Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Tommo
Member
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:45 pm

Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Tommo » 6 years 1 week ago (Thu Jun 01, 2017 2:39 am)

I once read somewhere that the first known report of "extermination" allegedly by gas chambers (?) came from 2 escapees whom reported it to allied intelligence. Their subsequent escape stories proved to be outrageously fraudulent lending credence to the gassing rumour being an implanted psyop from the beginning.

Do we actually know the first instance of report?

Do we know whether the gassing rumour was implanted by Soviet psyche war? Or British or American? Or underground Poles?

Or was it the Zionists who first seeded the minds of the inmates to think the delousing process was a killing operation?

Or was it a mistaken belief concocted by the inmates themselves and then simply built up by these powers^^?

We may not know, but any light on that subject could assist with portraying the "crime of the 20th century" which is not the Holocaust, but the Holocaust MYTH- from start to finish...
What are you angry about? By proving the gas chambers a lie, I just knocked off half the holocaust and SAVED 3 million Jew's for you!

I just saved more Jew's than Oskar Schindler allegedly ever did! :lol:

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Hannover » 6 years 1 week ago (Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:22 pm)

You must have missed this:

''Britain’s Rumor Factory / Origins of the Gas Chamber Story''
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11171

and of course this:

'Why have supremacist Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869?'

Image

- Hannover

Look for the US Zionists to pass anti free speech laws which will ban scrutiny of, and free speech on the impossible 'holocaust' storyline, as has been done in much of 'democratic' Europe.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Hegwood
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Hegwood » 6 years 1 week ago (Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:58 pm)

Tommo,

Are you thinking of Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler and their "Auschwitz Report"?

Hegwood

flimflam
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby flimflam » 6 years 1 week ago (Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:36 pm)

You can find out a lot about the Vrba report, its origin, how it came to be published by the WRB, here in this great vid by Irving ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S7BrcH-6Yw

And, it seems silly to suggest that the Brits dreamed up the gas chamber hoax, or any part of the hoax. The Jews created the the hoax in the early part of the 20th century and have continued to elaborate on it even up till the present day.

Hoax or myth? When someone tries to cash a three dollar bill it's a hoax, not a myth. And the Jews are cashing in on the holohoax every day.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Moderator » 6 years 1 week ago (Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:00 pm)

There's lot at this forum on the WRB report, just search Vrba Wetzler.
M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby hermod » 6 years 1 week ago (Fri Jun 02, 2017 12:42 am)

flimflam wrote:And, it seems silly to suggest that the Brits dreamed up the gas chamber hoax, or any part of the hoax. The Jews created the the hoax in the early part of the 20th century and have continued to elaborate on it even up till the present day.


In the early part of the 20th century (and even in the late part of the 19th century), the Jews created the hoax of a martyrdom of 6 million Jews, not the hoax of a mass murder of 6 million Jews, which was supposed to justify the grabbing of Palestine for themselves. And the hoax of gas chambers for the mass slaughter of civilians was in fact a British finding. During WW1. For the purpose of demonizing of the "Huns"' allies in Serbia. By combining the widespread fear of chemical warfare at that time and the very many deaths due to the typhus epidemics raging in that area.
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

User avatar
Hieldner
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 226
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:21 am

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Hieldner » 6 years 6 days ago (Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:57 am)

This post was useless, sorry. Just read Britain’s Rumor Factory.
To provide soap for Germany … [Prof. Spanner] used, in the mode of the Shakespearean witches, racially and ethnically diverse corpses in his experiments … This defies the popular perception that the soap was made of “pure Jewish fat.” … We may consider this misperception a curious symptom of a purist and essentialist reading, or, at least, note that the tension between essentialism and utilitarianism reaches its peak in this misreading.

– Bożena Shallcross

User avatar
Zulu
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 9:44 am

Re: Origin / First instance of the H-myth

Postby Zulu » 6 years 6 days ago (Fri Jun 02, 2017 12:15 pm)

Moderator wrote:There's lot at this forum on the WRB report, just search Vrba Wetzler.
M1

I mentioned a good study of the "Auschwitz Protocols"
at viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9920&p=75150&hilit=protocolos#p75150
See
LOS "PROTOCOLOS DE AUSCHWITZ": ¿UNA FUENTE HISTORICA? by Enrique Aynat,Published on internet by AAARGH, 2002.
(The protocols of Auschwitz: A historical Source?)
https://archive.org/details/Losprotocol ... eHistorica

I repeat hereafter the last lines of the translation of its conclusion on p.6:
---Consequently, if, as seen, Auschwitz was not an airtight place, as there were information channels that linked the country to the outside, and if Slovak Jewish organizations maintained contacts, legal or clandestine, with Poland, it is more than likely that these organizations received information from inside Auschwitz, where also have had arrived thousands of Jews deported from Slovakia. My thesis sustains precisely that this communication existed and that someone from one of these Slovak Jewish organizations "fabricated" Auschwitz Protocols by taking as basis fragmentary information received from inside the camp.
---In short, the Protocols of Auschwitz do not withstand criticism. They are apocryphal and contain a lot of false information. Necessarily it must be concluded that its value as a historical source is null.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests