the usual enemies of free speech.

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

Best, Hannover

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”.
- Arthur Schopenhauer

[Metal Murphy]

It brought me here. I've thought there was something wrong with the whole narrative this entire time.

[Sannhet]

I suspect that a large majority of online users are arriving via Google searches at old threads from the CODOH Archive. By way of a more concrete statistic to guess at readership of new/active threads, I note that, as of this writing, this very thread has 67 views (19 hours after posting), or 3 to 4 views per hour.

In which countries is CODOH-Forum banned? I presume is it banned in all the countries which ban Holocaust Skepticism (ten countries?), so readership there will necessarily be much lower if Google blocks CODOH in those countries.

[Hannover]

I suspect that a large majority of online users are arriving via Google searches at old threads from the CODOH Archive.

Why do you say that?

At this very moment we see:

In total there are 90 users online :: 6 registered, 1 hidden and 83 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 763 on Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:22 am

said:

By way of a more concrete statistic to guess at readership of new/active threads, I note that, as of this writing, this very thread has 67 views (19 hours after posting), or 3 to 4 views per hour.

Why do you say that?
Not all threads necessarily receive the same no. of views, obviously

- Hannover

[Sannhet]

I suspect that a large majority of online users are arriving via Google searches at old threads from the CODOH Archive.

Why do you say that?

I say this because threads originally posted a year ago generally have many times more views than threads posted a month ago.

Going randomly to viewforum.php?f=2&start=500, I find, e.g.:

Interview with Efraim Zuroff - The last nazi hunter...
by borjastick » 1 year 1 week ago
0 Replies 857 Views

That is a lot of views compared to threads from last week (viewforum.php?f=2&start=25) with 0 replies, the view counts for which are all in the 100s. This suggests to me that the Efraim Zuroff thread got a steady stream of visitors via Google searches since its posting last summer by borjastick (this CODOH thread ranks sixth in a google search for the name).

The point is, CODOH-Forum material forms an archive of knowledge that persists long after specific posts/topics are forgotten by participants, and which need not be judged by what the immediate exposure is. There is much good material here and it will be found for years to come.

Long live CODOH Forum!

[borjastick]

The reason that thread got so many views is down to the quality of the thought behind it and the presentation skill of the author

Codoh Forum is growing for all sorts of reasons and will continue to do so all the time the israelis push ad nauseum their contrived political nonsense supported and always verbalised about the holocaust. They have no off button, they can never understand that people are tired of this old story, it doesn't resonate with many people, it is as see through as a whore's nightie and without much searching here or elsewhere on the web people can see the truth about their claims.

Long live truth, decency, honest investigation and an inquiring public mind.

[Hektor]

I suspect that a large majority of online users are arriving via Google searches at old threads from the CODOH Archive. By way of a more concrete statistic to guess at readership of new/active threads, I note that, as of this writing, this very thread has 67 views (19 hours after posting), or 3 to 4 views per hour.

Old pages / threads can indeed become very valuable, especially when they're linked to from other sites. People will find them in searches. I just hope it's not just bots that visit, but natural persons. I wonder what the ratio is?

In which countries is CODOH-Forum banned? I presume is it banned in all the countries which ban Holocaust Skepticism (ten countries?), so readership there will necessarily be much lower if Google blocks CODOH in those countries.

It isn't really banned, but blocked on certain national google search engines. E.G. try finding it via google.de, google.ca, google.at, google.pl etc. and compare results for the same search terms.

[CognitiveDestruction]

The sad thing is that the forum's traffic is about to drop by a tenfold, now that net neutrality is about to die. I'm seriously concerned for every politically incorrect website out there, because this could be the end of free speech on the internet as we know it.

[Rmbrmb21]

The numbers would skyrocket even further if this site was publicized more. Sure, you'd get 50% ardent believers come to insult and not actually learn or debate, 25% believers open to the idea there is something fishy about it all, and another 25% skeptics or deniers/revisionists. I mean, with Hitler's name being strewn about alongside 'Nazi' used as a derogatory word, you're bound to have people google some stuff.

