"Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
gl0spana
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 1:22 am

"Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby gl0spana » 2 years 11 months ago (Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:04 pm)

Have not heard the revisionist take on this book.

I know you guys discount testimonies in general, but what about secret recordings?

"Between 1939 and 1942, a division of the British Directorate of Military Intelligence created a number of PoW interrogation camps in and around London. Sophisticated tapping equipment was installed and secret gramophone recording were made of private conversations between senior German staff officers.

In this extraordinary work Professor Neitzel examines these transcripts in depth for the first time. His findings are truly revealing and address important questions regarding the officers’ attitudes towards the German leadership and Nazi policies: How did the German generals judge the overall war situation? From what date did they consider it lost? How did they react to the attempt on Hitler’s life in July 1944? What knowledge did they have of the atrocities?"

The evidence here is pretty damning IMO, unless these transcriptions are fabricated. They were transcribed, so technically they would be easy to fabricate, but its still unlikely. If they contained blatant untruths, wouldn't these have seen the light much earlier than they did?

Interestingly enough, you can see they are well aware of allied propaganda, but note how easily many of them seem to accept this information, all while remaining at least partially sympathetic to the Nazi cause.

I went through the first 100 documents for references of Jews, included below:

The book is here for your own perusal

https://ru.b-ok2.org/book/3316468/fcfdd5



Document 13
CSDIC (UK), SR REPORT, SRGG 342 [TNA, WO 208/4166]
LUDWIG CRÜWELL–General der Panzertruppe–Captured 29 May 42 in
North Africa.
GOTTHART FRANTZ–Generalleutnant (GOC 19th Flak Division)–
Captured 12 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 12 Aug. 43
CRÜWELL: If no decision has been reached next year–and I see in that our
greatest hope–the Americans will get out of the European war. After all,
what do they want here? What interest have they in ITALY? What has
GERMANY done to them? They’ve made a mass of money as usual –
they’ve no love for the English–and above all, they recognise the Jewish
poison at work among their people and realise how they are blackmailing
their leaders. We see the Jewish poison in this heavy attack on
HAMBURG.29 It is the Jews who want to destroy us down to the last
man. They know that the National Socialist doctrine will spread all over
the world and they want to save themselves by hook or by crook from
their inevitable extinction. [. . .]


Document 17
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 139
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 3 June 44
[TNA, WO 208/4363]
NEUFFER: You can say what you like, but the highest Generals did take
part in that whole business, from 1941 onwards. There were certainly
plenty of Generals at the FÜHRER’s headquarters, who said: ‘Certainly,
my FÜHRER,’ JODL37 and KEITEL for a start. You can’t say that they
did not share the responsibility from the way in which they let FRITSCH
be treated,38 in 1934, when BREDOW was shot and SCHLEICHER.39
Those were serious things. That was their last opportunity, in my opinion,
Isn’t that so?
KREIPE: Yes.
NEUFFER: If you look at it historically, everything points of course to the
fact that at any rate in a Western European state–which we, after all, are–
that form of dictatorship, which is pure terrorism, is impossible in the
long run.
KREIPE: I consider too that all those ways which have been found of
killing off the Jews are disgraceful. [. . .]





Document 37
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 197
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 20–1 Sept.
44 [TNA, WO 208/4363]
[Conversation between General HEINZ EBERBACH and his son Oblt. z.S.
HEINZ EUGEN EBERBACH]

FATHER: No, no, we are . . . by a certain lack of humanity and decency
which one must have, because otherwise the pendulum of history swings
against you. I told you that once before, in connection with that history
book I always carried about with me, that that is one of the things I have
learned from history. In my opinion, one can even go so far as to say that
the killing of those million Jews or however many it was, was necessary
in the interests of our people. But to kill the women and children wasn’t
necessary. That is going too far.
SON: Well, if you are going to kill off the Jews, then kill the women and
children too, or the children at least. There is no need to do it publicly,
but what good does it do me to kill off the old people?
FATHER: Well, simply that it is contrary to humanity, in the end it hits back
at you, simply because it instils a certain brutality into the people –and
there are some incidents that I have just learned about from the officers
here who witnessed them themselves–the numbers of Poles we have
killed, at least a million, the numbers we have killed in YUGOSLAVIA–I
never knew that either, nor did I ever take part in it. The tens of
thousands of Russians we have killed, not only Poles!
SON: Yes, but even if that’s true, they were people who conducted guerrilla
warfare against us, so there again it wasn’t without justification


