ABC staffers want Whoopi Goldberg FIRED for Holocaust comments

[Bonesy]

I can't imagine Whoopi was trying to be controversial in what she said given she is on MSM and in no way sympathetic with our views, but it shows that any Holocaust™ references are reserved exclusively for a select few.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/us/exc-a ... li=AAgfLCP

ABC News staffers are furious at the network for not firing Whoopi Goldberg after she claimed that "the Holocaust™ wasn't about race"

She referred to Jews and Nazis as 'two groups of white people' and said that because they were both white

Rookie mistake there, Whoopi. Could that have infuriated them more than the Holocaust comment?

it was about 'inhumanity' and not race'.

So what do the ADL (et al) think it was about? Could it have been something to do with the behaviour that has troubled the Jewish people for centuries? Can't have people asking too many questions now, can we?

[borjastick]

Was she really making a BLM point here? Maybe she meant they were two groups of white people because they were not black like her. She needs to understand that jews are only white when it suits them all the other times they are God's children, a race apart, the chosenites who have been singled out for brutality and death by the Goys on this planet for no good reason whatsoever.

Every. Single. Time.

[Hektor]

Was she really making a BLM point here? Maybe she meant they were two groups of white people because they were not black like her. She needs to understand that jews are only white when it suits them all the other times they are God's children, a race apart, the chosenites who have been singled out for brutality and death by the Goys on this planet for no good reason whatsoever.

Every. Single. Time.

One can not blame Whoopie Goldberg for seeing it that way. American Jews generally look pretty White and it is a valid conclusion from this that those are two White groups in conflict with each other.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMY8BwwKJDY


Ironically, she just repeats what Jews said previously that their "Holocaust Education" is about making people tolerant to each other. Seems this is all about when, what argument serves whom.

Is there still anyone doubting that this is a cult (one without clear boundaries by that)?

[hermod]

The proponents of the Zionist-Globalist scheme (aka the New World Order) politically need a fable on closed borders for Israel and open borders for everybody else (that's what the Holohoax is), not a pseudo-philosophical lesson on "man's inhumanity to man". Hence the rebuke.

[Hektor]

The proponents of the Zionist-Globalist scheme (aka the New World Order) politically need a fable on closed borders for Israel and open borders for everybody else (that's what the Holohoax is), not a pseudo-philosophical lesson on "man's inhumanity to man". Hence the rebuke.

But that was the sales pitch for their grift. Their own contest of playing the victim was blatantly self-serving and this would be noticed by their target groups. So they would have to come up with another swindle to cover the previous ones that this was about "tolerance" and "warning humanity"..... More nonsense of course.... They play the victim for a number of reasons, financial but also rather metaphysical ones. It's their own brand of substitution theology (replacing Christ, with Jews as a group).

[hermod]

One can not blame Whoopie Goldberg for seeing it that way. American Jews generally look pretty White and it is a valid conclusion from this that those are two White groups in conflict with each other.

Nobody (but Jews themselves when that helps their agenda) can call Jews 'Whites' because the Jew-owned mainstream mass media of the West have turned the word 'White' into a synonym for 'oppressor'. 'White' is now a derogatory hate word. So calling Jews 'Whites' is indeed an offensive attack on Jews.

https://postimg.cc/TpvPg4SD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMY8BwwKJDY

Greenblatt is a liar. The Nazis didn't go after the Jews because they regarded Jews as an inferior race. The Nazis went after the Jews because they regarded Jews as a dangerous parasitic people of foreign dominators working for the subversion and destruction of their host countries. Not hard to guess why Greenblatt doesn't want today's Americans to be aware of that fact and perhaps even think about it...

[hermod]

The proponents of the Zionist-Globalist scheme (aka the New World Order) politically need a fable on closed borders for Israel and open borders for everybody else (that's what the Holohoax is), not a pseudo-philosophical lesson on "man's inhumanity to man". Hence the rebuke.

But that was the sales pitch for their grift. Their own contest of playing the victim was blatantly self-serving and this would be noticed by their target groups. So they would have to come up with another swindle to cover the previous ones that this was about "tolerance" and "warning humanity".....

Yes, I know that they first sold their Holohoax as a lesson on "man's inhumanity to man", but that was just trick devised to make us listen to their ludicrous horror tales (just like with Wiesenthal's nonexistent 5 million Gentile victims of the 'Holocaust'). Now, things have changed. The USSR has vanished together with its millions of fictitious Slavic Holocaust victims and the progress of the Zionist-Globalist agenda still requires the constant use of a powerful propaganda weapon of mass deception. So the fable and the 'lesson' have changed too.

[borjastick]

As I have said before on these pages my late father was a British squaddie in Palestine from late 45 or early 46 into the end of 47. I have all his service record so maybe I should check this through and even post some of his black and white pictures from the period here.

He always said the local Palestinian and local jews were almost the same. They looked and dressed very similar and got along perfectly well with each other until... the european jews turned up then all hell broke loose. These were of course the Thirteenth Tribe and not jews at all. They were white and not of middle eastern appearance like the old boys I refer to above. They were and are the Ashkenazi jews though of course with no ancient connection with the tribes of Judah. They were and still are trouble makers. They invented the hugely exaggerated death claims and methods of dying to make their case for stealing Palestine from its rightful and peaceful owners.

[Werd]

So Jews are mad because an African American denied they were a racial group. I guess that depends on which Jew you ask. David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism has an entire chapter on what the Jews say about themselves. Naturally, he quotes Jewish writers who have conflicting views with one another.

[borjastick]

Jews could only be described as a racial group, in my opinion, if they were always living in one region of the world, Mauris, Hutus, Masaai etc, and in their case could prove they were all from the twelve tribes of Judah. They cannot because none of the above applies to the majority ashkenazi jews, aka the Thirteenth Tribe.

If you compared Palestinians and local jews of Palestine they would be so close as to have hardly a fag paper between their make up.

[hermod]

So Jews are mad because an African American denied they were a racial group. I guess that depends on which Jew you ask. David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism has an entire chapter on what the Jews say about themselves. Naturally, he quotes Jewish writers who have conflicting views with one another.

They are mad (or rather pretend to be mad) because they need the Holohoax as a moral lesson on the alleged crucial need for Zionism (a country for the Jews) and on the alleged murderous dangerosity of racism & nationalism (no country for everybody else). No state of Israel and no carte blanche for the destruction of Gentile nations (that is no New World Order) without the 'Holocaust' as a moral compass.