Complete list of Jewish Expulsions / Jews expelled from over 1,000 places in history

[Lamprecht]

Another probable [but minor] error has been located:

1593 A.D. - Brunswick, England - Jews Expelled (P.E. Grosser/E.G. Halperin, ‘Anti-Semitism: Causes and Effects’)

There is only a book snippet on Google. Brunswick is the historical English name for the German/Austrian city of Braunschweig, and it appears that this source is referring to expulsion from Braunschweig, from the page 37 snippet:



https://books.google.com/books?id=932Zw ... swick+1593

Another source:

"CHAPTER XIX.
SETTLEMENT OF JEWS IN HOLLAND.—FEEBLE ATTEMPTS AT ENFRANCHISEMENT.
[...]
652
Refined ecclesiasticism, resulting in the tension which subsequently relieved itself in the general destructiveness of the Thirty Years' War, made the sojourn of Jews, both in Catholic and Protestant countries, a continual torture. Luther's followers in Germany forgot what Luther had so earnestly uttered in their favor, only remembering the hateful things of which, in his bitterness, he had accused them. The Jews of Berlin and the province of Brandenburg, for instance, had the sad alternative put before them of being baptized or expelled. A Jewish financier, the physician Lippold, favorite of Elector Joachim II, and his right hand in his corrupt, financial schemes, examined and tortured on the rack by Joachim's successor, John George, admitted, though afterwards recanting, that he had poisoned his benefactor. The Jews were driven also out of Brunswick by Duke Henry Julius. Catholic nations and princes had no cause to reproach their Protestant opponents with toleration or humanity in regard to Jews."

- History of the Jews, Vol. IV (of VI), by Heinrich Graetz
http://archive.is/FqnOY#selection-8887.822-8887.885 or
http://web.archive.org/web/201510112130 ... 3900-h.htm

Henry Julius was "Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg", and by Brunswick I mean Braunschweig.

So "Brunswick, England" would be incorrect, as it was not in England but present-day Germany.

[Hase]

Clicked link on Stormfront to get here. Magnificent list; excellent work; many have downloaded and will archive. Very best regards!

[Lamprecht]

Another missing from the list: Norway

Between 1687-1851, Jews were banned from Norway in the second paragraph of their constitution, along with Jesuits:

§ 2. The evangelical-Lutheran religion remains the State's public religion. Those inhabitants who profess to it, are obliged to raise their children in the same. Jesuits and monastic orders may not be tolerated. Jews remain excluded from admission to the kingdom.

http://archive.fo/AmMxG

Norway and Denmark were unified at the time, so Danish King Christian V made the order. It was not rescinded until 1851, although in the meantime some exceptions were made.

Norge åpnet portene for jødene først i 1851 / Norway did not open its gates to the Jews until 1851
http://archive.fo/D7qOb

[Archie]

49 A.D. - Rome, Italy - Jews Expelled by Emperor Claudius for “always rioting” (E. Mary Smallwood, ‘The Jews Under Roman Rule: From Pompey To Diocletian’, p. 210)

This one is referenced in the book of Acts in the New Testament.

Acts 18: 2
And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla; (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart from Rome:) and came unto them.

What happened in Germany is really not so different than what has happened so many times in the past, the primary difference being that it occurred in the age of Jewish mass media.

Here is Hitler speaking on January 30, 1939. He explains the rationale for exiling them.

Do not reproach me on the grounds of your humanitarian concerns. The German Volk does not wish to be governed by another people; it does not wish others to determine its affairs in its place. France to the French; England to the English; America to the Americans, and Germany to the Germans! We are determined to undercut the efforts of a certain foreign people to nest here; a people whose members knew how to capture all leading positions. We will banish this people. We are willing to educate our own Volk to assume these leadership functions. We have hundreds of thousands of the most intelligent children of peasants and workers. We will have them educated, and we are already educating them. We are hoping that one day we can place them in all leading positions within the state along with others from our educated classes.