Document 94
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 676 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
GEORG NEUFFER–Generalmajor (GOC, 20th Flak Division)–Captured 9
May 43 in Tunisia.
GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 19 Dec. 43
BASSENGE (re BBC midnight news in German237): They dished up the
mass executions of Jews in POLAND. They estimate here that altogether
five million Jews–Polish, Bulgarian, Dutch, Danish and Norwegian–have
been massacred.
NEUFFER: Really? Not counting the German ones?
BASSENGE: Including the German Jews, during the whole time. They
furnished evidence that an enormous number from camp so-and-so
between such-and-such a date, fifteen thousand here, eighteen thousand
there, twelve thousand there, six thousand and so on–I must say that if 10
per cent of it is correct, then one ought to–
NEUFFER: I should have thought about three million.
BASSENGE: You know, it really is a disgrace.
NEUFFER: This trial, which has been going on at CHARKOV is really
very unpleasant for HITLER too.238
BASSENGE: Yes, The Generaloberst239 (PW) was talking today about the
SEYDLITZ people.240 He said that we must understand that it was only
human that those people, who have been through it, should now try to
find the reasons and the people responsible for it. If they, in their state of
mental depression, adopt that attitude, we mustn’t judge them too
harshly, even though one is bound to condemn it. He was trying to gloss
it over.
NEUFFER: He is frightfully uncertain.
BASSENGE: The first man here to join the SEYDLITZ . . . will be von
BROICH (PW). That’s dead certain. He said today: ‘I would join them at
once.’


Document 40
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 204
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 27–9 Oct. 44
[TNA, WO 208/4364]
REIMANN: The business with the Jews in GERMANY was quite right,
only it should have been done quietly. Anyway, I’m very pleased that the
English suffered a real blow at ARNHEM.98
[. . .]
CHOLTITZ: Have you read CHURCHILL’s speech? Appalling, beyond all
words! A Jewish brigade to go to GERMANY! Then the French will take
the West and the Poles the East. The hate in that speech! I am completely
shattered.99
NEUFFER: Don’t forget that the man was probably still somewhat worked
up about the ARNHEM business.
SCHLIEBEN: Well, we’ve known for a long time that the enemy won’t
present us with any bouquets.

Document 85
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRM 175 [TNA, WO 208/4165]
LUDWIG CRÜWELL–General der Panzertruppe–Captured 29 May 42 in
North Africa.
WILHEIM RITTER VON THOMA–General der Panzertruppe–Captured 4
Nov. 42 in North Africa.
Information received: 14 Feb. 43
THOMA: A Staatsanwalt from MINSK came to see me in March; he was
really a BERLIN Staatsanwalt. He was a man in the forties and he
begged me to do everything in my power to enable him to join up as a
soldier in any capacity–he was a NCO on the reserve. He said: ‘I can’t
stand the things that are going on here any longer.’ Then he told me the
kind of thing that happened. I know myself that there were actually
savage, brutalised louts there, who trampled on the bellies of pregnant
women, and that sort of thing.
CRÜWELL: Yes, but those are very isolated cases for which even the SS
can’t be blamed. I can’t believe that Germans would do such a thing!
THOMA: I don’t think I should have believed it either, if I hadn’t actually
seen it. I made two written reports about it. I feel that no one can accuse
me of having been in any way responsible for it.
CRÜWELL: What did you report in writing?
THOMA: The atrocities perpetrated by the SS and the shootings and the
mass executions at PSKIP(?) and at MINSK–two pages of typescript
which I sent to the OKW.
211
I received no reply. I established that no
soldiers were ever involved, only a special detachment of the SS. They
introduced the name ‘Rollkommando.’ It’s no good denying it. Of course,
these people have become completely brutalised by months of such
conduct.
CRÜWELL: I am the last to want to defend such atrocities but, taking the
broad view, you must admit that we were bound to take the most
incredibly severe measures to combat the illegal guerrilla warfare in
those vast territories.
THOMA: Yes, but the women had nothing whatever to do with it. Orders
were actually given that all Jews were (to be cleared out of) the occupied
territories–that is the great idea, but, of course, there are so many in the
east that you don’t know where to start.212


Document 89
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 495 [TNA, WO 208/4166]
FRIEDRICH FREIMERR VON BROICH (GOC 10th Panzer Division)–
Captured 12 May 43 in Tunisia.
EGERSDORF–Oberst (Commander, TUNIS)–Captured 8 May 43 in
Tunisia. ULRICH BOES–Major (Staff Officer to Generalleutnant von
SPONECK (PW))–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 21 Oct. 43
?: We can’t complain if they ever stand on German soil and simply raze . . .
completely to the ground, or deport the people into concentration camps
and make them work. We have done exactly the same sort of thing.
?: If anyone had any doubts about it, he was enlightened in no uncertain
manner by our behaviour in all the occupied territories–I witnessed it in
GREECE too.224
?: The soldiers . . . the best propaganda for the THIRD REICH that you
could possible imagine. These people in FRANCE and in the BALKANS
whom I met were enthusiastic about the discipline of the Germany army.
And the very moment the Party and the SS took over the control, even the
most harmless citizens became fanatics–against us. I mean, is that wise
or is it part of the creed? If that were really a part of National Socialism,
then National Socialism would be the greatest crime there is. But it isn’t
so by any means–National Socialism is actually a wonderful creed. The
people who are at present playing first fiddle aren’t National Socialists at
all; they are criminals.
?: If GERMANY is destroyed in this war, so that even our private lives
cease to be our own, do you think that generations to come will curse
these people?
?: I have to admit that mistakes have been made.
?: That is quite beside the point. Mistakes have been made in every age by
every nation. The point is that the men in authority are bad characters of
a low type; that is the criminal part of it. That is vastly different from
‘making mistakes’.
?: I don’t want to accuse the government, but I think the manner in which
we have behaved towards the rest of the world is so shameless that even
our children will blush. In my opinion no greater outrage to civilisation
than this mass murder of innocent people who have done nothing beyond
the fact that perhaps they had been circumcised or had belonged to some
other race . . . Are there any pure races left now?
?: BAYERLEIN once told me about the ghettos in WARSAW;
225 he was
taken round at the time. He said it makes him shudder to think of it.
Twenty-four people living in one room, and the bread ration so calculated
that 1 per cent and 2 per cent were bound to die every week.
?: In the long run we owe the fact that we got out of the mess again entirely
to National Socialism. Nobody else brought it off; we tried all ways–with
Herr BRÜNING and Herr–
?: But after all we too witnessed it; if it hadn’t been the FÜHRER it would
have been someone else, who might have done it in a different way.
?: You can’t say that. We can only say that he was the one–all the rest is
theory.
?: Of course everything else is theory, but what you are saying isn’t entirely
devoid of theory either; because, if he hadn’t turned up, it would
probably have developed more slowly and a slow steady development is
often better than a blow-up of that sort. I should feel happier at any rate
and the German people too, I feel sure.
?: At any rate I don’t believe that a hundred years hence history will say:
‘We have the FÜHRER to thank for our resurrection after 1918’; but it
will unfortunately have to say: ‘We have him to thank for the loss of our
independence.’ That will be the final judgment.
?: Yes, and above all it will . . . as a step back into the darkest ages . . .
?: Yes–barbarity.
?: There has never been anything like it except the Thirty Years’ War. In the
Thirty Years’ War it wasn’t so conspicuous because conditions were
different then, but nowadays it is damned conspicuous.
?: We have shown clearly that we are completely incapable of ruling other
people.
?: Yes, such a ‘ruling class’ . . .
?: How could a thing like that last? And quite apart from states further
away, just think of BOHEMIA and MORAVIA alone–do you think that
could have gone on for a few more years?
?: POLAND–they would continually have killed off our local leaders.
?: We can’t compare ourselves with ENGLAND in the slightest degree. Ask
the people in South-West (AFRICA). They think they’re very well off
under English rule.
?: I mean, at the beginning ENGLAND used quite different means when
establishing her world empire, from those she uses now.
?: Yes, we wanted to establish a world empire only four years after we had
introduced general conscription!
?: No, this is how I look at it. Owing to the war there is no doubt that
measures have become more severe–but they had to.
?: Well, nobody objects to the fact that everybody plays his part in the war
and so on, but I am convinced that no educated, thinking person
considers it right the way we have behaved towards the Jews, the Poles
and the Czechs and towards the people of opposite views in the
concentration camps.
?: But that German-speaking Germans at DANZIG should be forbidden to
