Eric Hunt rolls over?

[Carto's Cutlass Supreme]

I don't want to get off-topic, but I remember I looked into Oberhauser's death and it was shortly after Lanzmann discovered him at his job, if I remember, which makes it that much more suspicious.

[Hannover]

I just tried to find out details about Oberhausers death in 1979 but there seems to be no information at all... Kind of suspicious isn't it.

Oh yes, Oberhauser.

A man allegedly involved in 'hundreds of murders' passed away a free man after serving a couple of years after saving his ass by playing along in a Show Trial.

Why say anything at all?

CODOH main site search results: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relev ... oberhauser

See more, search oberhauser at this forum.

- H.

[Revisionist]

I don't want to get off-topic, but I remember I looked into Oberhauser's death and it was shortly after Lanzmann discovered him at his job, if I remember, which makes it that much more suspicious.

Really?

I remember Thomas Kues saying that many people directly involved in the final solution died conveniently.

[Hektor]

I don't want to get off-topic, but I remember I looked into Oberhauser's death and it was shortly after Lanzmann discovered him at his job, if I remember, which makes it that much more suspicious.

Josef Oberhauser was born in 1915 and died in 1979 according to Wiki. That would make him 64 at the time of his death. This isn't exceptionally old, but it's certainly within the range where people die a natural death.

Could it be that someone "helped" there a bit, since it seemed that Oberhauser may start talking in a different direction? Possible, but that would certainly require more proof.

Claude Lanzmann's Shoah may seem like a convenient propaganda peace, but overall I think he may have shot the narrative in the foot.
He got several types of "witnesses" there. From naive people that tell circumstantial stories towards obviously pathological liars.
Rudolf Vrba, Filip Mueller, Jan Karski, Franz Suchomel were obviously liars. One can actually pick that up, when they're speaking, there is something in their voice that gives that away. With that presumption in mind, one needs to ask why one needs false witnesses to describe a supposedly true event? The same applies to dishonest communication regarding the suggestion that "Holocaust deniers" dispute all aspects of the narrative. I mean deportation and mortality in the camp are disputed by virtually nobody.

[Hannover]

I don't want to get off-topic, but I remember I looked into Oberhauser's death and it was shortly after Lanzmann discovered him at his job, if I remember, which makes it that much more suspicious.

Really?

I remember Thomas Kues saying that many people directly involved in the final solution died conveniently.

Indeed, see this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5226&p=33872
A Brief List of the Conveniently Deceased
by Thomas Kues
https://codoh.com/library/document/656/?lang=en

- Hannover

If you start with false premises, everything you subsequently extrapolate from those premises will likewise carry along the original error and thus exhibit error within themselves; aka: garbage in, garbage out.

[borjastick]

And who would hear these death bed confessions and how would that information get out??

[Breker]

And who says they languished in a "death bed" at all before passing on?

But then:

Acccording the Simon Wiesenthal, Franz Ziereis (the former commandant of Mauthausen/Hartheim) made a death bed "confession" which claimed:

- 4,000,000 were gassed to death with carbon monoxide at the nearby Hartheim satellite in the Mauthausen complex

- the Germans killed another 10,000,000 people in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia

source: 'KZ Mauthausen', Simon Wiesenthal, 1946

B.

[Elroy]

And who would hear these death bed confessions and how would that information get out??

Presumably by writing a letter to that effect whilst still relatively healthy and orchestrated to be revealed posthumously- either be giving it to a relative or putting it into a safe box for delivery once expired etc etc.

It would not be that hard. Of course the far more difficult part would be getting that information OUT by whomever came into possession of it.

Because of the law and censorship we wouldn't know about it. and no relative would know anything about revisionism most likely because of the spell.

But I felt that even though he's wrong Eric made this single relevant point during his 4 hour interview with Berg- who was far too emotional (angry) to deal with Eric's slime at times.

I'm curious if there are any former SS revelations to this effect which would be good in combatting this bacilli

[Elroy]

Thank you for the links above guys RE: the convenient deaths of any SS etc allegedly involved- that would actually go a long way itself to explain things here wouldn't it.

[Atigun]

Does anyone have a link to Hunt's actual mea culpa? His long-winded explanation for why he recanted? I would appreciate it. I've read it but didn't save the site address and a new search has led to just about everything except his statement. The links given at the start of this thread go nowhere. Need a little help.

[Lamprecht]

Does anyone have a link to Hunt's actual mea culpa? His long-winded explanation for why he recanted? I would appreciate it. I've read it but didn't save the site address and a new search has led to just about everything except his statement. The links given at the start of this thread go nowhere. Need a little help.

This does not work for you?

https://archive.fo/DoGTn

[Atigun]

Ah, thank you for the link. It seems to work just fine and I truly appreciate that, Lamprecht. Again, my apologies for my less than sterling computer skills.

[billy_batts]

Did Eric Hunt move to Russia around his time of "sudden change of belief"?

In that case i think its easy to see why he would have to do this. Holocaust denial is a extremely serious offense in Russia and he would probably not only go to prison but he would for sure not be allowed to stay in Russia.

[Pia Kahn]

Eric Hunt posted a justification for his conversion to holocaust orthodoxy. His reasoning was based - how ironic - on Auschwitz and in particular on the infamous pictures supposedly taken close to Crema 5. These photographs, pictures of distorted corpses close to crema 5, are very well known among revisionists. They do show corpses, but they show signs of manipulationd and they do not show the cause of death. Thus, I was suspicious about his change of mind. This was nothing new. I discussed the arguments with Eric on the web page he had posted for the occasion. There were a couple of feeble attempts to respond to me.... but pretty soon his voice fell silent. I didn't press him any more.

I think Eric Hunt was frustrated with Germar Rudolf. He felt that he was not receiving the respect for his work that he deserved . At the same time he had to endure incessant pressure and slander from the side the orthodoxy - possibly even blackmkail. He could no longer endure his situation from a psychological point of few. His will was broken, he wanted to have a normal life.

We should let him go and thank him for the work he has done in the past.