Heavy Updates from Castle Hill (2022)

[DissentingOpinions]

Otium: It's better if CODOH & CHP focuses on revisionist material on National Socialist history, but revising NS beliefs for the sake of uncovering the truth is a bad idea, since historical revisionism as a whole is about showing what actually happened. The case for the truth is made in the form of books and essays, most of which are featured on Inconvenient History & Barnes Review. I should've been more clear about my reply to you in the other thread instead of snapping at you, so I apologize.

[Hektor]

I hope that Germar is doing well. It makes me feel terrible to know of his continual plight. He's done so much good for the world, and has sacrificed so much of his life. Given his efforts, and others like Sylvia Stolz, I'm often asking myself: what can I do to help? Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I've thought about starting a local revisionist group, or opening a small revisionist dedicated bookstore.

So it's Direct harrassment and persecution on the one side (for Germar Rudolf) and then Cancel Culture to damage business activities.
To me it seems that they now can get away easier with persecution of dissent than this would have been the case decades back.
Additionally 'canceling' tactics are used. No direct threat of state power, but manipulative power via implicit economic threats are used.
This leads me to the question on how to react to this in order to be able to do publishing and distributing of Revisionist Materials in the future.


Is there any German article on what happened to Germar Rudolf? I'd love to post a few things on this to some German forums, which I frequent. One can not "Deny the Holocaust" on those forums, but one can post info on the 'persecution of Revisionists'. This also turned out to be the most likely mind changer on those entangled into believing the 'Holocaust Myth'. My experience with this is divided though.
1. Hardcore Holocaustians have developed a 'Serves him well' attitude, when they hear/read that Revisionists are persecuted.
2. There is however also those that while they believe the Holocaust to be true (they 'trust the science'), they don't think that dissent to this should be in any way persecuted.
3. Not all that say so are sincere, though. I've also noticed incidents of lip-service on this. They probably think that open support for jailing revisionists or other dissenters would make them look bad. The Holocaust also does seem to attract hypocrites more than average issues. Must be the religious flavour it got.
4. There is those that definitely would like to see freedom of research and expression on historical matters including the Holocaust. They may believe it, at least in part. But there is also those that noticed that there is something wrong with the narrative.
5. A lawyer friend of mine ones told me that to him 'the fact that they are persecuting revisionists and the length they are willing to go with this, indicated to him that the narrative is fundamentally flawed'. Probably studied, when being conversant in Logic was still a requirement to study a law degree and pass for it.

[EtienneSC]

(Quote)

The Year 2022 at Castle Hill Publishers
December 15, 2022

Our attempts at establishing a printing, warehousing and order-fulfillment solution in the UK/Europe for our English-language material hit unexpected resistance when we realized that many British printers are now mortally afraid to get involved in the production of printed matters that could violate Britain’s 2017 anti-revisionist law. Although that law requires that “Holocaust denial” happens concurrently and in conjunction with disparaging the victims, which is something Caste Hill does not do, any printer accepting our printing jobs would be legally required to thoroughly read and correctly assess all our material before printing it to make sure it does not contain anything legally hazardous. No printer will invest that amount of time and effort. They simply turn down the job, and that’s the end of that…

I am not aware of any such thing as a "British 2017 anti-revisionist law". The nearest thing I can think of is the case law around being "grossly offensive" under the Communications Act 2003, which in two instances, one recent, has been extended, most recently to cover a satirical song that made light of Holocaust eye-witnesses (the Chabloz case).

English law operates through precedent in interpreting legislation and even in its absence. Those attempting to suppress inquiry and freeze scholarship in the state it was in the 1970s are keen to talk up such limited precedents as exist with a view to extending their application. Let's not help them by making unneeded concessions.

Let's look at another revisionist loss: Carlo Mattogno is retiring from revisionism. Holocaust Handbooks Volume 50 "The Neuengamme and Sachsenhausen Gas Chambers—With a Focus on British Investigations for the Tesch Trial", was a surprise release this year. The Real Auschwitz Chronicle is expected to be released next year in September. Mattogno doesn't have any other new volumes in the works, so this could be it.