join GERMANY simply because some arrogant English government
forbids it–that they feel unhappy there and–
?: Quite right, but that is very different from trying to exterminate whole
peoples.
?: Well, I don’t think that was our intention.
?: Well, perhaps we didn’t intend it, but we have done it. When somebody
tells me that at LODZ or the devil knows where, eighteen thousand Jews
have been killed in one morning–
?: Well, say its eighteen hundred. Do you think that’s right–or even onehundred-and-eighty? Even if it’s eighteen, if they haven’t committed any
crime! What right have we to indignation about the massacres of
KATYN? Heaven forbid, if the Russians ever open these mass-graves!
They are now claiming–of course it can’t be checked up–that we killed
seventeen thousand at KIEV alone.226 The Russians are thirsting for
revenge.
?: Well, at any rate the Russians who are in our service consider themselves
well off, because they are treated decently, as human beings.227
?: The Germans are decent fellows; that’s the tragic part of it. The
unfortunate thing is that the Germans show themselves to others in quite
a different light and not as they really are. Quite the contrary, make
enquiries in the former occupied territories that we held in the years
1914–18. The people there still hold the German soldiers in high esteem,
as I was able to prove time and time again when we were there this time.
But I shouldn’t like to go twenty years hence to the districts which have
been . . . by the SS and the SA. These press-gangs–oh, no! A tragedy to
live to see such things!
BOES: On the other hand you only need to ask our people in the
RHINELAND how they were treated.
?: But that’s quite different! I admit they shot SCHLAGETER, because he
carried out sabotage on the railway but he’s the only one we can
produce.228
?: Yes, but there are sure to have been others who weren’t executed but . . .
in prisons.
?: Good God, but we’ve massacred people in their thousands. There’s no
comparison. At least there were proper courts, before which they
appeared. In my opinion, if hundreds or thousands had been shot, we
should certainly know about it, they would be . . . as martyrs. Those six
or seven or twelve martyrs of the movement!229
BOES: The point is that one is the struggle for a new order in EUROPE–
opposing it stands a world empire, that won this world empire for itself
perhaps hundreds of years ago. The one has still to win its empire; that
costs sacrifices; while the other one has already passed that stage.
?: We shall never win it by these means; on the contrary, by these means we
have shown that if it’s possible for anyone to have the leadership in
EUROPE, it must in no circumstances be us. Then the whole of
EUROPE would rise as one man against us as far as they have any
feelings of decency left–that is what we have achieved. For that is what
they are without any doubt, EUROPE’s birth-pangs–whether the child
will be still-born, we do not yet know; this uniting of great areas into a
single empire–that is in process of creation and will come one way or the
other. Who will predominate is not yet known. I am afraid that we have
shown, unfortunately that we could never exert a predominance like that
because we are simply not morally in a position to do so–no longer in a
position, because everything which used to be admired in a German has
been changed to the opposite in the course of the last fourteen, or rather
ten years. There is no longer any justice, there is no longer any decency;
there is nothing but force and brutal suppression of opinion and of the
right to live and think and so on. A tyranny such as ours has hardly ever
existed before, and I am convinced that, however the war had ended, the
next generation, at least would, figuratively speaking, have gone about
with daggers in their pockets. The young people would not have put up
with it in the long run either, for no country has ever had a tyranny like
this. To modify it–that can’t be done, because that is the curse of the
wicked deed–they could no longer do that because by then there would
be many too many who wanted to avenge themselves.
BOES: Have you experienced this tyranny yourself, Sir, or your family?
?: Well, comparatively little, because I am a soldier and they have not dared
to come near us. In one small case I have experienced it, where such
difficulties and scenes were made for an officer’s wife, simply because
she had unwittingly bought a few glasses from a Jewish household, and
was then denounced by a maid. She was said also to have criticised the
regime at home, while in fact she was an ardent National Socialist–she
won’t be one any longer.
?: We soldiers are by far the best off in this respect. From what I have heard
from my friends who have not enjoyed the protection of being a soldier,
their treatment is very different. Even now, I am still a good National
Socialist, but in the . . . sense. Those are no National Socialists.
?: The FÜHRER’s greatest fault is that he does not think like normal people
do.


Document 91
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 647 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
HANS CRAMER–General der Panzertruppe (GOC German Afrika Korps)–
Captured 12 May 43 in Tunisia.
KLAUS HUBBUCH–Leutnant (ADC to Generalmajor BOROWIETZ
(PW)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 10 Dec. 43
HUBBUCH (re executions in POLAND and RUSSIA): They are these
bands that are taken prisoner and are then put beside their graves and
shot–and moreover all of them. None of them are taken prisoner and
treated as soldiers, but they are shot.
CRAMER: Yes, that’s what I always say too. Outrages have certainly been
committed, so-and-so many Jews have been killed and Heaven only
knows what, but so far I have never found anyone who has admitted to
me that he has witnessed it in person. I am firmly convinced that terrible
atrocities . . . but at present I haven’t any proof of it.


Document 93
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 666 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
HANS REIMANN–Oberst (Commander, Panzer Grenadier Regiment 86)–
KURT KÖHNCKE–Oberstleutnant (Commander, 372 Heavy Flak
Battery)–Captured 8 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 19 Dec. 43
REIMANN (re atrocities in RUSSIA): It’s true this time. Tell me one thing,
in the 1914–18 war did you ever believe in your own mind that a German
soldier was capable of doing things like that?
KÖHNCKE: Never.
REIMANN: Never–do you really believe it now?
KÖHNCKE: I have heard so much about it, that I have to believe it. I
myself haven’t been there so I can’t pass an opinion.
REIMANN: A senior police official actually told me about it in the train,
that they had shot thousands of Jewish men, women and children at
BERDICHEV and ZHITOMIR236–he actually told me about it without
my asking and he gave such a horrid and vivid description of it that I
brought out a bottle of vodka from my bag on the rack and changed the
conversation to something else and drank with the fellow. And I’ve also
heard about it from other people. He told me about it with the
businesslike calm of a professional murderer.


Document 94
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 676 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
GEORG NEUFFER–Generalmajor (GOC, 20th Flak Division)–Captured 9
May 43 in Tunisia.
GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 19 Dec. 43
BASSENGE (re BBC midnight news in German237): They dished up the
mass executions of Jews in POLAND. They estimate here that altogether
five million Jews–Polish, Bulgarian, Dutch, Danish and Norwegian–have
been massacred.
NEUFFER: Really? Not counting the German ones?
BASSENGE: Including the German Jews, during the whole time. They
furnished evidence that an enormous number from camp so-and-so
between such-and-such a date, fifteen thousand here, eighteen thousand
there, twelve thousand there, six thousand and so on–I must say that if 10
per cent of it is correct, then one ought to–
NEUFFER: I should have thought about three million.
BASSENGE: You know, it really is a disgrace.
NEUFFER: This trial, which has been going on at CHARKOV is really
very unpleasant for HITLER too.238
BASSENGE: Yes, The Generaloberst239 (PW) was talking today about the
SEYDLITZ people.240 He said that we must understand that it was only
human that those people, who have been through it, should now try to
find the reasons and the people responsible for it. If they, in their state of
mental depression, adopt that attitude, we mustn’t judge them too
harshly, even though one is bound to condemn it. He was trying to gloss
it over.
NEUFFER: He is frightfully uncertain.
BASSENGE: The first man here to join the SEYDLITZ . . . will be von
BROICH (PW). That’s dead certain. He said today: ‘I would join them at
once.’




GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 20 Dec. 43
THOMA: In ATHENS two years ago, Sepp DIETRICH told me personally–
I have known him for twenty years. I said to him: ‘That’s a nice business!
Civilians are simply shot, are they? It’s the same psychosis as we . . . in
1914 when everyone was just shot–people seeing spies everywhere and
so on’; He said: ‘I don’t care; once they’ve been shot, I shall be left in
peace.’241 ‘Yes,’ I said, ‘but that is a very dangerous solution, particularly
for those who order it.’ He replied: ‘That doesn’t worry me, I’m keeping
the last bullet for myself.’ He himself is a remarkably energetic man. I
hardly think that he would let himself be taken alive. If they captured
him, it would only be by accident–and he’ll take good care to prevent
that. But it is a dreadful thing when one thinks that the men in (military)
uniform are ordering things like that.
NEUFFER: I don’t believe it. I don’t believe that the army has anything to
do with it. It is all propaganda . . .
THOMA: It is propaganda too, but, of course–firstly there are the notices,
signed by the town major. They know here who the town major is, they
know it is so-and-so and there they have it. But it is a scandalous
business. There are no end of cases.
NEUFFER: Yesterday evening we reckoned that, according to all reports,
five million Jews must have been killed by us up to date.
THOMA: I mean, it’s a psychological disease which has spread throughout
the Party, not the Army, that everything Jewish must be exterminated –
they have orders to do it. I remember in the spring of 1942, when their
airmen were always dropping that ‘Freedom Pamphlet’ with a facsimile
in it of the order signed by HITLER about shooting of Commissars, etc. I
wasn’t there–I asked the GSO I, Ops: ‘Have we still got the order?’ He
replied: ‘No, we had to destroy it.’

Document 97
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 815 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
GEORG NEUFFER–Generalmajor (GOC, 20th Flak Division)–Captured 9
May 43 in Tunisia.
GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 2 Feb. 44
NEUFFER: The Russians haven’t reached the spot yet where those largescale mass murders took place.
BASSENGE: Were they on such a large scale?
NEUFFER: Yes, Russian and Polish Jews. That was what I was telling you
about, how they did away with thousands of them, with all sorts of
accompanying horrors. KATYN was child’s play in comparison.
BASSENGE: Oh, were the numbers so much higher?
NEUFFER: Yes, of course. That is not even counting the German Jews.
That hasn’t all been brought to light yet. I mean to say, they sometimes
talk about it in their propaganda, but–. For instance, for fun they would
drive train-loads of Jews out–in the winter–and in a wooded country–I
know it from V. BROICH (PW), you can ask him yourself–
OPPENHEIM,245 that famous FRANKFURT Jew, who had those racing
stables, they stopped the train, made him and the others get out and
chased them into the woods in the bitter cold. I mean to say, when all that
is found out. The trouble is that unfortunately it is nearly all true. On the
contrary, they (Allies) have no idea of what really happened.
BASSENGE: That OPPENHEIM was the man who, during the Great War,
established one of the largest military reserve-hospitals we had in
GERMANY, at FRANKFURT; I happen to know that.
NEUFFER: That makes no difference.
BASSENGE: His wife is an ‘Aryan’ and she is a school-friend of my
mother’s. She and my mother went to school together at FRANKFURT.
NEUFFER: I don’t suppose she is alive now, is she?
BASSENGE: Well, I never heard of her again.
NEUFFER: Their pretext in the case of the Polish and Russian Jews–and
undoubtedly it was to some extent justified–was that the Jews would
have assisted the partisans or had done so already. Good Heavens, for
one thing the Jews are afraid, and for another thing you can’t blame them
for working against us. But things are always like that with us; sheer
mass murder.
246 Our Luftgau hadn’t much room at SMOLENSK;
therefore two-thirds of them were stationed at MINSK, among others
also all the workshops, tailors, shoemakers and so on. All the craftsmen
there were Jews, and sometimes they failed to appear–they had been shot
by the Gestapo. As a result, those people didn’t want to leave their
workshops any more.
BASSENGE: And couldn’t your Luftgau commander have kept some
craftsmen for himself?
NEUFFER: Well, FISCHER247 was a perfect fool in that respect. I have
nothing against him otherwise, but that man hasn’t the faintest idea of
military matters. Then he was so stupid in the things he said, he told his
driver when they encountered large crowds of people at SMOLENSK:
‘Oh, just drive on at full speed, it doesn’t matter if you run over a few of
them.’ etc. He had no conscience in that respect.

