Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hektor » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:00 am)

hermod wrote:
Kingfisher wrote:Lack of a signature doesn't mean it's fake. It looks as though it could well be the carbon copy, which would not receive a signature. Hannover is right, though, to say that in the absence of good evidence of provenance it is pretty worthless, as anyone could have typed it.


And anyway the opposite is also true: a signature doesn't necessarily mean a document isn't fake. What kid has never attempted to mimic his/her parents' signature, with a greater or lesser convincing result, in order to conceal bad marks or behaviors at school and so escape punishement? Only the kids always having good marks, I guess. It would be very naive to believe that armies wouldn't employ talented counterfeiters if needed.

No signature means no authentication means no historiographic value as far as attributing a statement to a person is concerned.

hermod wrote:
Isn't much of the evidence presented at Nuremberg of similar poor quality, and isn't that what first led many of us here to smell a rat?


Hard to say with only "certified true copies" of originals nowhere to be found today available to us... :roll:

Same applies here. All this indicates is that the Allies tried to make a statement, but apparently didn't have original worth showing.

As for the claims in the OP, I'm still searching for literature. Right now I try to get some background on Helmuth Groscurth. Facts established so far:
- was in the "resistance" against Hitler.
- captured in Stalingrad / died in captivity 1943
- Source is a supposed diary.

Interesting, we don't read anything about the reasons why the Jews supposedly were shot in the first place. Literature shifts the emphasis on the "children". The ratio towards grown ups seems to suggest that those weren't children, but rather minors below 18 years. And from veterans we of course know that this age group did participate in the partisan war, just as women did.

User avatar
Kingfisher
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Kingfisher » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:12 am)

Hannover.
I said it could be the carbon copy, retained by the sender. It could equally well be a fake purporting to be the carbon copy. I simply commented on the absence of a signature, which, like Hermod, I don't see as relevant. If they wanted to fake the top copy they would fake the signature. If they wanted to fake the sender's carbon copy they wouldn't.

In weighing up its validity, we have to rely on other factors. The absence of a signature is not, of itself, evidence of fraud.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hannover » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:53 am)

Kingfisher wrote:Hannover.
I said it could be the carbon copy, retained by the sender. It could equally well be a fake purporting to be the carbon copy. I simply commented on the absence of a signature, which, like Hermod, I don't see as relevant. If they wanted to fake the top copy they would fake the signature. If they wanted to fake the sender's carbon copy they wouldn't.

In weighing up its validity, we have to rely on other factors. The absence of a signature is not, of itself, evidence of fraud.
I disagree.
- Faking a signature is problematic. If adding a fake signature was that easy it would have done, it's not as easy as it seems though, debunking fake signatures are routinely done by experts. Hardly the same as some kid faking his dad's signature.
- Why would a copy of be retained in the first place? The info. alleged was highly incriminating and any copies would have been stamped secret, it was not. If copies were allegedly sent to others they would have been signed.
- Again, where is the original?
- As previously stated: no copy number, no secretary initials.
- How does this "copy" compare to other Reichenau document copies?

This is a faked document which was created in an attempt to incriminate a deceased man who could not defend himself. Proof of the fakery is not only the unsigned issue, but numerous other factors come into the picture as previously outlined in this thread. We have seen that document forgery along with faked & miscaptioned photos are part & parcel to the 'holocaust' storyline.

It all becomes more ridiculous due to the utter lack of alleged human remains, the utter scientific impossibilities within the narrative.

Want more proof that it's the biggest scam in world history? Here it is:
Scrutiny of the 'holocaust' is banned by law in 17 countries.
Only lies need the protection of government, truth can stand on it's own.

- Thomas Jefferson
- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The Internet is demolishing the false narrative promoted by arrogant Jewish supremacists. From the slaughter of the Palestinians to the lies of Auschwitz, the world is recognizing the dangers of Jewish supremacism.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Kingfisher
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Kingfisher » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 4:40 pm)

I give up! :) It's like a game of Wackamole!

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hannover » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 5:37 pm)

Kingfisher wrote:I give up! :) It's like a game of Wackamole!
Whew! I'm glad. Too old for this sh__. :boxing:

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hektor » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:30 pm)

Hannover wrote:....disagree.
- Faking a signature is problematic. If adding a fake signature was that easy it would have done, it's not as easy as it seems though, debunking fake signatures are routinely done by experts. Hardly the same as some kid faking his dad's signature.
- Why would a copy of be retained in the first place? The info. alleged was highly incriminating and any copies would have been stamped secret, it was not. If copies were allegedly sent to others they would have been signed.
- Again, where is the original?
- As previously stated: no copy number, no secretary initials.
- How does this "copy" compare to other Reichenau document copies?

This is a faked document which was created in an attempt to incriminate a deceased man who could not defend himself. Proof of the fakery is not only the unsigned issue, but numerous other factors come into the picture as previously outlined in this thread. We have seen that document forgery along with faked & miscaptioned photos are part & parcel to the 'holocaust' storyline.
...

Valid questions, but absence of signature and stamps doesn't prove forgery. It's just a few typed pages NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS. Hence no probative value.

Found a book where this is discussed as well.
Image
https://archive.org/details/TheWehrmach ... lframWette

Relevant excerpts:
In 1933 Hitler's new government broke off the joint activities of the Reichswehr and the Red Army, to the regret of more than a few officers. Among them was Colonel Walter von Reichenau, who, having just been named head of the Ministerial Office of the Reichswehr Ministry, occupied a key political position under Hitler's devoted minister of defense, General Werner von Blomberg. Interestingly, Reichenau assured a member of the Soviet embassy staff in Berlin in June 1933 that the Reichswehr stood behind "developing and intensifying German-Soviet friendship, just as in the old days." 51 Eight years later, when the Soviet Union was attacked, Reichenau — by then a field marshal and commander of the Sixth Army — would act as one of the most ardent proponents of racial ideology and the war of annihilation.
One may ask how this may fit the picture, But there comes more:
Racist Orders and Speeches by Hoepner, Manstein, and Reichenau

It is not only the "criminal orders" emanating from the OKW and OKH that document the solidarity between Hitler and the military leaders. The commanders in the eastern theater also issued orders that — most untypically for this form of communication with troops in the field — contained lengthy ideological statements. In addition, copies of speeches that high-ranking commanders delivered to their officers have survived, revealing efforts to prepare the latter psychologically and ideologically for the Russian campaign. Reading the speeches and orders from 1941 of Generals Erich Hoepner, Erich von Manstein, and Walter von Reichenau today, one cannot avoid the impression that they represent a direct echo of Hitler's speech of March 50.

General Hoepner commanded Panzer Group 4, which was scheduled to participate in the eastern campaign. At the beginning of May 1941 — that is, more than a month before the invasion — he explained to his officers how it would be run. His written order offers a perfect example of how various elements of German propaganda could be combined to create an explosive mixture: "Every military action must be designed and executed with an iron resolve to annihilate the enemy utterly and mercilessly. In particular there is to be no mercy for officials of the present-day Russian Bolshevist system."

___ Here is their attempt to translate the typewritten text:

In October 1941 Field Marshal Walter von Reichenau, commander of the Sixth Army in Army Group South, considered it necessary to issue an order specifying how much force was permitted or desired in dealing with the Bolshevist system, since so many soldiers had "unclear ideas" on the subject. In this order, which was intended to reach every soldier in the Sixth Army, Reichenau presented ideological arguments for the goal of extermination: "The most important goal of the campaign against the Jewish -Bolshevist system is the complete destruction of its grip on power and the elimination of Asian influence from our European cultural sphere. This means that soldiers will have to carry out missions that go beyond the traditional one-sided military duties. Here in the East our soldiers must not only engage in battle according to the rules of war, but also be the bearers of a relentless ethnic message and ruthlessly avenge the bestialities committed against us and ethnically related peoples." The order went on to mention the mass executions carried out by the Einsatzgruppen of the SS: "Hence soldiers must fully accept the necessity for the harsh but just expiation exacted from Jewish Untermenschen. This punishment serves the further purpose of suppressing uprisings behind the German front lines, which experience has shown are always instigated by Jews." Reichenau concluded his order with an intentionally vague call to continue the war of extermination: the mission of German soldiers was "ruthlessly to eliminate the treachery and brutality of non-German individuals and thereby secure the lives of German military personnel in Russia." 21
Note that no mentioning is made of the absence of signatures.

Here is Wette's attempt at explanation.
General Reichenau, a fervent National Socialist, had either observed or been informed that the murders of Jews had by no means met with the approval of all officers and soldiers in Army Group South. In one case, Lieutenant Colonel Hellmuth Groscurth of the general staff had attempted to intervene in the killings at Belaya Tserkov', and it is likely that some Wehrmacht officers expressed criticism or even outrage over the mass executions at Babi Yar near Kiev on September 29—30, 1941 (see the discussion later in this chapter). General Reichenau's order thus represents a response to the behavior of the troops during and after these mass killings. At the time of the Babi Yar massacre, Reichenau had executive authority in the Kiev area. His radical and racist order was adopted, incidentally, by Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt, commander of Army Group South. It was also approved by Field Marshal Walther von Brauchitsch, commander in chief of the army, and ultimately the operation was expressly commended by Hitler himself.

Racist Wehrmacht Propaganda for Enlisted Men

Did these messages reach ordinary soldiers in the ranks? What did they believe? As citizens of the National Socialist state, members of the armed forces had been subjected to daily doses of propaganda since the early 1930s. With the start of the Russian campaign, however, the propaganda concerning Jews became more and more aggressive. Messages now spoke of Jews as "the global enemy" who had to be "annihilated." Hitler repeated several times his absurd claim that Jews had begun the war against the German Reich. And the propagandists set out to strengthen the sense of superiority that Germans had long felt with respect to the Slavic peoples to the east, and to found it on racist ideology.

___ I think I come to the Wolfram Wette's description of the alleged "massacre's" a bit later. Since the above is already some good stuff for discussion.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hannover » 8 years 3 months ago (Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:23 pm)

On the 'no Reichenau signature' thing, I still disagree for all the reasons I gave, but moving on ....

Does Wette show any alleged original documents? I looked through it briefly and found none. I did see a citation to proven liar, Israel Guttman.

Wette writes on page 119 that Babi Yar is "fully documented from the perspective of the perpetrators by Sonderkommando 4a and Einsatzgruppen C" because of their pride in good book keeping and via British intercepts / decodes of radio messages which supposedly spoke of killing 34,000 in only two days. As if orderliness proves mass murder, as if a claim of 'hearing Germans talk' is verifiable and reliable. All of which avoids the fact that no humans remains have ever been excavated and shown. Laughable.

As is typical, True Believer Wette does nothing to prove the assertions that are required of him.

Thanks, Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hektor » 8 years 3 months ago (Sat Feb 14, 2015 8:22 am)

Hannover wrote:Does Wette show any alleged original documents? I looked through it briefly and found none. I did see a citation to proven liar, Israel Guttman.
He doesn't and I think for a good reason.

Hannover wrote:Wette writes on page 119 that Babi Yar is "fully documented from the perspective of the perpetrators by Sonderkommando 4a and Einsatzgruppen C" because of their pride in good book keeping and via British intercepts / decodes of radio messages which supposedly spoke of killing 34,000 in only two days. As if orderliness proves mass murder, as if a claim of 'hearing Germans talk' is verifiable and reliable. All of which avoids the fact that no humans remains have ever been excavated and shown. Laughable.....

He doesn't show the "book keeping" nor the intercepted texts neither. Instead he interprets stuff into supposed orders and hearsay.
His solution to not deal with physical evidence has a name: Paul Blobel.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Origin of the Wehrmacht testimonies

Postby Hektor » 5 years 8 months ago (Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:44 pm)

Hannover wrote:....
Wette writes on page 119 that Babi Yar is "fully documented from the perspective of the perpetrators by Sonderkommando 4a and Einsatzgruppen C" because of their pride in good book keeping and via British intercepts / decodes of radio messages which supposedly spoke of killing 34,000 in only two days. As if orderliness proves mass murder, as if a claim of 'hearing Germans talk' is verifiable and reliable. All of which avoids the fact that no humans remains have ever been excavated and shown. Laughable.

As is typical, True Believer Wette does nothing to prove the assertions that are required of him.

He also adds flavor to it by making false statement:
General Reichenau, a fervent National Socialist, had either observed or been informed that the murders of Jews had by no means met with the approval of all officers and soldiers in Army Group South.....


There is no evidence that Walter Reichenau was ever a member of the NSDAP. Perhaps Wette didn't notice, but the pre-emptive strike against the USSR was by no means a vacation trip. So Reichenau merely instructed what any good General would have done in the same position: Take no nonsense from partisans and their helpers. Do what is necessary to ensure the success of once own war effort.

I conclude that Wette merely tries to fit anything he finds, and has remote probative value, into his preconceived narrative. Typical of Court Historians.

User avatar
Hieldner
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 226
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:21 am

Reichenau Order

Postby Hieldner » 3 months 2 weeks ago (Mon Feb 20, 2023 5:37 pm)

The “secret” “Reichenau Order” was published for the first time in Pravda, January 15, 1942, p. 2, omitting the “anti-Semitic passages” of the “original.” As the story goes, “Soviet officers discovered the instructions in the recaptured town of Kalinin (now Tver), and on January 14 the NKVD leader Lavrentii Beria sent Stalin and Molotov a photocopy and a generally accurate Russian translation.” This is according to Karel C. Berkhoff, Motherland in Danger: Soviet Propaganda During World War II, 2012, p. 142. Walter von Reichenau died of a stroke just two days later. Here’s the full passage from the book:

Also in January 1942 Stalin obtained, perhaps for the first time, German documents confirming the killing campaign specifically directed against Jews. Walter von Reichenau, commander of the German 6th Army, had issued instructions on October 10, 1941, on “the conduct of the troops in the East.” Among other things, the Nazi general meant to suppress concerns among the German military about the mass murder of the Jews, such as that committed recently at Kiev’s Babi Yar. “The main goal of the campaign against the Jewish-Bolshevik system is the total smashing of the state power and the extermination of the Asiatic influence on European culture,” he explained. This was a “mission to liberate the German people once and for all from the Asiatic-Jewish danger.” German mass murder in the “East” was both in retaliation and for the sake of security. There the German soldier of necessity was an avenger of “bestialities” committed against Germans and congeneric peoples and thus ought to have “full understanding of the necessity for the harsh but justified revenge on Jewish subhumanity.” Killings were also needed to suppress uprisings in the army’s rear, “which as experience shows always were incited by Jews.” Soviet officers discovered the instructions in the recaptured town of Kalinin (now Tver), and on January 14 the NKVD leader Lavrentii Beria sent Stalin and Molotov a photocopy and a generally accurate Russian translation.

Stalin saw to it that Pravda published the document the next day. There was a facsimile of the entire document but also a faulty translation that omitted all the anti-Semitic passages except “Asiatic-Jewish danger.”

trialsofwarcrimi11inte_0339.jpg
trialsofwarcrimi11inte_0340.jpg
https://archive.org/details/trialsofwarcrimi11inte
To provide soap for Germany … [Prof. Spanner] used, in the mode of the Shakespearean witches, racially and ethnically diverse corpses in his experiments … This defies the popular perception that the soap was made of “pure Jewish fat.” … We may consider this misperception a curious symptom of a purist and essentialist reading, or, at least, note that the tension between essentialism and utilitarianism reaches its peak in this misreading.

– Bożena Shallcross

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Reichenau Order

Postby Hektor » 3 months 2 weeks ago (Thu Feb 23, 2023 6:06 am)

Hieldner wrote:The “secret” “Reichenau Order” was published for the first time in Pravda, January 15, 1942, p. 2, omitting the “anti-Semitic passages” of the “original.” As the story goes, “Soviet officers discovered the instructions in the recaptured town of Kalinin (now Tver), and on January 14 the NKVD leader Lavrentii Beria sent Stalin and Molotov a photocopy and a generally accurate Russian translation.” This is according to Karel C. Berkhoff, Motherland in Danger: Soviet Propaganda During World War II, 2012, p. 142. Walter von Reichenau died of a stroke just two days later. Here’s the full passage from the book:

Also in January 1942 Stalin o....
Stalin saw to it that Pravda published the document the next day. There was a facsimile of the entire document but also a faulty translation that omitted all the anti-Semitic passages except “Asiatic-Jewish danger.”

trialsofwarcrimi11inte_0339.jpgtrialsofwarcrimi11inte_0340.jpg https://archive.org/details/trialsofwarcrimi11inte



I wonder why they left out the "antisemitic' passages?

The thing is of course that many Russians and other subjects of the Soviet Union did notice some correlations, when it came to ethnicity and certain positions in the state apparatus. Bolshevism was never popular there, for obvious reasons. That's why the Soviet folks reacted rather robotically, when someone asked them stuff.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bombsaway and 10 guests