NEW Revisionist Video

[Friedrich Paul Berg]

Look at this video and let me know how it works for you, please! Just mouse-click the underlined link and it should appear on youtube for you!

NEWEST and Stunning! Gassed you say? Never Happened! (video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka-NSHqOn_E

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!

[The Warden]

Excellent work, as always.

52 views when I clicked on it.

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

I don't think it's very good, and a way it's not really a video: There's a feature in digital video editing software, where you can make a still photo move across the screen. But can a person really look at the moving still photo, and also read the subtitle?

However there are some provocative "in your face moments" that work. Like 1:39. "The Nazis warned their would-be victims?!" In that case it kind of works, because not a lot needs to be said.

I think a believer is not going to have any idea of what's going on for the most part. If you had a voice-over saying the subtitles, and still images, a person would have a better chance at grasping the concepts.

[The Warden]

I don't think the point of the video is to explain much of anything at that moment, but rather to capture attention and get people to FPB's site where it's explained.
It's essentially a commercial.

Perhaps FPB can verify one way or another.

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

I think the moving still image captivates the eye. It's an instinct to be captivated by it and follow it across the screen. Who is that PBS darling who does documentaries on the Civil War, and baseball etc.? He always has the still image moving across the screen. One advantage to it, is you can show a larger image, like if you want to see expressions on peoples' faces in a photo.

But if you ever use a still image of text and move that. Like a page of Don Heddesheimer's book, or some such thing, and pan that across the page, I think info transferring to the viewer is nil. The maker knows what's on that page and the viewer doesn't. But maybe the viewer will get the message that there are a lot of sources they need to read. So that might be good.

But moving images might be a poor use of digital video technology. In the 1960's if someone showed slides in their living room of a vacation, would they have ever opted to have the slides moving across the screen?

Some of the writing could be better also: 1:41: "German camp inmates' clothes were hung out to dry after delousing" The follow up should be "the allies then portrayed the clothes as belonging to people recently gassed." But instead it just says "delousing not mass murder."

The problem is if you have narration, you can't have music of this sort. The music conveys to me an urgency, and a myth that is warping the personality of the German people. Almost playing on the Hollywood caricature, or internalizing that. But not speaking German, this is more information that is lost on me.

[Friedrich Paul Berg]

I appreciate all of the comments above. They are constructive and food for much thought for the future.

The Warden has it right when he suggests that I am NOT trying to explain the revisionist position with this video--but merely to attract attention to my website where I do go into detail. It is a bit like a GEICO commercial which tries to achieve name recognition and not much more.

In any event, better videos are needed to really get through to people. Hardly anyone reads books any more--and for good reasons. It is the pictures we have of the concentration camps at the end of the war that are the biggest hurdle for revisionists--and NOT books by Hilberg, or Elie Wiesel, or anyone else. It is essential that we, at the very least, show pictures that convey the revisionist message which is the real truth about the war.

The REAL mass murderers, the real genocidal maniacs, the real war criminals were NOT the Nazis--but the victorious Allies, especially the Americans. That is vital message which the world has to learn or else we will certainly have a thermonuclear world war and a Final Solution to everything. America really is a luxury lunatic asylum for serial mass murderers! America is the big problem for which there seems no solution at all.

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

It is the pictures we have of the concentration camps at the end of the war that are the biggest hurdle for revisionists--and NOT books by Hilberg, or Elie Wiesel, or anyone else. It is essential that we, at the very least, show pictures that convey the revisionist message which is the real truth about the war.

That's a good theoretical framework.

[Sannhet]

Here is a still of the image CCS mentioned as being especially effective:



What is the background of this photo? Where is it? Is that a U.S. soldier?

[gbrecht]

I believe Dachau and or Bergen Belsen.

[Sannhet]

gbrecht, I suspected it'd be one of those.

I'd like more specific information on that specific photo. Especially:
Was it ever published with the explicit or implicit argument that it was a photo of an extermination-gas-chamber?

..
It's one of the more fruitful areas of Holocaust-Revisionism to point this out: So many western camps were originally treated as Auschwitzes, too. Including Dachau**. They were said to have housed gas-chambers, where prisoners were exterminated. All these claims were investigated and refuted by open inquiry (to the USA's great credit, it does allow open inquiry, e.g. CODOH would be illegal in much of Europe)... All such fanciful claims were refuted, except those in the six camps that fell in Stalin's new puppet of Red-Poland (Auschwitz, Treblinka, Madjanek, etc.) where open inquiry did not exist.



** -- Incidentally, these seems to be the accepted death figures for Dachau even by Exterminationists:

(From "The Journal of Historical Review", Vol. 9 no. 4)

i.e., no Exterminationist seems to be cling to any belief of mass killings at Dachau (as was reported/believed in mid-1945), as far as I know.

[Malle]

Here is a still of the image CCS mentioned as being especially effective:



What is the background of this photo? Where is it? Is that a U.S. soldier?

The photograph below, which was taken by T/4 Sidney Blau on April 30, 1945, shows a US soldier standing in front of one of the disinfection chamber doors. Note the word "Gaszeit" on the door, which has since been repainted. Gaszeit means gas time in English.