On top of that, I honestly believe that Hitler and Nazism, or something akin to it, are encroaching on being as popular as they were in the 1930s. The Alt-Right, which is apparently massive enough to shift an American election, is at its base made up of ethnic-nationalists and fascists that idolize Hitler and the Nazis. I admire Hitler and the Nazis even, but it's not something I plaster all over the internet, neither do I wear swastikas or Heil Hitler in public, but my contemporaries can't seem to do it enough. And no, I don't believe it's ironic humor somehow, it seems too genuine for that.

So, this is probably, maybe, I don't know, but it could be part of the reason there has been an influx in site activity. It's a good thing at any rate.

[Moderator]

Rmbrmb21:
We do advertise where possible, but censorship and attacks on freedom speech are choreographed by those those that profit, benefit from the narrative. Orwell was right.

We can all play a part by simply leaving the CODOH Forum url when posting anything, anywhere. Be relentless, the usual propagandists & enemies of free speech certainly are.

Thanks, M1
http://forum.codoh.com

[Depth Charge]

It's not hard to see that it's not just CODOH. They've lost control of YouTube, the likes bars and comments sections being good tap into the current nerve of the masses. Holocaust mockery and debunking videos are rife there, with jeering and laughing comments and glowing likes. Zio propaganda is conversely ruthlessly torn up. Once, on the internet at least, being a 'holocaust denier' was taboo and you'd be the odd one out to speak up in a thread and/or comments section.

Now, it's becoming more and more common knowledge, on bigger and bigger platforms.

The 'holocaust' subreddit, on the so-called 'frontpage of the internet', has been conquered by those exposing the lies. Whereas decrepit 1990's era sites like AxisHistory are ghostly backwaters, visited only by some people looking for uniform trivia or armored formation info... the regulars are deranged zealots who have been completely bypassed.

Unfortunately though, things are moving so fast that there's no way they can let it continue. The ad boycott on YouTube was an attempt to free it from the Alt-Right grip, that hasn't worked. So drastic things are going to happen, but we may have crossed a threshold where it only makes the uproar grow even stronger.

[Depth Charge]

I'd also like to make a suggestion of an additional subforum that exposes lies and propaganda beyond WW2. People who are sceptics of official dogma would be led here by keywords, then find the truth being exposed about the 'holocaust' on the same site. Exposing the lies about WMD, 9/11, Syria... these are like shooting fish in a barrel and more amenable for disillusioned 'casuals'. They can realise that the same plotholes found in 9/11 are found in WW2.

How about a current affairs subforum?

[Hektor]

I'd also like to make a suggestion of an additional subforum that exposes lies and propaganda beyond WW2. People who are sceptics of official dogma would be led here by keywords, then find the truth being exposed about the 'holocaust' on the same site. Exposing the lies about WMD, 9/11, Syria... these are like shooting fish in a barrel and more amenable for disillusioned 'casuals'. They can realise that the same plotholes found in 9/11 are found in WW2.

How about a current affairs subforum?

I'd second that. But one should start with a subforum "General Revisionism" and then see where the interest goes, before one creates other more specialized subforums.

[Moderator]

DC & Hector suggestions:

How about a current affairs subforum?

I'd second that. But one should start with a subforum "General Revisionism" and then see where the interest goes, before one creates other more specialized subforums.

Certainly, more than glad to set it up.

- Before starting give me specifics as to guidelines, generally the same us the others?
- 'Current Affairs' can be the general forum subject heading, but how do we sort out what will be a great variety of specific sub-subjects?
I do think it's better to have forums already set up for each, we can always expand accordingly.
- So, what sub-subjects?
- Moderators? Who?

Thoughts, please.
M1

[Depth Charge]

Let it ebb and flow, see how each section takes.