No longer shall these be occupied by members of a people alien to us.

Above all, as the literal meaning of the term already indicates, German culture is exclusively German; it is not Jewish. Hence we shall place the administration and the care for our culture in the hands of our Volk. Should the rest of the world be outraged and protest hypocritically against Germany’s barbarous expulsion of such an extraordinary, culturally valuable, irreplaceable element, then we can only be astonished at the consequences such a stance would imply.

I believe the earlier this problem is resolved, the better. For Europe cannot find peace before it has dealt properly with the Jewish question.

It is possible that the necessity of resolving this problem sooner or later should bring about agreement in Europe, even between nations which otherwise might not have reconciled themselves as readily with one another. There is more than enough room for settlement on this earth. All we need to do is put an end to the prevailing assumption that the Dear Lord chose the Jewish people to be the beneficiaries of a certain percentage of the productive capacities of other peoples’ bodies and their labors. Either the Jews will have to adjust to constructive, respectable activities, such as other people are already engaged in, or, sooner or later, they will succumb to a crisis of yet inconceivable proportions.

These are the same complaints you see in the middle ages and even earlier. The Jews form a specialized caste within a society and tend to dominate it for their own benefit and to the detriment of the general public. They live high on the hog while they are in power (often with the protection of their bought-and-paid-for elite Gentile collaborators), but things tend to shift against them suddenly and they find themselves on the outs.

Each of these events should also be understood as a "holocaust" from the Jewish perspective. Their history is one of perpetual holocausts. Jews of course scoff at the revisionist position that the final solution was "only" deportation. But just think if the United States were to exile Jews en masse and imagine the drama this would entail. "It's anudda shoah!" There is no question in my mind that Jews would react as though they were being exterminated.

[JLAD Prove Me Wrong]

The wrong side won WWII.

Hitler tried to defend Europe from total conquest by the Soviet Union. The communists, many of whom were Jewish, aided by the USA, won WWII. They then formalized and solidified their control under the name of the EU, the European Union. They still rule over the conquered European branch of Western Civilization, and the US still assists them. And every year that goes by they tighten the screws on Europe. They push open borders for Europe, and tight borders for Israel. The thing they fear most is a re-awakening of the population by any re-emergence of anything to do with Hitler or the National Socialist Party.

There is a reason most religions outlaw usury. Because it doesn’t create positive sum games, so it doesn’t create wealth, it makes deadweight losses. It’s exploitative, and hurts a society, making it poorer. Islam calls it “Riba” and it is haram.

They censor aggressively so people don’t learn the truth, because they know what typically happens to them once we gentiles catch on - they kick them out, even kill them - and there is a reason for that.

Jews are a very paranoid group of people, with a crazy racial supremacist agenda. They think they are special. G-d’s Chosen. Most of them are atheists but they still see themselves as special.

[Lamprecht]

These are the same complaints you see in the middle ages and even earlier. The Jews form a specialized caste within a society and tend to dominate it for their own benefit and to the detriment of the general public. They live high on the hog while they are in power (often with the protection of their bought-and-paid-for elite Gentile collaborators), but things tend to shift against them suddenly and they find themselves on the outs.

That is what was claimed by Norwegian supporters of the act, which I discuss in my previous post;

Lauritz Weidemann, one of he framers of Norway’s constitution, reportedly said:
"The Jewish nation's history proves, that this people always has been rebellious and deceitful, and their religious teachings, the hope of again arising as a nation, so often they have acquired some remarkable fortune, led them to intrigues and to create a state within a state. It is of vital importance to the security of the state that an absolute exception be made about them."
The source on Wikipedia is broken ("Jødeparagrafen – Kronologi 1814") but may be this: https://i.imgur.com/8GFhUL9.jpg


Description of the above image/document is:

1814
Utformingen av Grunnloven på riksforsamlingen på Eidsvoll.
Riksforsamlingen på Eidsvoll
(Sidehenvisninger til riksforsamlingens forhandlinger, bind. 1-5, Kristiania 1914-1918.)