US soldier stands in front of disinfection chamber door

The caption which the US Army put on this photo was as follows:

Gas chambers, conveniently located to the crematory, are examined by a soldier of the U.S. Seventh Army. These chambers were used by Nazi guards for killing prisoners of the infamous Dachau concentration camp.

[Friedrich Paul Berg]

An important picture from Dresden 1945 just appeared on RODOH, presented by Roberto Muehlenkamp of all people. It matches those pictures from Belsen and Dachau in horror. (Click the image for an enlarged view)



When I began my studies as a revisionist more than thirty years ago, my objective was at most to acquit the Germans of charges of deliberate mass murder. I never imagined that I would come to despise the United States and Britain for the horrendous crimes they had committed. But that is where I am today.

Holocaust revisionism is a kind of anti-Americanism--and rightly so. The real genocidal maniacs were, and still are, the Americans. The real "butchers of humanity" were, and still are, the Americans. How can one possibly NOT be anti-American when one learns what America and its allies actually did during and after WW2. How can one NOT be anti-American when one sees the blind and stupid self-righteousness that drives America even today? If these monsters continue as they have, ever greater disasters must follow. Can one appeal to any smidgen of a conscience in them? Frankly, I doubt it. They have no conscience.

See: The Forgotten Holocausts http://www.youtube.com/user/VeraIcona100#p/u

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!

[gbrecht]

Hmm, FPB which group of people influences American politics among other things

[trevor]

It must be very frustrating for the Holocaust believers that there is more evidence for the war crimes committed by the Allies than there is for the Holocaust gassings ” the most documented crime that ever happened”.

Let’s take the firebombing of Japanese cities as an example. We have the order, we have footage of the actual crime (burned cities) and we have credible witnesses. And that is just what I know. There is probably much more evidence.

The same comes for Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Can you produce this kind of evidence for the alleged gassings in any of the alleged German extermination camps?

Because if you cannot, then other kind of evidence has to be produced. Such as remains of the alleged millions of gassed bodies.

No, we cannot prove that this particular pile of dead bodies in Dresden after the bombings did die as a result of the bombings.
But it is proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that the actual crime- bombing of Dresden- happened.

And yes you are right. This pile of bodies does not consist of bodies only but of all kinds of flammable stuff. I wonder why they needed any fuel to burn bodies in Dresden because the Nazis in the extermination camps knew how to miraculously burn bodies without any fuel (at least the witnesses claimed so). BTW lots of victims of firebombings were half burned already.

[The Warden]

[Balsamo's post of 2/7/11, referred to below, was accidentally deleted, I've re-posted it even though The Warden quotes it. Apologies. - Moderator3]

Mister Berg, i challenge you

Can you give one proof, one single proof that those bodies are not fake ?
A autopsie maybe, that states those bodies - if real - died from an Allied air raid, and not from Typhus ?
one NAME, with a copy of his original ID of one of the corpses to prove that those are Germans ?
Did we find the mass grave where those corpses were burried ?

What i see could be only some clothes from a Supermarket that did not sell well, along with some mannequins that the burned out store at the rear of the picture
could not store anymore...Please prove me that those are German citizens killed by Allies' criminal action.

Mister Berg, i challenge you

Can you give one proof, one single proof that those bodies are not fake ?
A autopsie maybe, that states those bodies - if real - died from an Allied air raid, and not from Typhus ?
one NAME, with a copy of his original ID of one of the corpses to prove that those are Germans ?
Did we find the mass grave where those corpses were burried ?

What i see could be only some clothes from a Supermarket that did not sell well, along with some mannequins that the burned out store at the rear of the picture
could not store anymore...Please prove me that those are German citizens killed by Allies' criminal action.

This kind of post stems from frustration. Trying to make Revisionists live up to the same standards of proof they ask of Hoaxters is the oldest method used to divert away from the fact they simply have no evidence of the "main weapon" allegedly used in the camps, the "evil gas chambers". The problem with Balsamo's request is no one questions the way the civilians of Dresden were killed. There has never been any reason to doubt the method used to kill them. No one has ever denied the method (including the Allies who dropped the bombs), nor has anyone claimed the Allied bombing raid was anything more than war-time activities (even if people do think the Allies committed a war crime by doing so since the war was essentially over at the time).

As to the wise ass undertones of Balsamo's requests, the difference being: There ARE fabricated photos from Hoaxters. There ARE NO mass graves to substantiate the Hoaxter claims. There ARE NO autopsies showing cause of death to substantiate gassing claims. There WAS a Typhus epidemic at the time of deaths of many Jewish prisoners. There WAS Allied bombing raids cutting off supply trains to the camps which led to starvation. And there ARE commonly known frauds such as Elie Wiesel who are basically identity thieves trying to end-around the actual documents which show their stories are bogus.

I suppose in the end, the best answer to Balsamo's request would be to simply return the favor by using Hoaxter logic as a response:
(I type this only as an example)

Balsamo, the Dresden incident is "historical fact", the burden of proof is on you to show it didn't happen the way we say.

Can you show documents proving those are supermarket clothes?
Can you show doctors performing autopsies in the area at the time?
Can you show shipments of mannequins being made to Dresden at the time?


It goes on and on, but the difference is Revisionists actually can show what they claim, while Hoaxters scramble.