Bo wrote:Death sentence to a SS in peacetime, indicates that the SS had dangerous knowledge.
Executions of Nazi intelligentsia after 8 may 1945 was said to be motivated by revenge.
A contributing motivation could be, that the person knew, what could disturb the history writing of the victors.
Revenge could be life imprisonment, as in the case of Hess. Hess was kept in a high security prison and never allowed to be interviewed by the medias or researchers.
If the allied powers were seriously interested in reaching historical truth and understanding, they ought to find it useful to keep a SS-witness with knowledge and insight alive, until he died of old age.
A witness kept alive, could be used for in-depth analysis on the nature of the evil of Nazism and the details of how holocaust was administered.
He would have been a Gods Gift to the historical science, both for high level university research and as guest in TV talk shows, popularising the new understanding of the events,
But the statements that SS Adolf Eichmann had uttered while pumped full of psychopharma in his Jerusalem prison, were so sometimes so unrealistic, that it was of importance to have the "hard disc of his brain erased" by hanging, as quickly as possible, to avoid damage to the holocaust myth.
Imagine if other investigators had cross-examined Adolf Eichmann at an appeal case!
The house of cards could give fallen flat.
Easily the weak points and the utterly unrealistic fiction put in the mouth of Eichmann might have been proven wrong.
It would have been a disaster. Revisionism predictably became strong and is getting stronger and stronger, day-by-day, and the holocaust industry is fighting a tough game of invention to avoid loosing face.
The lie of 6 mio Jews killed in kz was to fall, after the 4 mio of Auschwitz were proven wrong and the engraved text on the monuments at the kz memorial were changed to 1-1½ mio.
Therefore it was needed to write Goldhagen "Hitler willing executioners" , which admits that Einsatz-gruppen murders must be added to the kz deaths to reach the established number of 6 mio.
When you are loosing a game of chess, you push the board to fall to the floor and the unhappy positions cannot be re-established. Same with hanging Eichmann - a dead witness is a good witness.
Same with many other key witnesses of the Nuremberg Trial and later Polish holocaust trials - especially the (probably tortured) Auschwitz commander Hoess, who was ordered to put his Nuremberg evidence - and then some - into an unrealistic book,
He wrote the lies, that he was instructed about and was then hanged in Poland (one of the Krakow processes).
The leaders of the "holocaust industry" are not keen on an eye for eye revenge. No vindictive masses of voters were ever demanding executions as punishment against the losers of the war. Thus it served no purpose to hang Eichmann, Hoess and dozens of other so-called kz-sadists.
Thus the keen use of death sentence can only be explained as dictated by the need to eliminate manipulated witness, which might otherwise become inconvenient in the future.
I find it "head on the nail". Comments are invited.