Mattogno's critique of Danuta Czech's Auschwitz Chronicle is already published, certainly as a pdf. It turns out she was a Polish communist historian who provided background analysis for the Auschwitz trial in Germany in the 1960s. The Chronicle was the result of this and is well worth critiquing. I was told that the current project was a Holocaust Encyclopedia to be written by a team including Mattogno and to include revisionist discoveries. That was before Germar Rudolf's current difficulties arose.

[DissentingOpinions]

(Quote)

The Year 2022 at Castle Hill Publishers
December 15, 2022

Our attempts at establishing a printing, warehousing and order-fulfillment solution in the UK/Europe for our English-language material hit unexpected resistance when we realized that many British printers are now mortally afraid to get involved in the production of printed matters that could violate Britain’s 2017 anti-revisionist law. Although that law requires that “Holocaust denial” happens concurrently and in conjunction with disparaging the victims, which is something Caste Hill does not do, any printer accepting our printing jobs would be legally required to thoroughly read and correctly assess all our material before printing it to make sure it does not contain anything legally hazardous. No printer will invest that amount of time and effort. They simply turn down the job, and that’s the end of that…

I am not aware of any such thing as a "British 2017 anti-revisionist law". The nearest thing I can think of is the case law around being "grossly offensive" under the Communications Act 2003, which in two instances, one recent, has been extended, most recently to cover a satirical song that made light of Holocaust eye-witnesses (the Chabloz case).

English law operates through precedent in interpreting legislation and even in its absence. Those attempting to suppress inquiry and freeze scholarship in the state it was in the 1970s are keen to talk up such limited precedents as exist with a view to extending their application. Let's not help them by making unneeded concessions.

Let's look at another revisionist loss: Carlo Mattogno is retiring from revisionism. Holocaust Handbooks Volume 50 "The Neuengamme and Sachsenhausen Gas Chambers—With a Focus on British Investigations for the Tesch Trial", was a surprise release this year. The Real Auschwitz Chronicle is expected to be released next year in September. Mattogno doesn't have any other new volumes in the works, so this could be it.

Mattogno's critique of Danuta Czech's Auschwitz Chronicle is already published, certainly as a pdf.

According to the donation page at CODOH, this is only a first draft & Mattogno wants to fill the book in with more information. As for the Holocaust Encyclopaedia, I don't consider it an actual research endeavor, since the bulk of it will contain revisionist material alongside the general history.

[The_Problem]

You CAN'T buy revisionist books anymore! You can't use a card to pay for it in the first place.

That was not my interpretation of this set of updates. My understanding was that any order fulfillment is taking place out of the US, for now

The context of the update was not the consideration of my response to you. Factually speaking, irrespective of what you read in the update- you cannot..
(a) purchase any revisionist book with any form of bank card, credit or debit.
(b) purchase any revisionist book outside the US (or miraculously Canada, for now)
(c) you cannot even purchase a PDF file of a book with a simple transfer if you live outside America!

^This has nothing to do with what anybody from CODOH is writing, it's reality. Trust me I know I'm trying to buy one

Somberly though this is probably as serious as the situation has ever been for revisionism/correctionism.

[Hektor]

You CAN'T buy revisionist books anymore! You can't use a card to pay for it in the first place.

That was not my interpretation of this set of updates. My understanding was that any order fulfillment is taking place out of the US, for now

The context of the update was not the consideration of my response to you. Factually speaking, irrespective of what you read in the update- you cannot..
(a) purchase any revisionist book with any form of bank card, credit or debit.
(b) purchase any revisionist book outside the US (or miraculously Canada, for now)
(c) you cannot even purchase a PDF file of a book with a simple transfer if you live outside America!

^This has nothing to do with what anybody from CODOH is writing, it's reality. Trust me I know I'm trying to buy one

Somberly though this is probably as serious as the situation has ever been for revisionism/correctionism.

Let's say there is a lot of obstruction. And Revisionists outlets/publications/products are on the radar of the well connected and powerful.
One needs to ask why. What possible interest could a banker, distributor or service provider possibly have in suppressing Revisionist materials or the distribution thereof?

