Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Otium
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:16 pm

Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Otium » 5 months 1 hour ago (Sun Jan 08, 2023 11:31 pm)

I wanted to link here Germar's responses to Richard Green simply for the sake of easy references.

Germar has responded, and/or commented on Richard Green in the following books and articles:

In the updated 2019 edition of the edited volume 'Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory.”' Germar's chapter entitled: 'The Technique and Chemistry of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz', pgs. 331-365.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

In the updated 2020 edition of Germar's book 'The Chemistry of Auschwitz' in Chapter 8, subchapter 8.4.4. pgs. 347-353.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

In the updated 2017 edition of the book 'Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies and Prejudices on the Holocaust', Germar's chapter entitled: 'Green sees Red', pgs, 71-88.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

August 9, 1998 - 'Some considerations about the ›Gas Chambers‹ of Auschwitz and Birkenau'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

August 30, 1999 - 'Character Assasinations'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

October 8, 2003 - 'Dr. Richard Green's Evasions'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

See too this relevant article from 2013 published by the Inconvenient History Journal by Germar Rudolf and Nicholas Kollerstrom, entitled: 'Differential Exposure of Brickwork to Hydrogen Cyanide during World War Two'
Link 1 | Link 2 - Archive 1 - 1 | Archive 1 - 2 | Archive 2 - 1 | Archive 2 - 2


Germar may have also referred to Green on his website previously at: http://germarrudolf.com/, so if I'm forgetting anything please let me know.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Hektor » 4 months 4 weeks ago (Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:22 am)

Richard Green essentially tries to make lots of words to cover up that they don't have anything worth showing in terms of forensic evidence supporting the extermination thesis. The issue is that he isn't open for arguments at all. Green sticks to the Holocaust claims and cites 'testimony'.... The testimony has problems and isn't backed up at all by forensic evidence. If he can't acknowledge that clearly, he got a problem and isn't interested in the truth at all.

Fred zz
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:37 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Fred zz » 4 months 4 weeks ago (Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:01 pm)

from whom does this "They washed the room after each gassing" come from?
History is never a one-sided story.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Lamprecht » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jan 12, 2023 10:30 pm)

Fred zz wrote:from whom does this "They washed the room after each gassing" come from?

Here's a thread on the subject;

Those Prussian Blues Just Won't Wash
viewtopic.php?t=4600
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3233
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby borjastick » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jan 13, 2023 2:54 am)

Yeah, those pesky practicalities and evidence or lack thereof keep getting in the way. Ooops!

Sending millions of jews all the way across europe just to kill them. Ooops.

Cremating all those dead jews inside 15 minutes. Ooops.

Loading the single hand-drawn elevator against the clock to be able to cremate all those jews inside 15 minutes. Ooops.

Having to keep those poor jews waiting outside in the cold while the gas chamber is washed and painted every single time. Ooops.

Shooting and burying them there jews in mass graves right across eastern europe and then forgetting where they are. Ooops.

Not having any trace of all those dead jews, not even millions of their teeth, after having got rid of them at Auschwitz. Ooops.

I could go on but I'm expecting a DHL delivery and life goes on. Ooops.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Hektor » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:44 am)

borjastick wrote:Yeah, those pesky practicalities and evidence or lack thereof keep getting in the way. Ooops!

Sending millions of jews all the way across europe just to kill them. Ooops.

Cremating all those dead jews inside 15 minutes. Ooops.

Loading the single hand-drawn elevator against the clock to be able to cremate all those jews inside 15 minutes. Ooops.

Having to keep those poor jews waiting outside in the cold while the gas chamber is washed and painted every single time. Ooops.

Shooting and burying them there jews in mass graves right across eastern europe and then forgetting where they are. Ooops.

Not having any trace of all those dead jews, not even millions of their teeth, after having got rid of them at Auschwitz. Ooops.

I could go on but I'm expecting a DHL delivery and life goes on. Ooops.


The narrative is riddled with obnoxious claims. Still people are forced to believe it.

Germar Rudolf tried to test, whether key claims being made can be verified... He demonstrated they couldn't.
But Green insists that we still must believe them. Because he and his buddies say so.
He actually doesn't claim that it is physically proven, just tries to find excuses why it couldn't.

It's mostly about prussian blue and why that not forming doesn't demonstrate that the place wasn't used as alleged. Green ignores the other problems with the narrative, but I guess he simply will claim that 'he isn't an expert on this'. How is now 'expert enough' to assert the Holocaust claims is beyond me.

Fred zz
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:37 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Fred zz » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jan 13, 2023 9:53 am)

Lamprecht wrote:
Fred zz wrote:from whom does this "They washed the room after each gassing" come from?