2. april
Sorenskriver Lauritz Weidemanns grunnlovsutkast § 61 går imot at jøder får oppholde seg i landet (1:148).

---

Google Translate: 1814
The drafting of the Constitution at the National Assembly at Eidsvoll.
The National Assembly at Eidsvoll
(References to the National Assembly's negotiations, volumes 1-5, Kristiania 1914-1918.)

2 April
Judge Lauritz Weidemann's draft constitution § 61 opposes Jews being allowed to stay in the country (1: 148).

---

http://web.archive.org/web/201407040337 ... logi/1814/ | http://archive.fo/TYcve

I posted a quote by a Jewish historian that I believe also illustrates your point a bit here:
Media bias, control, & censorship / quotes of note
viewtopic.php?t=605

Somewhat relevant but very interesting quote from Jewish historian William D. Rubinstein, comparing historical European anti-Semitism to 3rd World anti-colonialist movements:

"Over representation in the economic elite of a visible ethnic minority of the degree found in Poland and Hungary was certain to cause trouble regardless of the identity of the group: if Belgians, Bulgarians, or Bolivians had constituted 62 per cent of the highest income-earners of Hungary, rather than Jews, that would certainly engendered resentment against them ... To us [Jews], European antisemitism appears to be a weapon of the strong against the weak, a kind of ideological sadism. To European right-wing nationalists of the post-1870 period, however, antisemitism appeared to be a weapon of the weak against the strong, an attempt (as they saw it) by a downtrodden nation to regain control over its resources from a separate, distinctive minority which appeared to dominate the economy -- an aim not unlike that of anti-colonial movements in the Third World vis-a-vis the Europeans and foreign entrepreneurial minorities (like the Chinese throughout South-East Asia). The Zionist movement understood this perfectly well, however disturbing such a perspective may seem to us viewed with post-Holocaust eyes.
Moreover, research is most likely to demonstrate a very considerable actual Jewish over-representation in many other social and political areas which figured largely in the litany of continental antisemitism of the post-1870 period, especially Jewish participation in the radical left, the liberal professions, in journalism, and in the media."

W. D. Rubinstein, "Jews in the Economic Elites of Western Nations and Antisemitism". Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, nos. 1 and 2, 2000, p. 18-19. https://archive.jpr.org.uk/object-jjs26 or http://web.archive.org/web/201905122057 ... ad?id=2276

It's also found in:
Lessons of the Holocaust: Diversity + Proximity = War?
viewtopic.php?t=12362



Also from the first thread:

[Lamprecht]

Another one that possibly was missed: the Allahdad incident. Less of an expulsion and more of a pogrom + forced conversion. It happened in Iran (or "Persia" as it was called prior to 1935)

From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahdad

Allahdad

Location: Mashhad
Date: 1839
Target: Persian Jews
Attack type: Pogrom, Forced conversion
Deaths: 40+ Jews

The Allahdad (Persian: الله‌داد‎) was an 1839 violent riot and forced conversion against the Jews of Mashhad, Khorasan, Qajar Persia. After forced conversion of the Mashhadi Jews to Islam, many practiced Crypto-Judaism. The incident was important in the aspect that an entire community was forced to convert, and it was one of the first times European Jewry intervened on behalf of Iranian Jews.[1]

The event was first described in Joseph Wolff's 1845 travelogue "Narrative of a mission to Bokhara", in which he wrote:

