Dugong_Terbang wrote:The reality of the bourgeois position in the German NS almost similar to the American capitalist Neoliberal economy, was its not good for the labours of the Reich ?
A quote by Leon Degrelle Here he compares the German NS economy with the American capitalist Neoliberal economy, it turns out to be very similar, I pick the source from the VHO
How Hitler Consolidated Power in Germany and Launched a Social Revolution by Leon Degrelle
https://web.archive.org/web/20191201141 ... egrelle299 -370.html"Since Hitler, it seems only Ronald Reagan understood this. As President, he realized that restoring prosperity in the United States meant boldly stimulating the economy with credits and drastic tax cuts, rather than waiting for the country to emerge from economic stagnation on its own."
"Hitler always opposed the idea of managing the state economy. He believed in elites. One genius idea," he said, "had more value than a lifetime of hard work in the office."
Just as there are political or intellectual elites, so there are industrial elites. Producers of great ability should not be stifled, hounded by internal revenue services like criminals, or disrespected by the public. On the other hand, it is important for economic development that industrialists are encouraged as much as possible morally and materially.
The most fruitful initiative that Hitler would take since 1933 was on behalf of a private company. He would oversee the quality of their directors, to make sure, and would weed out the incompetent, some of them occasionally, but he also supported the best, those with the sharpest minds, the most imaginative and courageous, even if their political opinions were not. always according to his own opinion."
Here is the related graphic
https://i.postimg.cc/WzzhF0Y7/a37f91db- ... 5e6c67.jpg
You will find that the German working class that experienced the period gives Hitler/NS a far better rating than the other supposedly educated classes. As for the graph, it's from the present administration in Germany, hence one needs to take this with a grain of salt. There is however an explanation for this. And this is, when one considers government spending as part of GDP and that a lot of the social spending in NS-Germany wasn't via the government (after it taxed people's incomes), but via membership contributions and donations. Also, when you have less people on the dole, you can decrease spending on the dole. So one would have to look at the whole picture of spending, not only government expenses from taxes. Efficiency is of course another matter.
What is also interesting is the trend of spending more and more since 1950 in Germany (it's excluded in the graph). Now why would one spend more on "Education".... perhaps because your education is actually indoctrination, just a thought.
