The CODOH Revisionist Forum

After Hitler was elected, the National Socialists began enacting some of the most progressive animal welfare laws ever to be brought into the West:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_we ... zi_Germany

In fact, I think they may have been the most progressive animal welfare laws in any western country.

Regardless of your opinions about the National Socialists, these laws are praiseworthy for their humanity shown towards the welfare of animals.

Also, this contradicts the historical narrative about the National Socialists as being cruel. It seems that quite the opposite was the case, that they were compassionate and moral, and this proves it.

Personally, I've always found this to be fascinating, and I admire them greatly for it!

Here's a good article on the subject:
https://arplan.org/2022/02/19/national- ... al-rights/

Despite this, there are accusations that the opposite was being practiced during the NS government, especially of animals belonging to Jewish families. I've done some research and haven't found any answers to these recent articles, can anyone explain them to me?

https://www.dw.com/en/hitlers-dogs-g%C3 ... a-53698708

TLSMS93 wrote:Despite this, there are accusations that the opposite was being practiced during the NS government, especially of animals belonging to Jewish families. I've done some research and haven't found any answers to these recent articles, can anyone explain them to me?

https://www.dw.com/en/hitlers-dogs-g%C3 ... a-53698708

In the article, it's funny how they try to twist and manipulate what is clearly compassion for animals into something appearing villainous. The fact is that they clearly did have compassion for animals, and this is proven by their animal welfare legislation. The problem is that this is not reconcilable with the image of the cruel National Socialist villains. So they have to come up with ridiculous stories, such as SS commanders throwing people into the bear pits, to accomplish that. It's funny that people really buy into this shit. I live in the US, and people here should know better by now.

Well, these denunciations there are new from the point of view of new German atrocities and may require more time to be analyzed from the revisionist point of view or perhaps it is not even in the long term on the scale of interest of the revisionists to address this issue which is serious but much less than the orthodoxy of the Holocaust. What you can know superficially is that the National Socialists began imposing restrictions on animals under Jewish rule because of the ritual of slaughtering them, which in the National Socialist conception caused suffering to animals, the Jews already say the opposite, that their method is as humanly possible, who is right?

Personally, I think that kosher slaughter is barbaric, but I don't want to debate on the subject. Take a look at this page:
https://investigations.peta.org/kosher- ... ws-israel/

The point that I wanted to make here is that because the National Socialists placed such a priority on advancing animal welfare this suggests a high degree of morality or benevolence. After all, if you want to identify malevolent people than one sure way is to look at their treatment of animals.

This is actually fuel for us revisionists because the Holocaust presupposes a malevolent personality type, or a criminal disposition. But if the animal welfare legislation proves that to be false, which it does, than it makes the Holocaust story harder to believe.