How accurate is the Holocaust Controversies Blog?

[Iris]

clewder said

"an interesting blog I came across has challenged my view on the subject."

In what way chewder?

What was your view on the subject prior to coming across that blog?

[Iris]

I would like to ask people here if there is any truth to what the blog Holocaust Controversies preaches? They seem to use good sources, so I want to see your thoughts!

chewder, I would like to share my thoughts with you, but not if this is one of those one and done hit and run posts that so often gets posted here by the likes of those sophomoric HC members.

Respond to some of the thoughts that have already been posted here, or I am done with this game.

[Iris]

hermod

Is Muehlenkamp perhaps a masochist? Does he relish the role of the circus clown who is pelted with eggs to the roaring laughter of the audience?

I'll leave this thread to die on this note, as everyone reading this knows that the answer to hermod's question is yes.

[Hektor]

hermod

Is Muehlenkamp perhaps a masochist? Does he relish the role of the circus clown who is pelted with eggs to the roaring laughter of the audience?

I'll leave this thread to die on this note, as everyone reading this knows that the answer to hermod's question is yes.

While I won't dispute the appearances, I will refrain from psychoanalyzing this guy from a save distance. But from what I heard white-knighting Holocaustians aren't exactly a pleasant bunch to have around. Covertly aggressive personalities. While they are united under their supposedly noble cause, they are aggressive toward each other. It's of course part of the humane condition, but it seems they are a bit worse than average in this regard. Sure, those folks are clearly emotionally invested in the narrative. But the question is how accurate the blog actually is. The material they use will be tidbits from the literature and other stuff already floating around. They don't seem to be caring that much about authenticity as long as it can be bend to serve the point they try to make. But does it even make this point. That there were deportations, concentration camps, mortality in those camps isn't really in dispute. The real question is what the actual evidence for an extermination program involving homicidal gas chambers is. On closer look it isn't exactly overwhelming. So they got to grasp for straws in the form of circumstantial evidence, which doesn't contradict their favored thesis, but isn't really proof neither. The proof perfectly fits what isn't in dispute, too. And that is that the Axis/NS-Germany did try to physically remove Jews from European societies. That's also the starting point of Exterminationism, they just add a lot of atrocity stories to it. It's an attempt to legitimize Allied atrocity propaganda against Germany. Something that actually escalated the brutality of the war and grew death tolls exponentially. In a sense it is a way of compensating for Allied guilt. One looks whiter, if you can manage to paint the enemy darker. Of course the various stakeholders in pushing Holocaust Myth do also have various motives, but it is their Antigermanism that actually unites them. In extent this pathological hate is of course not limited to Germans but by association includes all Westerners, Christians, White people, Nationalists, opponents of Communism and Globalitarianism.

[hermod]

hermod

Is Muehlenkamp perhaps a masochist? Does he relish the role of the circus clown who is pelted with eggs to the roaring laughter of the audience?

I'll leave this thread to die on this note, as everyone reading this knows that the answer to hermod's question is yes.

Jürgen Graf's question. That was a quote from his epilogue of the book he wrote on that topic with Mattogno and Kues.

[Pia Kahn]

The HC Bloggers haven't posted anything for the last six months, which is very unusual for their site. They've been posting at least one post each month for years. Have they finally given up?