One revealing facet of the campaign is the associated website. This is currently being developed, but at the outset it consisted of slogans on posters and a 26 second video:
https://www.againstholocaustdistortion.org/
What this reveals is that you can't refute a doctrine without engaging with it intellectually. There is no link to Holocaust Controversies for example. All they have done thus far is to combine a couple of sheets of A4 worth of description, misrepresentation and ad hominem attacks with some graphics on a handful of web pages.
So in a way, it confirms Robert Faurisson's view of the victory of revisionism at the scholarly level. They simply have virtually nothing to say in response. In fact, the campaign may well backfire, as it will draw in the curious, who will then be surprised at the lack of content and wonder how you can know something unless you suspend judgement and consider both sides.
It may be though, that revisionist material is now sufficiently well hidden on search engines that they think people won't be able to find it. You can find the cross-examination of Hilberg by lawyer Douglas Christie, who was advised by Faurisson, here:
http://www.ihr.org/books/kulaszka/09hilberg.html
