Thanks NLH, this is priceless.
Some portion of the tape recordings Eichmann made in Argentina were sold by Sassen to Life magazine and published in 1960. Though Eichmann does say that Sassen fabricated / sensationalised (for financial gain) a large portion of that interview. In the Foreword and Preface to this edition, Eichmann declares that this is indeed the only testimony that he wishes to be considered as genuine and not dictated under duress.
So we immediately see contradictions. Sassen fabricated 'facts', but Eichmann stated in the forward & preface that the "testimony" is "genuine".
So why then did Sassen feel the need to fabricate? If what Eichmann said was so damning, why fabricate in the first place?
We still do not have the actual recording for anything here. It's all just more alleged nonsense. The tapes are being hidden for a reason, simple as that.
In the 2nd book (False Gods - The Jerusalem Memoirs) which Eichmann wrote while awaiting sentence in Jerusalem, and which we publish with permission of the Eichmann family, Adolf Eichmann does provide more detail about witnessing the gassing and mass shooting of the Jews. However, both books make it clear that the order for the killing was given verbally by Hitler in late 1941 (this was once Hitler realised that the war against Russia had moved to a defensive war) when Jews in the camps were to be exterminated. Eichmann makes no attempt in either book to conceal this as historical fact, or indeed conceal his role in the deportations. Though Eichmann does make it clear that the initial order from Hitler did come as a surprise to Eichmann’s superiors and to Eichmann himself, and that prior to the receipt of Hitler’s order no preparations for the mass killing of Jews had been implemented. It seems from Eichmann’s testimony that in early 1942 when these mass killings did take place it was mainly carried out by shootings – the Jews being led to the defensive tank ditches, where they were shot by members of the SS. This account is also in accord with the witness statements provided by two German engineers who gave testimony at Nuremberg.
"Awaiting sentence". Let's pretend for a moment that Eichmann made such statements, which as expected are non-specific, generalized by the author because the true specifics are easily dispensed BS, see my posts earlier in this thread.
If one is "awaiting sentence", IOW, in fear for your life, the odds are that one would say something, anything that may be seen as cooperating in order to avoid being executed. 'Hr. Eichmann, please say this or else' Yes Moshe, whatever you want'.
Then we have the verbal order canard from Hitler. As if that order could be then transmitted throughout the German occupied areas, imagine: 'Well the Fuehrer has verbally said to exterminate as many Jews as we can get our hands on, but don't ask me how we can do this, or for and order for the necessary budget and personnel to do this.' This the nonsense we see when in fact there was no order of any kind and the Industry needs to desperately come up with something. I remind our readers of the very real Luther Memorandum, and the Schlegelberger Document which clearly state that the Jewish issue will be handed
after the war. see:
viewtopic.php?t=534"Deportations", ah. Now we're talking. No one questions deportations of Jews, however this is likely another big slip up since Jewish supremacist/Zionists always insist that deportation meant murder of the deported. Eichmann may have simply mentioned deportations which are then laughably considered admissions of mass murder. There is no physical basis for this false assumption. Again, actually hearing the alleged recording should be helpful, but no, the facts are being covered up.
And then we're back to the alleged enormous mass shootings for which no excavations can be shown or verified ... not a single one. And recall that the precise locations are supposedly known, recall the absurdity of the 34,000 Jews supposedly shot & buried at Babi Yar.
"... two German engineers who gave testimony at Nuremberg"? Who exactly? What did they really say? Where is the actual citation for the statements at Nuremberg? We have discussed the Nuremberg Show Trials at length at this forum, incredible what torture and threats can result in.
Eichmann also states that the mass killings of the Jews were stopped in 1944 when negotiations were taking place with the “allies” to exchange 1 million Jews for a number of non-military cargo lorries, and he provides details of the plan and progress of these negotiations. There are however references in both books to the use of gas, and Eichmann does provide some detail during camp visits of witnessing the gassing of Jews, but from Eichmann’s testimony this does not seem to have been the standard means of liquidation for any of the camps. Certainly “The Eichmann Tapes” provides a major stumbling block to the “revisionist” historians who go as far as claiming that the “holocaust” is a myth.
Or did he really say that mass
deportations stopped sometime in late 1944?
"References" to gas & gassings? Oh really? Like the absurd and impossible statements which I cited earlier in this thread?
Once again, actual specifics are being hidden since they are preposterous.
The person who 'translated' / transformed the alleged originals is simply putting words into Eichmann's mouth and they are hiding words which he said which cannot withstand rational scrutiny.
"Stumbling block to the “revisionist” historians ... "? Au contraire, this latest effort is God's gift to those of us who expose the transparent machinations of Jewish supremacist liars. For reasons I stated here and earlier in this thread, this whole affair smells of absolute desperation.
Given that Eichmann makes no attempt in his testimony to conceal his responsibility, or deny his role in the deportations (even after he knew of the order for the killings) one can only conclude that, as he says, he simply wished to put the historical record straight, even though in doing so he must have known it would give a future prosecutor all the evidence they needed to hang him, if only as an accessory to mass murder.
No attempt to conceal? Oh please, we have already seen how that claim is blown away, as does the person in correspondence with NLH, see first paragraph, see my earlier posts in this thread.
They are hiding the original audio recordings. We know why.
'Oh what a tangled web they weave. When first they practice to deceive.'
- Hannover
The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.
