In an era of doublespeak we have a refreshing, straight forward approach which strips matters to the basics... by French scholar, Dr. Robert Faurisson.
- H.
World War III Revisionism
If ever Americans and British do not find evidence of Saddam's
"Weapons of Mass Destruction" or of Saddam's (six ?) doubles (in
French : sosies), this will be the best possible evidence that those
WMDs and those doubles really existed.
Remember the witchcraft trials, the Nazi war criminals trials or the
Revisionists trials.
In the past centuries (especially from 1450 to 1650), according to
some experts, there were allegedly sixty possible traces on the body
of a witch that she had intercourse with Satan but, finally, it seems
it was decided, in spite of descriptions made by those naive experts,
that the best possible evidence of such an intercourse was that Satan
had erased every trace; otherwise he would not have been Satan.
In the last century (especially from 1945), the same thing happened
with the Nazi gas chambers and with the witnesses of the gassings of
the Jews. There was allegedly a lot of evidence and testimonies but,
finally, it seems it was decided, in spite of demonstrations made by
naive experts, that the best possible evidence was that Hitler had
ordered the destruction of all those chemical slaughterhouses and the
killing of all the witnesses; otherwise he would not have been
Hitler.
As Simone Veil already put it in 1983 : "Everyone knows that
the Nazis destroyed those gas chambers and systematically eliminated
the witnesses" (France-Soir Magazine, 7 May 1983, p.47).
At the beginning of this very century (especially from 2002), it
seems we'll have the same scenario with Saddam's WMDs, and his
doubles.
If that is the case, the lies (and the liars ?) should be the same,
and Revisionism of WW 3 practiced by Revisionists of WW 2 should be
an easy job.
Robert Faurisson