If it is drivel, they could simply ignore it... Nothing to fear there. There was already confrontation about this in the past of course (I'm thinking about the campaign against Walendy's 'Truth for Germany'). The argument against Walendy and his book was. That the book is so well written... Young people could not possible see that this is untrue. Eh yeah. So there can be literature that is done so clever people will struggle to see whether this is true or not? To me that sounds like a blanket argument to ban anything though. And well, wouldn't that mean that Holocaust Education materials are done so cleverly that students and the audience "don't notice that they are being deceived and lied, too".

So the argument works more than one way, here. But the choice indicates that they are privileging certain views on history, while disparaging others. Except for Jewish interest in the matter.... There may be other interests as well. And that's simply, when people realize what scam the Holocaust was/is, they automatically will question a lot of more things. Any establishment doesn't want this, not at all. They depend on institutional trust of people, whether they are worthy of this or not. It's a matter of social control and to some extent 'social peace' in societies as well. But there is of course particular interest, too. Academics have interest in the general reputation of academia. When the history departments become known to have taught their students malicious lies for decades, this will discredit them almost completely. "How could you allow that students were taught such malicious lies about the Germans for decades?"... And well, it will also demonstrate that academic freedom, freedom of enquiry and research, as well as freedom of expression on university campuses and the neutrality and objectivity of academia are a Myths. The point being that academics insist on being reliable sources for the truth, based on their objectivity, neutrality and rationality. Now, if this wasn't granted for a major part of the 20th century and the lack of it persisted even into the 21th century, why consider academics a reliable source then. For that matter it isn't NS, Jews or the Holocaust that is at question here. The very essence of the scientific method and application of scienticity in other fields is what the issue is about. If you want Rationality and respect for Truth was what gave the Occident it's edge in politics, economics, culture. etc. (very much to the benefit of non-Westerners as well). If that isn't granted anymore peace and prosperity will be in danger and trouble can be expected.

Now a word still on bankers. They don't have an interest into ordinary people understanding their practices (and finances) at all. And that's independent of them being Jewish or not. The Holocaust and the protected status of Jews as well as the Anti-Semitism taboo is however very useful to them. That way anybody critiquing the banking practices and political influence of banks can be branded as an 'anti-Semitic' conspiracy theorist.... Which incites most people to keep a distance to him. So they may not give a rats ass about Hitler or the Holocaust as such, but they still may have an interest into people's views about this.

[Lamprecht]

Not only is there the issue of fresh blood to keep revisionist projects alive, but there's also the issue of making such efforts available to people. To some degree it has to be profitable for obvious reasons.

I think we all knew that Germar and Mattogno would have their day, but nobody would've thought that it'd be so soon. I'm shocked at this news, and quite dismayed mainly because there's still so much more that could be done in terms of research. I hope that Mattogno keeps writing, and I hope Germar can find a way to bounce back.

In terms of the research, there is not a lot left to do - or, I could say, that is necessary to do. The "Holocaust" narrative has been completely destroyed. Some people try to differentiate between "denial" and "revisionism" with the first being people that just don't believe it, and the second being people that actively discuss the topic. Well, if we're going to go by that distinction, "revisionism" may not be growing rapidly but "denial" certainly is.
That's not just something I've noticed, but it's also something that Jews doing surveys of America's youth are reporting. Of course we might not be able to trust their surveys, since Jews just use that stuff to complain about a need for more "Holocaust education" (which actually is counter-productive for them; why would young people even care about that?)
We can also just look at their behavior, which is to continue censorship. Canada even banned "Holocaust denial" earlier this year. If they didn't think it was a big deal, why would they go ahead and do that? It makes people more curious.

White House issues statement to "counter antisemitism" and reject "Holocaust denial"
viewtopic.php?t=14805

I think the coronavirus hysteria lead to a massive level of distrust in "the experts" in society. People that were skeptical either saw themselves get censored or witnessed dissenting voices getting censored for merely sharing their opinion. Forcing moderate skeptics to go use alternative, free-speech platforms increases their expose to other censored ideas and content.

Mattogno is writing a new book on Auschwitz. This is good news, but if you think about it, another book on Auschwitz isn't really going to convince any newcomers to question the H narrative. When it comes to younger people, a meme showing a wooden door or the unattached chimney actually convinces more people, like it or not. The ones that want to do more research won't have any trouble so long as they can find CODOH/HolocaustHandbooks despite Google's censorship.

