Jewess admits she was released from Majdanek

[Hannover]

Hohenems:

Since it was founded. The camp opened in October 1941, which is before any allegations of gassing happening pretty much anywhere. The first people kept there were Soviet POWs. Plus the camp was loaded with people when the Russians got there.

"Loaded with people" is best described as 'loaded with Jews'. So, why would this 'extermination camp' be loaded with Jews at the time of the arrival of the communist Soviets if a 'planned, industrialized methodical extermination of Jews' was what the Germans intended?
This dog don't hunt.

The tide is turning.

- Hannover

[Hohenems]

Interestingly, one of the first reports on Majdanek came in Time magazine. The standard Soviet claims are there, but notice it doesn't mention Jews. Grand total found there: 1,000:

Quote from: Time, Vl. 44, Issue 8, p38, Aug 21, 1944
Vernichtungslager

Last week the Russian press published the first eye-witness description of a Nazi extermination camp. Wrote Soviet War Correspondent Roman Karmen:

"In the course of all my travels into liberated territory I have never seen a more abominable sight than Maiden, near Lublin, Hitler's notorious Vernichtungslager [extermination camp] where more than half a million European men, women and children were massacred. . . . This was not a concentration camp; it was a gigantic murder plant.

"Save for 1,000 living corpses the Red Army found when it entered, no inmate escaped alive. Yet full trains daily brought thousands from all parts of Europe to be coldly, brutally massacred."

Biggest Crematorium. "In the center of the camp stands a huge stone building with a factory chimney—the world's biggest crematorium. The Germans attempted to burn it but most of it still stands—a grim monument to the Third Reich.

"Groups of 100 people would be brought here to be burned almost alive. They already had been stripped and then chlorinated in special gas chambers adjoining. The gas chambers contained some 250 persons at one time. They were closely packed ... so that after they suffocated they remained standing. . . . The human cargoes were dumped into a roaring furnace heated to 1,500° Centigrade. . . ."

Human Bone Meal. The victims' charred bones and ashes were moved into an adjoining department where an incredible process went on. These human bones were mechanically pulverized, placed inside large tin cans and shipped back to Germany for fertilizing the fields.

"It is difficult to believe it myself but my eyes cannot deceive me. I see the human bones, lime barrels, chlorine pipes and furnace machinery. I see the enormous dumps of shoes, sandals and slippers in men's, women's and children's sizes bearing the trademarks of a dozen European countries. . . .

"The cremation furnace was running day & night and its chimneys never ceased smoking. The capacity of its five compartments was 1,400 daily. . . . The Germans had begun to build an annex when the Red Army arrived.

"The Russian Army came in time to save the last set of victims earmarked for slaughter."

[Renewal]

I'm pointing out that Renewal's attack on the storyline is ineffective because it involves the wrong camp.

I must be getting old. Where's that storyline I have been attacking?

[Hannover]

Hohenems:

She claims that she was released because she could pass as Polish.

Yet she was supposedly brought there because she was a Jew and checked in as a Jew, but now claims " she could pass as Polish"? "Polish" meaning a non-Jew I assume. That makes no sense at all. Please, verbatim quote and citation for that.

Hohenems:

Interestingly, one of the first reports on Majdanek came in Time magazine. The standard Soviet claims are there, but notice it doesn't mention Jews. Grand total found there: 1,000:

The laughable false claims about Majdanek have never been consistent, which indicates the entire matter of 'extermination' of anyone to made of whole cloth. Curious that Time magazine would print communist Soviet propaganda in the first place. "Bone meal", right.

More on Majdanek taken from David Cole's: 46 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS REGARDING 'GAS CHAMBERS,
http://codoh.com/library/document/987

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AT THE MAJDANEK CONCENTRATION CAMP (POLAND)

27) Gas chamber 1 has two doors, both of which open INTO the gas chamber room. How can a homicidal gas chamber have two doors which open IN? Wouldn't the bodies be pressed up against the doors, as described numerous times by eyewitnesses?

28- The main door into the gas chamber 1 has no locks. It can be opened from either the inside or the outside. There are no holes or fittings where a lock might have been. What stopped the inmates from opening this door?

29) Gas chamber 1 has a plate glass window in it. There are no holes or fittings around the window where bars or any other kind of cover might once have been. Since the plaster around the window is covered with blue stains, we know that it is the plaster that existed during the time Zyklon B gas was used in this room. If there WERE bars or any other type of cover attached to this window, why are there no traces? What would have stopped the inmates from trying to climb out the window, or breaking the window and causing a gas leak?

30) There is a room INSIDE gas chamber 1. Why would there be a separate room INSIDE a gas chamber? Doesn't this room indicate that gas chamber 1 was used for something OTHER than killing people?

31) Gas chambers 2 and 3 are designed backwards. Chamber 2 has a Zyklon B induction hole in the ceiling, but no Zyklon B traces or blue stains. Chamber 3 has heavy, floor-to-ceiling Zyklon B traces and blue stains, but no Zyklon B induction hole. And, like the roof of Krema 2 at Auschwitz, the ceiling shows no sign of a hole having ever been there. Why would chamber 2 have a Zyklon B induction hole and no traces, and chamber 3 plenty of traces but no hole?

32) The ceilings in chambers 2 and 4 are low enough so that the Zyklon B induction holes could have been blocked by the victims. What would have stopped the inmates from blocking the holes?

33) The doors to chambers 2,3 and 4 are built to latch from the outside AND the inside. The latches can be opened from either side. Does this suggest that the rooms were used for something other than killing people?

34) Getting back to the issue of hemispherical grids covering the peepholes, it is said that the point of these grids was to prevent the inmates from breaking the glass of the peepholes and causing a gas leak. Yet the hemispherical grids attached to the peepholes on the doors of chambers 2, 3 and 4 are attached on the OUTSIDE of the doors. These grids wouldn't prevent someone INSIDE the room from breaking the glass... but they WOULD prevent someone OUTSIDE the room from doing so. Why are the grids not on the inside? Does this contradict with the statements by Pressac and the eyewitnesses regarding the need for girds in a homicidal gas chamber?

35) The Majdanek camp is built on a hill. At the top of the hill is the camp crematorium. At the opposite end of the camp, at the bottom of the hill, is the "Bath and Disinfection" complex, which houses the gas chambers. From the Nazi's point of view, what was the wisdom in putting the gas chambers at the opposite end of the camp from the ovens, and at the bottom of the hill (after each gassing, the dead bodies would have to have been dragged up the hill, the length of the entire camp, to the ovens)?

36) As the Nazis were preparing to abandon the Majdanek camp, they destroyed the crematorium building. Why were the gas chambers not similarly destroyed? Why would the Nazis leave their weapons of mass murder intact for the world to see? How hard would it have been for the Nazis to destroy the gas chambers, just like they did the crematorium building? At least, shouldn't the Nazis have filled in the Zyklon B induction holes, which serve as direct proofs of homicidal gassings? Either way, the destruction of the crematorium is clear proof that the Nazis had both the time and the ability to demolish buildings in the camp if they wanted to. Why were the gas chambers not demolished?

37) In his book "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers", Jean-Claude Pressac publishes a photo of the Majdanek gas chambers, with the caption "Photograph taken at the Majdanek concentration camp in June 1979, showing one of the disinfestation gas chambers thought to be a homicidal gas chamber." On page 555, he also has this to say about the Majdanek gas chambers: "I am sorry to say, and I am not the only one in the West, that the Majdanek homicidal and/or delousing gas chambers are still waiting for a true historian, which is mildly upsetting in view of the fact that the camp fell into the hands of the Russians intact in 1944." Do these comments suggest that the gas chambers at Majdanek may in fact have been disinfestation gas chambers? At least, don't these comments suggest that there has not yet been a thorough investigation into the purpose of these rooms? *

38 ) To sum up the Majdanek gas chamber issue: If we take Pressac's comments and then factor in the doors that don't lock, the doors that open INTO the gas chamber, the doors with latches that can be manipulated from both the outside AND the inside, the window in gas chamber 1, the room inside gas chamber 1, the lack of any Zyklon B induction hole in gas chamber 3, the lack of any Zyklon B traces in gas chamber 2 (which DOES have a "Zyklon B induction hole"), the heavy blue stains on the OUTSIDE of the building, and the location of the building, at the bottom of a hill, at the opposite end of the camp from the crematorium, is it reasonable to suggest that these rooms were delousing chambers?

