Preliminary report from the pre-investment archeological excavation works at the former German-Nazi extermination camp in Sobibor conducted in the summer and autumn 2014
https://codoh.com/library/document/6985/
PDF: https://codoh.com/media/files/Lato_Jesi ... azurek.pdf
The Results of the Pre-Investment Complementary Archeological Excavation Research Conducted on the Site of the Former Nazi-German Extermination Camp in Sobibór in the Autumn 2015
https://codoh.com/library/document/6984/
PDF: https://codoh.com/media/files/Autumn_2015-SUB-TERRA.pdf
The most striking thing about these reports is that they claim to have excavated and proven the existence of human remains, but do not show us any of them. They do have plenty of color photographs of excavated pits containing no human remains, trinkets, and random rubbish so I guess it's quite apparent that their cameras were functioning quite well.
As explained in the following thread (which I will be updating after I sift through some relevant literature I have collected) there is no such thing as forensically proving the existence of a mass grave without taking photographs of it:
Mass grave excavation guidelines / The "Mass graves don't produce photographed bodies" lie
viewtopic.php?t=12889
It is claimed that the burnt remains of 250,000 people are buried at Sobibor. Why are there no photographs of human remains in any of the reports? Why is there not a single photograph of an excavated mass grave at Sobibor from any of the various digs undertaken in the past 2 decades?
Some photos of human remains in excavated pits from Sobibor do exist, so far I have located the following two images:
The second photo is discussed in this thread:
Photos of mass graves with burnt remains claimed to be from Yoram Haimi's digs at Sobibor
viewtopic.php?t=12806
In that thread, there is also a third photo but it probably does not qualify as a "masss grave" since it appears to only have two skulls and the UN has defined "mass grave" to require at least three people.
Also in that thread, I posted an email response I recieved from Haimi, claiming that the bones in the photo were "collected over a number of years" and moved to the pit "Under Rabbi Shudrich's instruction"
I also received from Haimi another email that I did not post there, which I will quote below:
We are writing about the research in Sobibor and I hope that we publish our research next year. I can't send you a better quality picture, after we publish our research I will send you pictures.
Hopefully Haimi publishes something soon. I do not think we have seen even 1/10th of 1% of the alleged remains claimed to exist at Sobibor.
Here are two of Haimi's maps alleged to be showing the locations of mass graves at Sobibor:
Why haven't any of these alleged mass graves been excavated and photographed, such as in any normal "mass grave excavation"? Or if they have, why all the secrecy around it? The primary reason, according to the literature, that mass grave excavation photographs are withheld is to prevent ethnic animosity from forming as a result. Except in this case the claimed victims (Jews) already believe that the mass graves exist, so providing the images would not be liable to produce any such feelings to manifest against the perpetrators (Germans) where they did not already exist. This happened over 7 decades ago, anyone that could have known the victims or perpetrators is dead.
Here we have a photograph from the "Archives of the Ghetto Fighters house":
Caption: "A glass display case containing ashes and bones of victims of the Sobibor extermination camp."
What do we see? One skull, a few bones in some dirt / sand. "Victims"? It's just looks like the remains of one person.
We also have these core samples:
What appears to be something burnt in one sample, not even enough to be the human remains of one person.
More, from "The Ghetto Fighters' House Museum/Israel/ The Photo Archive":
Caption: "Hair, bones and ashes found on the grounds of the Sobibor extermination camp."
Caption: "Hair, bones and ashes in the area of the Sobibor extermination camp."
Caption: "Pits in the woods near the Sobibor extermination camp, in which victims were buried"
I see what appears to be one bone in the photos above, but it could just be a piece of wood. Something light colored and tiny could be a bone fragment, or just a small rock. And in the last we see a hole that was dug but no human remains.
Muehlenkamp went to Sobibor and took photographs of a small number of bone fragments here with his very long fingernails: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot. ... pdate.html
Once again, it is essentially nothing.
It is claimed that the burnt remains of 250,000 Jews is buried at Sobibor. Aloha Stadium in Hawaii has a maximum capacity of 50,000:
So that is 5 stadiums full of people that were supposedly gassed, burned in giant outdoor pyres (there were no crematoria ovens at Sobibor) and then poured en masse into alleged huge mass graves which were then covered with a thick layer of dirt.
Mattogno, Graf and Kues in their book on Sobibor estimate about 10,000 people could have died en route to, or at Sobibor. This is a mere 4% of what is alleged by the exterminationists, but we haven't even seen physical evidence to support a mere one tenth of the revisionist estimate.
What is quite obvious here is that these excavations are always completely shrouded in mystery. They make a lot of big claims but provide just about nothing to show for it. Why is there not a single photograph from Sobibor [or Treblinka 2 or Belzec] of a single pit which contains the burnt remains of even 1,000 people? There are supposed to be dozens of them, and we aren't even allowed to see a photograph of even one. Not one single pit with the remains of 1,000 people or more at any of these camps, despite the combined total dead supposedly reaching 1.5 to 2 million.
Just go on Google Image search and type in "mass grave excavation" there a countless examples of actual excavations being photographed, it's standard practice, it happens all the time. If you really want to learn, look up "Mass grave excavation guidelines" and see what they say about taking photographs of the remains.
This consistent pattern of shady, secretive, and lackluster "excavations" of these so-called "extermination camps" isn't doing the exterminationists any favors here.
A document, testimony, or confession can very easily be falsified, but a "huge mass grave" is another story...