On Monday, the 11th of March, I arrived at Askerea, two miles distant from Meshed. I had sent on before the King's mehmoondar, and the gholam of the British embassy. The first who came to meet me was Mullah Mehdee (Meshiakh), the Jew with whom I had lodged twelve years ago, and who treated me most hospitably when in distress and misery and poverty, previous to the arrival of Abbas Mirza at Meshed, from Nishapoor. All the Jews of Meshed, a hundred and fifty families, were compelled seven years ago, to turn Mussulmans. The occasion was as follows: A poor woman had a sore hand; a Mussulman physician advised her to kill a dog and put her hand in the blood of it; she did so; when suddenly the whole population rose, and said that they had done it in derision of their Prophet. Thirty-five Jews were killed in a few minutes; the rest, struck with terror, became Muhammedans ; and fanatic and covetous Muhammedans shouted, "Light of Muhammed has fallen upon them!" They are now more zealous Jews in secret than ever; but call themselves, like the Jews in Spain, Anusim, "the compelled ones!" Their children cannot suppress their feelings when their parents call them by their Muhammedan names! But Mullah Mehdee and Mullah Moshe believe in Christ, and Mullah Mehdee asked me to baptize him. He has been of the greatest use to the English in Heraut and Candahar, as his testimonials from Rawlinson and others amply testify.[2]

[...]
Mashhad's ruler[clarification needed] had ordered his men to enter Jewish homes and mobs attacked the Jewish community, burning down the synagogue, looting homes, abducting girls, and killing between 30 and 40 people. With knives held to their throats, the Jewish patriarchs were forced to vocally proclaim their "allegiance" to Islam as it was agreed upon by the leaders of the community that in order to save the remaining 2,400 Jews, everyone must convert. Most converted and stayed in Mashhad, taking on Muslim names, while some left for other Iranian Jewish communities and to Afghanistan. That day became known as the Allahdad ("God’s Justice").[5]

Another pogrom in Iran/Persia, "The 1910 Shiraz blood libel": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiraz_blood_libel

The 1910 Shiraz blood libel was a pogrom of the Jewish quarter in Shiraz, Iran, on October 30, 1910, organized by the apostate Qavam family[1] and sparked by accusations that the Jews had ritually killed a Muslim girl. In the course of the pogrom, 12 Jews were killed and about 50 were injured,[2] and 6,000 Jews of Shiraz were robbed of all their possessions.[3] The event was documented by the representative of the Alliance Israélite Universelle in Shiraz.
...
[1] Laurence D Loeb (4 May 2012). Outcaste (RLE Iran D): Jewish Life in Southern Iran. Routledge. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-136-81277-4. "In 1892, several Jews were murdered in Shiraz (Alliance, 1892:52). Twenty Jews were murdered and three synagogues were burned down in 1897 (Alliance, 1897:87). Pogroms, forced conversion and expulsion swept Zarqon, Lar, Jahrom, Darab, Nobendigan, Sarvestan and Kazerun (Alliance, 1900—1910). Jews abandoned Lar and Jabrom. which were never resettled, and emigrated to Shiraz and thence to Palestine, where they joined the numerous Shirazis who had previously escaped. Just after the holiday of Sukkot in 1910, a pogrom organized by the apostate Qavam family resulted in thirteen deaths, injury, theft. vandalism and near starvation for the 6000 Jews of Shiraz (Alliance, 1910:229—245)."

The footnote #1 seems to suggest that there were additional incidents as well.

[Lamprecht]

Another one missed:

On [26 April] 1654, the Jews of Recife, Brazil were expelled when the Portuguese recaptured the region from the Dutch. These Jews emigrated with Dutch gentiles to "New Holland" (Dutch Brazil) after they fled to the Netherlands following their expulsions from Portugal (and possibly Spain).

Haaretz details this here:

This Day in Jewish History | 1654: Brazil Expels Its Jews. Again
http://archive.fo/gFeox or http://web.archive.org/web/2018/https:/ ... -1.5239811

[JohnDoe1964]

1724 - Jews expelled from Louisiana by Louisiana's Code Noir (not to be confused with the 1685 decree of the same name which it was based on)

Interestingly, the very first article of the code is the expulsion of Jews.

[Lamprecht]

More on the 2014 expulsion of a Jewish sect from a Guatemalan village, which is listed in the OP.