I've said it before on this forum many years ago, but if revisionism wants to take a big leap forward (in the USA at least) it has to be endorsed by a large number of Blacks and/or Hispanics. Blacks especially, as they have a special, overt status of being above criticism - except when they talk about Jews. Then it is revealed that Jews are actually the ones that are truly above criticism, and they do not actually identify as "White" - the supposedly most privileged racial/ethnic group in America - instead they try to claim the status of the most oppressed group. But anyone can see that this is not the case. It's also very difficult to make Blacks care about the "Holocaust" when they have been taught that they were persecuted and mistreated because of their pigmentation for 400 years, and that the only reason they have not achieved what Whites have achieved is due to pure hatred of the skin.
So why would they care about the alleged suffering of Jews on another continent 80 years ago when they not only got a country out of it, but are now the most privileged group in the USA (which, according to their story, literally saved them from Hitler)?
It only seems plausible if it's made out to be that the Jews are part of a victim group - along with Blacks and other non-White groups - that are suffering due to "White supremacy."

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that this shouldn't be seen as any sort of major setback for revisionism if the goal is for more and more people to begin questioning the official narrative.
Consider that Ye going on Alex Jones' show and declaring that he doesn't believe in the "Holocaust" has led more people to the truth than if Holocaust Handbooks managed to publish 5 additional books. These books are important for humanity's understanding of the event going into the future, sure. And for the small minority of skeptics that want to learn more about it, it's a great resource.
But as a practical matter, there are other avenues to convince the public. Remember that most of them have 2-minute attention spans as a result of smartphone-induced ADHD.

Really, ask yourself. Are the exterminationists with all of their resources focusing on writing a bunch of books every year? They're still referencing books from decades ago. They really aren't doing that.

[Otium]

In terms of the research, there is not a lot left to do - or, I could say, that is necessary to do. The "Holocaust" narrative has been completely destroyed.

[...]

Mattogno is writing a new book on Auschwitz. This is good news, but if you think about it, another book on Auschwitz isn't really going to convince any newcomers to question the H narrative. When it comes to younger people, a meme showing a wooden door or the unattached chimney actually convinces more people, like it or not. The ones that want to do more research won't have any trouble so long as they can find CODOH/HolocaustHandbooks despite Google's censorship.

[...]

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that this shouldn't be seen as any sort of major setback for revisionism if the goal is for more and more people to begin questioning the official narrative.
Consider that Ye going on Alex Jones' show and declaring that he doesn't believe in the "Holocaust" has led more people to the truth than if Holocaust Handbooks managed to publish 5 additional books. These books are important for humanity's understanding of the event going into the future, sure. And for the small minority of skeptics that want to learn more about it, it's a great resource.
But as a practical matter, there are other avenues to convince the public. Remember that most of them have 2-minute attention spans as a result of smartphone-induced ADHD.

Really, ask yourself. Are the exterminationists with all of their resources focusing on writing a bunch of books every year? They're still referencing books from decades ago. They really aren't doing that.

I do agree with you for the most part. However I would say that even though there might be a surface level propaganda effect of someone like Ye going on Alex Jones and saying what he's said, and though a general atmosphere of distrust may have formed among the public against the authorities, this isn't really enough. It needs staying power and growing power; it needs people who understand the facts, and the facts need to exist in order to be understood. Without the revisionist books and articles there would be no anchorage. So even though these events have done more than 5 or 50 Holocaust Handbooks to merely convince people of the falseness of the traditional and ever evolving Holocaust orthodoxy, it's still vital that such books exist because there needs to be a rock solid foundation with which to rely upon so people actually understand why it's wrong.

You're right that the exterminationists rely, mainly, on antiquated studies from decades ago to write new books, but I cannoth help but think that's slightly missing the point of what's going on here. Most layman don't know how often sources are recycled, and how old dogmas are repackaged. What's important to the academic propaganda apparatus is the illusion of academic progress in these historical fields. In other words, a sense of vitality which is continously ongoing and which bombards the public with new books and articles from all directions that all come to the same old conclusions. This gives them an immense sense of authority. If they can, for propaganda effect write the same shit over and over again, and then attack revisionists who cannot and will not reply, it gives off the impression that revisionists are weak and cannot respond. This isn't true, but that's not the point, the point is really who has the last word. The struggle then, in my view at least, is to keep defending and proposing new ideas and theories perhaps not yet thought of, or emphasising new/old facts.

Warding off attack, defending, is always the goal; and that means reiteration again and again. The job of the revisionists should be to prioneer, but also to constantly correct the establishment whenever they blunder and to emphasise such blunders at every possible moment to discredit them, and expose their falseness. This is what these people do to revisionists.

If I recall right the HC bloggers had even written refutations of Mattogno which he many not have even seen (these articles from 6 years ago). I believe it was on the response to van Pelt. In any case I emailed Germar to see if Mattogno was aware, and the former didn't know, but assumed he was. The problem with this is that anyone who is looking to discredit revisionism will side with whoever has written what is most recent, particularly if it's from the exterminationist side of things who are given free reign just to say whatever they want without fear of correction and rebuttals.

[Hektor]

In terms of the research, there is not a lot left to do - or, I could say, that is necessary to do. The "Holocaust" narrative has been completely destroyed.
.....

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that this shouldn't be seen as any sort of major setback for revisionism if the goal is for more and more people to begin questioning the official narrative.
Consider that Ye going on Alex Jones' show and declaring that he doesn't believe in the "Holocaust" has led more people to the truth than if Holocaust Handbooks managed to publish 5 additional books. These books are important for humanity's understanding of the event going into the future, sure. And for the small minority of skeptics that want to learn more about it, it's a great resource.
But as a practical matter, there are other avenues to convince the public. Remember that most of them have 2-minute attention spans as a result of smartphone-induced ADHD.

Really, ask yourself. Are the exterminationists with all of their resources focusing on writing a bunch of books every year? They're still referencing books from decades ago. They really aren't doing that.

,,,,

Warding off attack, defending, is always the goal; and that means reiteration again and again. The job of the revisionists should be to prioneer, but also to constantly correct the establishment whenever they blunder and to emphasise such blunders at every possible moment to discredit them, and expose their falseness. This is what these people do to revisionists.

If I recall right the HC bloggers had even written refutations of Mattogno which he many not have even seen (these articles from 6 years ago). I believe it was on the response to van Pelt. In any case I emailed Germar to see if Mattogno was aware, and the former didn't know, but assumed he was. The problem with this is that anyone who is looking to discredit revisionism will side with whoever has written what is most recent, particularly if it's from the exterminationist side of things who are given free reign just to say whatever they want without fear of correction and rebuttals.

Their task: Proving the case for six million gassed Jews.
They do: Find fault with those that question that thesis.

That's almost priceless to see, since they are actually demolishing themselves with this. Good commentary on this should change minds on the matter. I got a feeling the number of those that doubt the charade is actually growing. They don't necessarily dismiss it entirely, but probably view the matter with suspicion. They probably don't egage further, because they don't see the purpose or utility for this. Have they never wondered, why it is pushed so vehemently and obviously with astronomic resources put into this?!


Imagine the same technique applied to pro Holocaust work. Simply cherry pick stuff that looks like it is wrong and then dismiss their story as rubbish. They never would accept this standard being applied to them... Yet they use it over and over on people that wrote something they don't like. The thing is, the more that is written, the more fault you can find with it. That's a statistical/mathematical certainty. That's why I prefer hitting on the key issues only. Demanding straight answers to simple questions, which they virtually never provide exposing that they don't have the required proof for their thesis. I think the more experienced Holocaustians also know this, hence they avoid responding altogether.

To them it turned out that rhetorical rescue devices are the most efficient way to peddle their story. Appeal to authority and 'expert consensus', Assuming what needs to be proven, pointing to phenomena that don't really prove the thesis, but don't disprove it neither. And well attacking the reputations of their critics. What they do should abhor any rational person that values hard evidences for claims. Those with insight in logic and argumentation theory or scientific methodology should pretty quickly see, that the Holocaustians actually don't have anything worth showing. That's why the whole subject had to be made politically and emotionally charged so academics and highly educated people will stay away from this.

[astro3]

Germar Rudolf is an absolute saint and Hero of our modern times. Who else has done as much as he has? One thing has driven him all his life and that is the love of Truth.
For our enemies, Truth is Hate.
I remember him saying to me once, ‘Even on Mars they’d come and get you.’
In a way, that whole UN resolution of January 2022 – which has mandated all nations on earth to clamp down on revisionist history – (news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1110202) was caused by what he and his publishing company had achieved.
(only Iran voted against it)
Note “The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws that regulate an establishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.”
Santomauro published this CODOH statement on 15 December.

[DissentingOpinions]

Lamprecht, I don't think you fully grasp the scope how much interest Holocaust & National Socialist revisionism can garner among younger people. The people posting memes are from 4Chan's /pol/ & History boards, many of which have been influenced by the popular cartoon "Murdoch Murdoch", whose finale movie tackled the Holocaust myth(In the style of the main characters fighting it in an all out quest). In what was supposed to be their last AMA, I promoted the Holocaust Handbooks series & it got many likes as a Bitchute comment, with one reply being grateful for the material. I'm 100% positive that if we continue to share the high quality revisionist research, there will be more people interested.

[Hektor]

Germar Rudolf is an absolute saint and Hero of our modern times. Who else has done as much as he has? One thing has driven him all his life and that is the love of Truth.
For our enemies, Truth is Hate.
I remember him saying to me once, ‘Even on Mars they’d come and get you.’
In a way, that whole UN resolution of January 2022 – which has mandated all nations on earth to clamp down on revisionist history – (news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1110202) was caused by what he and his publishing company had achieved.
(only Iran voted against it)
Note “The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws that regulate an establishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.”
Santomauro published this CODOH statement on 15 December.

Since a while ago, I somehow don't think that the US-government / political establishment in the US doesn't really care that much about what the Constitution allows them or prevents them to do. They found ways to deal with dissent using police and courts, while allowing riots, when it suits them. They will find a way to suppress "Holocaust Denial" as well. Now they can target people that have a profile with police and courts. Controlling what people say in private conversations is far more difficult. Their suppression of freedoms of people is a plausible example on why we one doesn't easily get grade A publications disputing the Holocaust. Or why academics seem to 'have consensus' on the matter. What they are doing to force the Holocaust through, can actually become its downfall.

What's happening right now should however be of a bigger concern than whatever happened or didn't happen during WW2. The two subjects are however related.

[Percy]

Let's look at another revisionist loss: Carlo Mattogno is retiring from revisionism. Holocaust Handbooks Volume 50 "The Neuengamme and Sachsenhausen Gas Chambers—With a Focus on British Investigations for the Tesch Trial", was a surprise release this year. The Real Auschwitz Chronicle is expected to be released next year in September. Mattogno doesn't have any other new volumes in the works, so this could be it.

Carlo Mattogno is NOT retiring from revisionism. His "retiring" is a fake news. Mattogno continues to work and write, as ever (at least in italian, since Germar Rudolf is currently unable to publish new books in english).

[DissentingOpinions]

Let's look at another revisionist loss: Carlo Mattogno is retiring from revisionism. Holocaust Handbooks Volume 50 "The Neuengamme and Sachsenhausen Gas Chambers—With a Focus on British Investigations for the Tesch Trial", was a surprise release this year. The Real Auschwitz Chronicle is expected to be released next year in September. Mattogno doesn't have any other new volumes in the works, so this could be it.

Carlo Mattogno is NOT retiring from revisionism. His "retiring" is a fake news. Mattogno continues to work and write, as ever (at least in italian, since Germar Rudolf is currently unable to publish new books in english).

It's an inference based on information from CODOH. The donation page currently lists Mattogno's only upcoming Holocaust Handbooks volume as "The Real Auschwitz Chronicle", which is currently in the thickening process - because there are no other research endeavors, logic tells me that this is the end.

[fireofice]

It's an inference based on information from CODOH. The donation page currently lists Mattogno's only upcoming Holocaust Handbooks volume as "The Real Auschwitz Chronicle", which is currently in the thickening process - because there are no other research endeavors, logic tells me that this is the end.

That doesn't really mean much. I've seen periods of time where there were no books claiming to be coming out, and then Mattogno put out more books by surprise. His Auschwitz Chronicle hasn't even come out yet. You expect him to advertise literally every book he will ever do before it comes out? That is quite silly. You are not basing his supposed "retirement" on anything credible.