stinky wrote:I was looking for this clip when I posted my previous comment re Peterson being a fraud.
Here's Peterson debating a "non binary" "transgender" misfit on CBS
Within the clip Peterson objects to the enforcement via punitive measures of what words people use (gender pro-nouns) but is perfectly ok for punitive measures being applied for things we should not say.
And guess what
example Peterson gives as to what things we should be prevented from saying..........
https://youtu.be/SiijS_9hPkM?t=261
What he says is that legislation banning "Holocaust Denial" is different from prescribing absurd pronouns. It isn't. But I guess he can come up with some sophisticated explanation, why it would be.
By giving persecution of Revisionists an OK, he actually opens the can of worms of slippery slope.
That said.... The shear fact that "pronouns" are even a debate is quite telling about the state of civilisation people are living in. It's essentially trying to accommodate mental illness at all cost. Peterson should realise that it is the Holocaust that actually fuels this lunacy.
* NS is evil, because 'muh Holocaust'.
* NS was opposed to sexual degeneracy.
* Hence if you oppose this as well, you are a NAZITHATWANTSTOGASSIXMILLIONJEWS.
You can't win those debates, unless you crush the Holocaust-Dogma first.