Lamprecht wrote:During the plague, Jews were often accused of "poisoning the well" to make gentiles sick. Jews refer to this allegation as a canard or trope, much like the "blood libel" (ritual murder) accusations that in some cases have recently been shown to true. Although it would pretty much be impossible to 100% confirm a well poisoning accusation against Jews from the middle ages, we have a much more recent example of Jews doing this in occupied Palestine against the gentile inhabitants. The well-poisoning was done only a few years after WWII ended and they began their mass exodus to the region.
...
By their own standards (they apply tot the Holocaust), they are guilty.
But Revisionists have higher standards, of course.
'Poisoning the Well' can mean various things. Physically it is putting poison into something were people and animals get water.
But it is also a logical fallacy:
Poisoning the Well
(also known as: discrediting, smear tactics, appeal to ethos [form of])
Description: To commit a preemptive ad hominem (abusive) attack against an opponent. That is, to prime the audience with adverse information about the opponent from the start, in an attempt to make your claim more acceptable or discount the credibility of your opponent’s claim.
Now that sounds familiar.