Here's a thread on the subject;

Those Prussian Blues Just Won't Wash
viewtopic.php?t=4600


Thanks for the response.
I have some basic and/or simplistic thoughts on this issue but do hear me out.
For the moment let's consider the room is full of naked people standing shoulder to shoulder and the Zyklon comes down, and now there is a big panic inside the room. .
Now think in terms of how the human body releaves him or herself by peeing or pooing.
I will assume we all understand human anatomy. If one is standing in a crowded gas chamber and discharges out of panic and/or fear, the orifices that human waste discharges from both are pointed downward, Yes, the floor would have to be cleaned, and perhaps the wall no more than 3 feet (915mm) would be cleaned up, However from the cleaning crew's standpoint, mid wall height and especially upper wall height and ceiling would not require cleaning and be skipped because there is nothing to clean. No human has the muscle to pee to the upper wall or ceiling, and I would add no one would be thinking of their pee pee while being gassed and panicked, so we can assume it would be pointed downward.

The only blood discharge I can think of is someone getting hit in the nose in a panic. People have been hit by cars and do not bleed externally. Internally perhaps. Regardless in all 3 cases, gravity is not working in favor of the people who believe this nonsense.
I attached a photo to give reference of how high the ceiling is. Note the height of the man with red top. I give no pee stains higher than his waist.
am I missing anything here?
Attachments
aus gas chamber with people.JPG
History is never a one-sided story.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3233
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby borjastick » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jan 13, 2023 11:56 am)

Now think in terms of how the human body releaves him or herself by peeing or pooing.


am I missing anything here?


Yes you are. You are buying into the claim and assumption that some/many/all people inside a gas chamber (that has never been shown to exist or operate btw) will defecate themselves during the process of falling to the ground while falling asleep or however ZyklonB would afflict people. The claim of walls covered in poo assumes also that everyone was close to the wall and could projectile poo at some speed.

It also assumes the gas chambers were real, in operation and did their job.

I assume none of this happened.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Fred zz
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:37 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Fred zz » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Jan 13, 2023 12:54 pm)

I am not selling the gas chamber theory. I am stating merely stating what would happen if the room was full of people in a big panic.
Never said anything about poo on the wall. I clearly stated gravity is not working in the favor who believe in the hoax as things fall downward
History is never a one-sided story.

User avatar
Horhug
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:01 am

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Horhug » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:02 am)

Otium wrote:I wanted to link here Germar's responses to Richard Green simply for the sake of easy references.

Germar has responded, and/or commented on Richard Green in the following books and articles:

In the updated 2019 edition of the edited volume 'Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory.”' Germar's chapter entitled: 'The Technique and Chemistry of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz', pgs. 331-365.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

In the updated 2020 edition of Germar's book 'The Chemistry of Auschwitz' in Chapter 8, subchapter 8.4.4. pgs. 347-353.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

In the updated 2017 edition of the book 'Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies and Prejudices on the Holocaust', Germar's chapter entitled: 'Green sees Red', pgs, 71-88.
Link | Archive - PDF | Archive

August 9, 1998 - 'Some considerations about the ›Gas Chambers‹ of Auschwitz and Birkenau'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

August 30, 1999 - 'Character Assasinations'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

October 8, 2003 - 'Dr. Richard Green's Evasions'
Link | Archive 1 | Archive 2

See too this relevant article from 2013 published by the Inconvenient History Journal by Germar Rudolf and Nicholas Kollerstrom, entitled: 'Differential Exposure of Brickwork to Hydrogen Cyanide during World War Two'
Link 1 | Link 2 - Archive 1 - 1 | Archive 1 - 2 | Archive 2 - 1 | Archive 2 - 2


Germar may have also referred to Green on his website previously at: http://germarrudolf.com/, so if I'm forgetting anything please let me know.



See also :

Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 18:
Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno: Auschwitz Lies—Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust
4th, revised and expanded edition of 2017.
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=18



.

Otium

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Otium » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:52 am)

Horhug wrote:See also :

Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 18:
Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno: Auschwitz Lies—Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust
4th, revised and expanded edition of 2017.
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=18


You will see I have already linked that.

User avatar
Otium
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Otium » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sat Jan 14, 2023 4:38 pm)

So you did. Sorry I missed it.

Are you aware of :

- Germar's articles on Green's responses at GR's VHO site?

- Pages at the old Nikzor site?

- Green's articles at holocaust-history.org?

Otium

Re: Germar Rudolf's Responses to Richard Green

Postby Otium » 4 months 3 weeks ago (Sun Jan 15, 2023 10:34 pm)

Horhug wrote:So you did. Sorry I missed it.

Are you aware of :

- Germar's articles on Green's responses at GR's VHO site?

- Pages at the old Nikzor site?

- Green's articles at holocaust-history.org?


I have linked the VHO articles.

The point wasn't to bother linking any of the Nizkor/Green articles. The point was to collect Germar's responses.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests