Postby grapple » 2 decades 2 months ago (Sat Mar 29, 2003 3:30 pm)
The Holocaust promoters already have enough trouble with the eyewitness testimony they have now. The Holocaust Promoters are forced to selectively quote from the eyewitnesses in order to get some story that makes some sort of sense. The Official Holocaust story already contradicts major portions of eyewitness testimony that already is published, such as Steam Chambers, Human Soap, Human Skin Lampshades, etc. If even more eyewitness testimony were allowed to be widely published, it would be even harder to keep people from realizing the huge scale of the lies on which the Holocaust is built.
How would more wild eyewitness's stories about Hitler personally gassing people in the camps or more stories of physically impossible execution methods help the Holocaust Promoters. They already have too many of these kind of stories already, they do not need any more. If people start questioning stories that are obviously wrong, they may not believe any of the stories. Then who will then want to pay for a bunch of badly written fictional horror stories? Some people may even want their money back.
No, it is much better for the Holocaust Promoters to keep these stories under lock and key. This way they get to make money from donations for the project and at the same time give their Holocaust Scholars the ability to be able to selectively quote from a small selection of eyewitness testimony that backs up today's Holocaust story.