* In what can only be considered an unfortunate example of how major disputes between Holocaust historians are shielded from the public, the same room Pressac describes in his book as a "disinfestation gas chamber" is featured in the book "The World Must Know", the official book of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C., written by Museum director Dr. Michael Berenbaum. In that book, Berenbaum describes the room as a HOMICIDAL gas chamber and, what's more, a CASTING of this room was made for display AT THE MUSEUM, as PROOF of the homicidal gas chambers! Thus, in both Berenbaum's book AND in the Museum itself, the ONLY material proof given of homicidal gassings is THIS ROOM, a room Pressac staunchly believes to be a disinfestation gas chamber (in fact, in his Auschwitz book, Pressac actually RIDICULES those who say that this Majdanek room is proof of homicidal gassings, and criticizes everyone from the man who prosecuted Faurisson in France to the Majdanek State Museum personnel for perpetuating a fraud).

But does anyone give a damn that the general public, all the millions, might be receiving fraudulent information? Some might suggest that disputes such as these should be kept private so as not to shake the public's confidence in Holocaust history, or in the Holocaust historians. But don't you think we have a RESPONSIBILITY not to knowingly feed the public falsehoods or unproven claims disguised as unquestioned facts? Don't you think we have a responsibility to be honest about our research? If not, what makes us any different from the "historians" of the Soviet Union, or Hitler's Germany, who knowingly tailored their research to produce a politically expedient conclusion? When the ends begin justifying the means, watch integrity go flying out the window.

As bad as the public misinformation about Majdanek is, the Stalin-esque purging of Pressac's "Auschwitz; Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers" from the official record is worse. This master-work of historiography, once loudly heralded in the press (see enclosed clippings), is NOW nowhere to be found when references to Pressac are made. A recent article in "Publishers Weekly", detailing a forthcoming U.S. Holocaust Museum book containing 29 original essays from Holocaust scholars including Berenbaum and Pressac, not only neglects to mention Pressac's gas chamber book, but seems to suggest that Pressac's conversion from revisionist to gas chamber believer came only recently, as he was researching his just-published "slim volume" about the Auschwitz crematorium. The entire period of the 1980's, which Pressac spent researching his gas chamber book after his "conversion", is omitted.

Yet scholars around the world continue to use Pressac's gas chamber book (if they're lucky enough to have one of the few copies), mainly because, even if one disagrees with Pressac's conclusions, his book is STILL the best (and the only) single source for the blueprints, construction slips, alteration plans, and inter-office communiques regarding the Auschwitz "gas chambers". Neither side in this debate agrees entirely with Pressac...but for the gas chamber supporters, his book is an embarrassment because it IS so thorough. It is the most thorough work yet produced about the gas chambers, yet Pressac cannot find that elusive objective proof of gassings. So now, apparently, the historians have just decided to pretend the book doesn't exist. I've always referred to the Pressac gas chamber book as the most popular book that never existed!

- Hannover

[Thames Darwin]

Cole destroys this Majdanek rubbish. I never cease to be amazed at his acumen. Have any of the usual suspects tried to refute the Majdanek questions? Maybe those charming men at Hollowcause C*nt Rehearsals?

[Dresden]

Thames Darwin asked:

"Have any of the usual suspects tried to refute the Majdanek questions?"

Yes, they most certainly have Mr. Darwin!
Here is a complete "refutation" of David Coles "46 Questions", and his video too:

http://codoh.com/library/document/1008

David Cole: Monstrous Traitor

By Robert J. Newman

Published: 1997-01-01.Note: The following piece was posted by the Jewish Defense League at: http://www.jdl.org/traitor_amer.html.

This piece probably represents the single worst piece of hate ever posted on the World Wide Web. We have reproduced this piece here to help explain what happened and what was done to David Cole. The original links have been disabled. CODOH denounces this and all other forms of hate.

Additional information on the David Cole / JDL Affair

JDL in America
He has managed to stir the gullible masses with hatred, lies and deception. Just like a low-lying snake that slithers from dark place to dark place, he spreads his venom to innocent victims.

This is David Cole, who takes pride in his demonic occupation: Holocaust denier of the Six Million Jews.

Cole is a young Jewish man with an evil plan: To alter history and to deny documented facts. A revolting and horrible monster is this so-called Jew.

He rubs shoulders with the neo-nazi criminals who do their evil deeds for Adolf Hitler and who, to this day, continue to spread anti-Semitism through the guise of Holocaust revisionist denial.

What is a David Cole? Is it a sickness? Is it a mental disease? Is Cole merely a human parasite who clings to his ardent Nazi supporters and friends who back his ideas whole-heartedly? After all, this Cole mania that the media have played on, don't you think it's time that we flush this rotten, sick individual down the toilet, where the rest of the waste lies? One less David Cole in the world will certainly not end Jew-hatred, but it will have removed a dangerous parasitic, disease-ridden bacteria from infecting society.

David Cole laughs in the face of his own people. He takes pride in seeing Jewish Holocaust survivors suffer. He laughs and snickers when someone mentions the words Auschwitz, gas chambers and crematoriums.

Cole's denial is really a denial toward his own people. He hates the very fact that he was born into this world a Jew. But more than anything else, his denial is an enormous crime against humanity.

This despicable low-life beast is worse than the Julius Streichers and Joseph Goebbels. He is more evil than they were-because he is a Jew! This pathetic excuse for a human being is a neo-Nazi traitorous sell-out to his own Jewish people.

An evil monster like this does not deserve to live on this earth. All the news stories about his life only encourage Cole to feed his sick ego even more, bringing attention to his depraved lifestyle. Cole is an abominable psychopath who must be stopped.

The word revisionist is a direct insult to the Jewish community, to Holocaust survivors and to the memory of the millions murdered. It is especially insulting to us Jews who are out to crush these vicious Holocaust-denying Nazis.

Just as we must get rid of this monster, Cole, we must also get rid of the word "revisionism" from our vocabulary. This awful word and Cole, too, must be eliminated altogether. There is no argument. There needs to be no more debates, only the elimination of the Holocaust deniers.

Cole is a sickness, a horrible aberration that is spreading like a cancerous sore. David Cole is being used by and manipulated by the neo-Nazis to further promote their agendas of hate.

He is a Jewish puppet for the Ernst Zundels, Bradley Smiths, Willis Cartos and all the white supremacist, Nazi-loving, murderous gangster thugs. They would love to see all the Jews of the world gassed and incinerated again in the burning furnaces of Treblinka, leaving smoldering ashes in its wake.

This world would be a happier place, indeed, when all the Jew-baiters and Jew-haters have disappeared, especially the most vicious hater of them all, David Cole.

Reward for Information
JDL wants to know the location of Holocaust denier David Cole, pictured above. Anyone giving us his correct address will receive a monetary reward. Contact us through e-mail immediately if you have information leading to the current location of David Cole.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And if that isn't a good enough "refutation", here's the "Nuremburg confession" that David Cole signed with his own blood:

http://codoh.com/library/document/1015

Censorship at Gunpoint: Statement of David Cole
Language English
By David Cole
Published: 1998-01-02.Note: CODOH has not heard from David Cole and does not have absolute confirmation of the validity of the document that follows. We ask that all intelligent readers read this carefully and compare it to David's earlier works. This statement appeared on the JDL website, where it replaced the threats which perhaps led to it.

Prepared January 2nd, 1998

This statement is given in an attempt to set the record straight about my current views regarding the Holocaust and Holocaust denial. As anyone who follows the subject of the Holocaust denial knows, from 1991 until 1994 I was well known in the movement as a Jewish Holocaust denier (a self-described "revisionist"). For the last three years I have no longer been associated with this movement, having realized that I was wrong and that the path I was taking with my life was self-destructive and hurtful to others. I have spent the last few years in silence on the subject of my time with the denial movement, a silence caused mainly by my shame at what I had done with my life and my desire to distance myself from that life.

However, in that shame-induced silence it has been brought to my attention that I have not gone as far as I should have to make a clear and complete public statement in order to set the record straight as to where I stand.

It is my great hope that this statement accomplishes that task.

I would like to state for the record that there is no question in my mind that during the Holocaust of Europe's Jews during World War Two, the Nazis employed gas chambers in an attempt to commit genocide against the Jews. At camps in both Eastern and Western Europe, Jews were murdered in gas chambers which employed such poison gases as Zyklon B and carbon monoxide (in the Auschwitz camp, for example, the gas chambers used Zyklon B). The evidence for this is overwhelming and unmistakable.

The Nazis intended to kill all of the Jews of Europe, and the final death toll of this attempted genocide was six million. This atrocity, unique in its scope and breadth, must never be forgotten.

During my four years as a denier, I was wracked with self-hate and loathing, a fact that many of my critics were quick to point out. Indeed, this self hatred was obvious to most, but I was too blind to see it. The hate I had for myself I took out on my people. I was seduced by pseudo-historical nonsense and clever-sounding but empty ideas and catch-phrases. When my eyes were finally opened, thanks to several good, kind friends who refused to give up on me even at my worst, I was horrified by what I had done. My instinct was to flee and never look back, but I now understand that I owe it to the people I wronged to make a forceful repudiation of my earlier views. I also owe a very large apology, not only to the many people I enraged, and to the family and friends I hurt, but especially to the survivors of the Holocaust, who deserve only our respect and compassion, not re-victimization.

Therefore, to all of the above people, let me offer my most humble and very, very sincere apology. I am sorry for what did, and I am sorry for the hurt I caused.

And just as I must set the record straight concerning my views, it is also incumbent on me to set the record straight regarding the video "documentaries" and media appearances I did from 1991 to 1994. These "documentaries" are merely videotaped garbage filled with self-hatred and pseudo-intellectual nonsense. My "media appearances" were nothing but an embarrassment. My glazed look, specious reasoning, and talking-in-circles during my talk show appearances would have hopefully alerted any astute viewers that this was a man not in touch with reality.

It has been brought to my attention that Bradley Smith is still using one of my videos in advertisements he is running on college campuses. Therefore, I would like to make these additional points: This video is being advertised without my consent, and I denounce this video as being without worth. Bradley Smith is no historian, and denial is no "historical field". Students on college campuses should look elsewhere to find out about the Holocaust. To these students I would say, look to books like Hilberg's "Destruction of the European Jews", Yahil's "The Holocaust", and Dawidowicz's "War Against the Jews" for correct information. If your school library doesn't stock these books, have them order copies. Do not pay any attention to any "David Cole" videos, except to rightly denounce them as frauds.

I am thankful for being given the opportunity to make this statement. This statement is made freely and under no duress, and is quite willingly, even happily, given to Mr. Irv Rubin of the Jewish Defense League for the widest possible distribution. This statement is the most current and accurate compilation of my views, and it supersedes an previous writings, videos, or statements. It is my hope that there will be no more confusion as to where I stand. I thank you for letting me set the record straight.

[Signed]

David Cole

[notarized]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope I was able to answer your question, Thames Darwin, and welcome to the CODOH Forum!

[Thames Darwin]

More of a gun to the head confession than a refutation, huh?

[Dresden]

Yup!

[Stevia]

Thames Darwin:

Cole destroys this Majdanek rubbish. I never cease to be amazed at his acumen. Have any of the usual suspects tried to refute the Majdanek questions? Maybe those charming men at Hollowcause C*nt Rehearsals?

Not only have they not refuted Coles quesitons, they refuse to answer The N.A.F.H. questions as well:

THE MAJDANEK HOLOHOAX

A microcosm of the so-called - “jewish holocaust of WW II”

According to orthodox historians, during WW II the Germans allegedly set up six so-called “extermination centers” in Poland (Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka) where millions of people (mostly jews) allegedly perished in so-called “homicidal gas chambers.” However, the following historical facts exemplify what happens when each individual camp is looked at as a “holocaust within the holocaust” and is investigated by forensic experts. To begin your own investigation of the truth, witness the vacuous legend of the Majdanek “holocaust” collapse before your eyes:


1944 claim - 2 million

Source: Majdanek’s museum director, as reported in: McNeish, James. The Sixth Man: The Extraordinary Life of Paddy Costello. Quartet Books, 2008, pages 313-318.


2005 claim - 78 thousand

Source: Tomasz Kranz, Research Director of the Majdanek State Museum, Gazeta Wyborcza, 12-23-2005.


* * * * *


Kranz’s revision is - 96.1% - lower than the 1944 claim

2,000,000 - 78,000 = 1,922,000

2,000,000 - 3.9% = 1,922,000


Note: Many historians / scholars believe that Kranz’s revised figure is still greatly exaggerated. And, if by chance you have a problem with the figures espoused by the Majdanek museum’s staff, the latest research conducted by forensic historians Graf and Mattogno has lowered the death toll figure “proven” during the first Majdanek criminal trial by - over 97.5%. Also note that not one forensic investigation of Majdanek has ever resulted in the publication of a scientific report that substantiates that any single place at Majdanek was ever used as a “homicidal gas chamber.” Furthermore, not one person has ever been proven to have died via poison gas of any kind at the camp - NOT ONE!


* * * * *


If everything that you’ve just learned about the fraudulently alleged Majdanek “holocaust” is true - and it is - then what do you think you’ll discover when you investigate the other five so-called - “extermination centers” ??? To learn more about these fraudulent, cognitive illusions - please visit: http://www.nafcash.com/


If you still deny the fact that the orthodox Majdanek “holocaust” story is a hoax, then please provide the correct answers to the following very simple questions:


# 1 - Do you have the curiosity, intelligence and courage to hold what you have been led to believe is true about the so-called “jewish holocaust of WW II” up to skeptical inquiry and the scientific method? - Yes. - or - No. - ??

# 2 - Do you have the courage, integrity and character to accept and acknowledge the truths that you learn - even if they contradict your long held beliefs? - Yes. - or - No. - ??

# 3 - Do you deny that: Compared to the findings of forensic historians Jurgen Graf and Carlo Mattogno (Majdanek: A Historical and Technical Study), the original 1944 death toll claim for Majdanek was an exaggeration of over - 4,739 %. - Yes. - or - No. - ??

# 4 - Do you deny that: At Majdanek, there were shower rooms, disinfection areas and delousing gas “chambers” / rooms that were used to keep the inmates clean, kill lice and help stop the spread of typhus and other deadly diseases. - Yes. - or - No. - ??

# 5 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that: At Majdanek, there are places that were once alleged to have been “homicidal gas chambers” which were never used to gas human beings. - ??

# 6 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that: No investigation of Majdanek has ever resulted in the publication of a scientific report that substantiates that any single place at Majdanek was ever used as a “homicidal gas chamber.” - ??

# 7 - The number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - WITH PROOF - who died by means of poison gas of any kind at Majdanek - is no less than _?_.

# 8 - The number of graves - THAT YOU CAN LOCATE / PROVE EXIST - that contain the remains of people who died at Majdanek - is no less than _?_.

# 9 - If your answer to question # 8 was anything larger than - ZERO - then answer this: The largest grave (in terms of the actual amount of human remains tangibly discovered) ever - LOCATED / PROVEN TO EXIST - that contained the remains of people who died at Majdanek - currently contains the remains of no less than _?_ people.

# 10 - The Majdanek museum now admits that _?_ thousand inmates were actually freed.


* * * * *

Please note that - The National Association of Forensic Historians TM ( http://www.nafcash.com/ ) is offering a - $1,000.00 reward - to the first person who can provide the name of just one jew - with proof - who died by means of poison gas in a “homicidal gas chamber” at Majdanek.

Also note that there is another - $1,000.00 reward - that is being offered to the first person who can prove that the correct answer to the above questions - # 5 or # 6 - is not - True.

* The N.A.F.H. offers over - $100,000.00 - in total reward money for its various “holocaust” related archaeological / forensic challenges.