stinky wrote:Perhaps NFrNJ could post some better photos.
A better photo.
A photo.
Further, I don't want to misrepresent our guest here, though it seems fairly straight forward, but is NFrNJ actually dismissively referring to the following logic as a tactic - making the observation that a picture showing few human remains is not evidence of mass murder on a large scale?
If I am following NFrNJ correctly, presumably one should conclude that a photo showing few human remains, is in fact evidence of mass murder on a large scale?
Believers gotta do what believers gotta do.
You will often encounter this strategy. The claim is that the burnt remains of hundreds of thousands are buried at specific camps. There are supposed to be trenches the size of olympic swimming pools filled to the brim with burnt human remains. Allegedly they are in precisely known locations.
If, after an "archaeological investigation" we are only shown a handful of scattered pits with 5-20 people in each, that is strong evidence against the official narrative. Desperate shills will call this point "moving the goalposts" but it isn't, as it would always be expected that some people would have perished in transit from disease or would have been executed for attempting escape.
Sometimes, the desperate true believers will post old Soviet photographs of piles of skulls from Majdanek, which revisionists have estimated had a death toll of around 40-45 thousand. Majdanek had an extraordinarily high death rate compared to other camps because for a long time it had inadequate sanitation facilities. Of course, in the final months there was a huge spike in deaths at all of the remaining camps, which we know was because of overcrowding + lack of food, water, and medicine. Still, we will be shown photographs of disease victims at Bergen-Belsen and that is supposed to convince us that the "extermination camp" conspiracy theory for the AR camps is true.
I think myself, and others here are coming at things very differently than our guest
He has not even attempted to provide evidence to support his conspiracy theory. Maybe he has contacted Mitchell and is waiting on a response:
Another Treblinka "Archaeologist"? William Mitchell claims to have "vital evidence to prove the deniers wrong"
viewtopic.php?t=13050
I tried that multiple times and never got any "vital evidence." If he has it, he's hiding it.