A Guatemalan mayor, Rodolfo Perez, was charged in 2016 for the expulsion of the Jewish sect 2 years prior in a town with a mostly Amerindian population, about 95% of the 10 thousand villagers belonging to the "Tzutujil" ethnic group.

Guatemalan ex-mayor charged in expulsion of Jewish sect

http://archive.fo/sLm8m | http://web.archive.org/web/201606211147 ... wish-sect/

In 2017, he was jailed:

Former Guatemala mayor jailed for expelling Jewish group

http://archive.fo/sZ7DQ | http://web.archive.org/web/201704050123 ... ish-group/

This is despite the fact that even an Israeli court ruled that this ultra-Orthodox sect that was expelled is a "dangerous cult" that abuses children.

Israeli court rules Central American ultra-Orthodox sect is a ‘dangerous cult’

http://archive.fo/PiOIY | http://web.archive.org/web/201704291045 ... rous-cult/

[...] The 500-strong sect has left Israel, Canada and the United States in recent years amid allegations of child abuse and has been dubbed “the Jewish Taliban.”

In 2014, Rodolfo Perez, the mayor of the town of San Juan La Laguna, where they set up, tried to evict them after disputes with neighbors, though he was later indicted for “participating in the expulsion of a religious community.” He was sentenced to a year in prison earlier this month.

During his trial, Perez argued he had given the expulsion order to end “a clash of cultures” with the community.

Why are non-Jews always going around picking on and persecuting Jews when they just simply want to assimilate?

Recommended:

Lessons of the Holocaust: Diversity + Proximity = War?
viewtopic.php?t=12362

[Lamprecht]

In March earlier this year, the remaining Jewish families in Yemen were expelled from the country. Only four elderly Jews remain in Yemen according to this source. The 13 Jews do not want to live in Israel and are asking other countries to let them in.



Houthis Expel the Last of Yemeni Jews
https://web.archive.org/web/20210821160 ... emeni-jews | https://archive.md/d7Wt9

Houthis Expel the Last of Yemeni Jews

Sunday, 28 March, 2021 - 07:30

Houthis have managed to deport the last of Yemen’s Jews by sending 13 members of three different families away from their homes in Sanaa. All that remains from the several–thousand-year-old community are four seniors, sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Looking for a new place to call home, the exiled 13 are refusing to go to Israel and are waiting the UN refugee agency to transport them to any country that grants them asylum.

Their departure from Yemen came after withstanding years of pressure from Houthis and as part of a deal to free Levi Salem Marhabi, a Jew who was captured by the Iran-backed group’s intelligence around six years ago.

Houthis did not honor their own court’s ruling to release Marhabi and used his captivity as a bargaining chip to drive out whatever is left of the Jewish people in areas run by the militia.

So far, Houthis have succeeded in chasing Jews out of the governorates of Sanaa, Saada and Amran. The persecuted minority was moved out of their own country in three different batches.

“They gave us a choice between staying in the midst of harassment and keeping Salem a prisoner or leaving and having him released,” said one of those who were expelled.

“History will remember us as the last of Yemeni Jews who were still clinging to their homeland until the last moment,” they added.

“We had rejected many temptations time and time again, and refused to leave our homeland, but today we are forced.”

Marhabi, languishing in his prison cell in Sanaa, has suffered different kinds of torture and was eventually left partially paralyzed by a stroke.

Marhabi was arrested for aiding a Yemeni Jewish family in moving a very rare deerskin Torah scroll, claimed by some to be 800 years old, out of the war-torn country.

Back in 2015, not long after the Yemeni Civil War broke out, the government of Yemen ordered the Jewish minority to convert to Islam or leave the country. The Times of Israel claims that there are six Jews - rather than four - still living in Yemen. Of these six, one is Levi Salem Marahbi, who was imprisoned for smuggling a Torah.

As 13 Yemeni Jews leave pro-Iran region for Cairo, community of 50,000 down to 6
https://web.archive.org/web/20211024102 ... down-to-6/ | https://archive.md/g3J6d

[borjastick]

Interesting that they chose to avoid israel and it seems chose Cairo where they will be among millions of Arabs. They clearly understand that being with real north African people with a history and culture is better than a bunch of make believe eastern european converts.

[Lamprecht]

Someone made an updated version of the list:

COMPLETE LIST OF ATTEMPTED JEWISH EXPULSIONS, POGROMS, AND RITUAL MURDERS (1,356)
https://justpaste.it/2u9eb | https://archive.fo/ezh1m

[Lamprecht]

Multiple anti-Jewish pogroms took place in Odessa, Ukraine/Russia: 1821, 1859, 1871, 1881 and 1905.

Wikipedia:

1821 pogrom
The 1821 pogrom, perpetrated by ethnic Greeks rather than Russians, is named in some sources as the first in the modern period in Russia:

In Odessa, Greeks and Jews were two rival ethnic and economic communities, living side by side. The first Odessa pogrom, in 1821, was linked to the outbreak of the Greek War for Independence, during which the Jews were accused of sympathizing with the Ottoman authorities and of aiding the Turks in killing the Greek Patriarch of Constantinople, Gregory V, dragging his dead body through the streets and finally throwing it into the Bosphorus.[3]

1859 pogrom
According to the Jewish Encyclopedia (1906 ed.),

The community did not escape the horrors of the pogrom. Indeed, the very first pogrom in Russia occurred in Odessa in the year 1859. This was in reality not a Russian but a Greek pogrom; for the leaders and almost all of the participants were Greek sailors from ships in the harbor, and local Greeks who joined them. The pogrom occurred on a Christian Easter; and the local press, in no wise unfriendly to the Jews, attempted to transform it into an accidental fight, the Greek colony at that time being dominant in the administration as well as in the commerce of Odessa. Further pogroms occurred in 1871, 1881, and 1886."[4]

Historians note economic antagonism between the two urban minorities, in addition to religious frictions.[5]

1871 pogrom
But, after 1871, the pogroms in Odessa took a form more typical of the rest of the Russian empire:

"Although the pogrom of 1871 was occasioned in part by a rumor that Jews had vandalized the Greek community's church, many non-Greeks participated to it. Russian resentment and hostility toward Jews came to the fore in the pogrom of 1871 as Russians joined Greeks in attacks on Jews. Thereafter, Russians filled the ranks of pogromist mobs in 1881, 1900, and 1905."[6]

In the 1881 and 1905 pogroms, many Greek houses were also destroyed.[7]

The 1871 pogrom is seen as a turning point in Russian Jewish history: "The Odessa pogrom led some Jewish publicists, exemplified by the writer Peretz Smolenskin, to question belief in the possibility of Jewish integration into Christian society, and to call for a greater awareness of Jewish national identity."[8]

1881–1906 period
In the post-1871 period, pogroms were often perpetrated with tacit approval of the Tsarist authorities.[9] Evidence exists that during the 1905 pogrom, the army supported the mob:

The Bolshevik Piatnitsky who was in Odessa at the time recalls what happened: "There I saw the following scene: a gang of young men, between 25 and 20 years old, among whom there were plain-clothes policemen and members of the Okhrana, were rounding up anyone who looked like a Jew—men, women and children—stripping them naked and beating them mercilessly... We immediately organised a group of revolutionaries armed with revolvers... we ran up to them and fired at them. They ran away. But suddenly between us and the pogromists there appeared a solid wall of soldiers, armed to the teeth and facing us. We retreated. The soldiers went away, and the pogromists came out again. This happened a few times. It became clear to us that the pogromists were acting together with the military."[10]

1905 Pogrom
The 1905 Pogrom of Odessa was the worst anti-Jewish pogrom in Odessa's history. Between 18 and 22 October 1905, ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, and Greeks killed over 400 Jews and damaged or destroyed over 1600 Jewish properties.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odessa_pogroms