I'm Denierbud, hi.

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

This forum was so helpful to me in making my videos. Thanks to the people who run it and started it! And all the great people who participate! At the time of making One Third I had never had a verbal conversation about revisionism with anyone. I was super secretive (and scared really) because I knew the taboo nature. I would make videos and post on this forum at the same time, i.e work on my video for a couple hours, check the forum, post, then work on my video some more. The forum amped me up for making the videos somehow, helping my thinking, my confidence, my motivation. So in a way I was isolated and in a way I wasn't.

I plan to come out with real name, face, whole 9 yards at some point, hopefully soon. I haven't really done anything in 5 and a half years, but want to come back! I wouldn't mind redoing all the videos. For instance with "Auschwitz, Why The Gas Chambers Are a Myth" I cringe at the "bad design" angle that is the first thing I give for why the gas chambers are a myth. It's true, yes it's true: Not-believable design, but it comes off in a bad way, an unintended way for some viewers. I'd also like to change some things in One Third. I had someone whose name we all know review it years ago, and offer a number of errors and pointed out a lot of things, and I'd like to go back and make those changes.

I always liked it when Kingfisher said stuff about Buchenwald A Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil, because I like those abstracted concepts in that video and would like to do more stuff like that!

I also want to make a new video that I've been thinking about for years.

One thing about coming out with name and face is sometimes in videos you need a "talking head." If you don't have that, then you've got a still frame photo of a document on the screen; that or you're putting text up and it looks like a Powerpoint presentation, and the goal is to have it be as un-powerpoint presentation as possible. LOL. That's why news stations do that: talking head, then footage, talking head, then document, etc.

I have to tell you: the youtube persecution really hurt. There were uploads, mine and other peoples, that were hitting the hundreds of thousands, and were starting to take off into 1000+ views a day, and then deleted. The whole "float to the top in the marketplace of ideas" could have happened, but youtube put the kabash or however that's spelled. LOL.

May the myth break at some point soon.

[borjastick]

Hi CCS. Great message from you, though I already knew it was you and suspect many here did also. That doesn't matter though. What matters is your contribution over the years. Your videos are classic stuff and helped many a revisionist come to terms with the scale and content of the scam that is the holohoax.

What many us would like to know of course is who was the voice over. You? Another or was it a normal voice put through a voice recorder thingymagig?

Looking forward to anything you decide to do or re-do.

Best from Europe.

[Elroy]

2 things to say Bud....

1. Utterly superb work. As we have been discussing- Dumb Portrayal of Evil serves for me anyway as the film that "breaks the spell" (if you can get people to watch it that is)

2. Would it be possible to be given a file copy of "Dumb Portrayal of Evil" complete and with the sound in sync???

May the myth break indeed.

[Hieldner]

Hi Denierbud! I didn’t know you were on this forum and always asked myself if you would continue your work in the time since I saw your videos. They really helped me getting into revisionism, excellent work. Great to hear you want to do some more.

[Hektor]

2 things to say Bud....

1. Utterly superb work. As we have been discussing- Dumb Portrayal of Evil serves for me anyway as the film that "breaks the spell" (if you can get people to watch it that is)

2. Would it be possible to be given a file copy of "Dumb Portrayal of Evil" complete and with the sound in sync???

May the myth break indeed.

Yes, those videos were excellent work. It went into the history of the emergence of the Holocaust Myth, by showing the influence of psychological warfare and propaganda. And Denierbud took a perspective from another angle, which I think wasn't covered by Revisionists until then.

I Would like to contribute to any new work, if that's possible.

[flimflam]

1. Wow. The face behind the mysterious voice ! I can't wait. Your vids played a major role in my learning about the hoax. I was at Berkeley at the time and retraced your steps in the Cal library. Bought a copy of Wiernik. I have a long list of quotes from the book .... e.g.

"However 'freedom or death' was our motto. In the meantime I completed the construction of the blockhouse. To celebrate the occasion, the 'Hauptsturmfuehrer' treated us to rum and sausage."

2. You need a GoFundMe page.

3. It isn't a myth. It is a conscious deliberate massively funded ongoing hoax. Big difference.

[Hannover]

CCS / Denierbud:

Your work is part of the foundation of Revisionist research and free speech activism. I and many others rely on it as a prime go-to resource which obliterates so many of the unsustainable 'holocaust' lies.
We owe you a debt of gratitude.
Keep it coming my old friend.

Auschwitz—The Surprising Hidden Truth
By DenierBud
https://codoh.com/library/document/1527/?lang=en

Nazi Shrunken Heads
A 24-minute free video about lies which justify war
By DenierBud
https://codoh.com/library/document/1528/?lang=en

Buchenwald—A Dumb Dumb Portrayal Of Evil
By DenierBud
https://codoh.com/library/document/1529/?lang=en

One Third of the Holocaust
Watch the Movie -- Calls for Rebuttals
By DenierBud
https://codoh.com/library/document/534/?lang=en

more here:
https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=denierbud

The tide is definitely turning.

Regards, Hannover

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

[Pia Kahn]

Hi Denierbud,

your videos impressed me immensely. They are extremely valuable for revisionism.

I was really struck when you pointed out how psychological warfare works, the psy-ops.... This was a completely new aspect of revisionism.

I always wondered why you never even mentioned the chemical evidence in your Auschwitz video.

"I also want to make a new video that I've been thinking about for years." That's great! I'm really looking forward to it.

I always wished someone could popularize the valuable information churned out in Carlo Mattogno's countless books. Mattogno does great scholarly work, but it is very tedious to read his books.

Then, I think it's time to tackle the holocaust with a bit of humor. As soon as Juergen Graf's book about the eye witness testimony of Auschwitz is published in English, a bunch of crazy stories could be turned into a persiflage. When people start to laugh about something they no longer fear it and many people fear the holocaust.

Those are just my thoughts and wishes.

[Revisionist]

Hi Denierbud!

I actually knew it was you behind this account, but it still want to give out my gratitude to you. One third of the holocaust was the critical video to change my beliefs. Your videos are still shared on the Internet if someone wants to convince people of revisionism. I also like your writing contribution and I always had the impression you knew how to do proper research.

Yes the "bad design" angel is insensitive and may put off viewers to your arguments. But I didn't mind it that much.
The Auschwitz video is missing a lot: Krema I, IV and V, the bunkers and the hole issue. Perhaps you could also put the Hoess confessions in a remake since Castle Hill published a new book covering him from Mattogno.

I was pleased of your announcement since I always thought "One third of the Holocaust" should be remade in HD. Not only for video quality but also a lot of things happened like Carolina Sturdy colls archaeology study.

[Werd]

I plan to come out with real name, face, whole 9 yards at some point, hopefully soon. I haven't really done anything in 5 and a half years, but want to come back!

I would discourage that. Stay anonymous and keep pissing off those who would wish harm upon you. And keep annoying the shit out of holocaust controversies. Especially Andrew mathis who I know wishes the most out of the bunch that he could dox you.
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... enier.html
Maybe start by replying to these guys a little bit and then moving on to the next thing.

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

Thanks all for your comments. I want to respond to everyone, but I worked a lot today at a job and have to get up at 6:30 tomorrow: but real quick to Werd: The hoax isn't breaking fast enough, and time is of the essence. That's why I want to come out of anonymity.

[Hannover]

Do what you feel is right CCS, we're with you.

- Hannover

“It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
- Voltaire

[borjastick]

Do what you feel is right CCS, we're with you.

- Hannover

“It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
- Voltaire

I'm a bit confused at this stage as to why CCS would want to put himself in a degree of danger by revealing his identity. If he is like most of us, just normal Joe public, then I don't see any advantage to him or the cause. If, however, he is well known or famous even, or in a high profile job which would result in large amounts of publicity concerning the lies of the holohoax, then maybe just maybe.

What's clear is the man isn't stupid so he must have thought this through very well. He'll no doubt reveal all in due course but his announcement of new fresh work is excitement enough as it is. Power to his elbow I say.

[Kingfisher]

Whatever your choice Bud, I wish you well, but consider it very carefully. Once your cover is blown there's no going back. Job, family, friends, exposure to personal attack, verbal and possibly even physical. I'm retired so no job risk but I still don't want my grown-up kids to get labelled by association (we have a very recognisable surname) so I stay anonymous.

Consider what happened to Eric Hunt and Black Rabbit. I don't believe either of them were actually turncoats. They were heavily leaned on.

How can we contact you to offer financial support for your work? Last time I did this it was via your YouTube account and I sent it via Bradley Smith.

[Pia Kahn]

Whatever your choice Bud, I wish you well, but consider it very carefully. Once your cover is blown there's no going back. Job, family, friends, exposure to personal attack, verbal and possibly even physical. I'm retired so no job risk but I still don't want my grown-up kids to get labelled by association (we have a very recognisable surname) so I stay anonymous.

Consider what happened to Eric Hunt and Black Rabbit. I don't believe either of them were actually turncoats. They were heavily leaned on.

How can we contact you to offer financial support for your work? Last time I did this it was via your YouTube account and I sent it via Bradley Smith.

I second that. There is no need to put yourself into great danger. The holocaust industry is relentless in the persecution of unbelievers. Remember what happened to Rudolf, Faurisson or Leuchter. Once they know your identity, you are going to be a prime target because these videos are extremely damaging to their cause and they have no conscience.