Document 102
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 176
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 19–21 Aug.
44 [TNA, WO 208/4363]
HELLWIG: I am not of the opinion that the FÜHRER is a criminal and that
his intentions were evil.
KLENK: No, let’s put it like this: the ideas are all right and the ideas are all
you can wish for but the executive organs are definitely criminal.
HELLWIG: Yes, that’s true enough.
KLENK: I mean to say that their methods, for instance, are criminal.
HELLWIG: Yes, their behaviour towards the Jews and the Poles.
KLENK: We didn’t know any figures, but my God, when you hear the
approximate figure! Gosh! Of course the enemy will have a right to say:
‘Men who condone such things must be evil.’ A very simple formula. A
world order exists and we have sinned against it.
HELLWIG: Well, our world order is really based on faith, on religion.
KLENK: We have all repudiated that!
HELLWIG: That is stupid; I mean to say that it makes no difference which
religion it is, whether it’s Roman Catholicism or the Evangelical faith;
they are all based on faith, belief, goodness etc.
KLENK: In the last resort this is the foundation of any world order;
whoever goes against these laws of world order will be held responsible
by a world tribunal. That behaviour of ours towards English officers was
dreadful too.
HELLWIG: Have you ever spoken to Americans? I never knew they could
be as cordial.
KLENK: Yes, they’re ready to help any good fellow. You can’t say they’ve
any hatred.
HELLWIG: No hate at all! How badly we’ve been brought up! Hatred! The
manner in which we treated the Jews was wrong.
KLENK: Those methods were quite wrong.
HELLWIG: They should have been allowed to leave the country with all
their money.
KLENK: Why not? Send them out of the country; get rid of them in a
decent way, but not . . .
HELLWIG: Children have been shot!
KLENK: The numbers must have been colossal.
HELLWIG: I was at GOMEL . . . at RYECHITSA; there is a wood with
sand dunes where hundreds of Jewish men, women and children lay
buried. I wouldn’t believe it; it was behind our lines in RUSSIA. I
thought it was an exaggeration until I myself saw children of four or five,
girls of fourteen, fifteen and sixteen . . .256
KLENK: It’s shattering!
HELLWIG: One thing strikes me: The individual counts for nothing in
National Socialism. You never hear a friendly word spoken; you never
hear our losses mentioned; everything is just thrown in ruthlessly as a
matter of course by the higher commander and the most ruthless
commander gets the Knight’s Cross, the ‘Oak Leaves’ and the ‘Swords’.
It’s dreadful! I breathed a sign of relief after being with the Americans;
they’re human beings.

Document 106
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 189
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 29 Aug. 44
[TNA, WO 208/4364]
CHOLTITZ: The worst job I ever carried out–which however I carried out
with great consistency–was the liquidation of the Jews. I carried out this
order down to the very last detail.265
THOMA: The whole thing is done on HITLER’s orders. EBERBACH said
yesterday again: ‘HITLER has no idea that the people have been
hanged.’ Ha! Ha! Ha! It’s a good thing that you can now produce such
unimpeachable proofs.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Hannover » 2 years 11 months ago (Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:44 pm)

LOL
Note that we do not hear the alleged recordings for verification.

More on the fake "conversations":

yet another bogus conversation, this one about 'gassings'
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=352

The bogus Bruns document
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t= ... ight=bruns

Bogus alleged 'conversation' about Babi Yar
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=345

recorded conversations not - 'pumpkins/music directors'
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=366

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Hannover » 2 years 11 months ago (Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:23 pm)

I could copy & paste some "conversations" about the reality of witchcraft too.

And notice that gl0spana still cannot tell us how his alleged 'gas chambers' supposedly worked and he cannot show us the mega millions of human remains that are alleged to be in known locations.

- Hannover

gl0spana and his "Holocau$t Industry" in court:
'Please your honor, there really are millions upon millions of human remains buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show them to the court. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

gl0spana
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 1:22 am

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby gl0spana » 2 years 11 months ago (Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:55 pm)

LOL I'm no zionist

but lets see

10,000 pages, if they are fraudulent, how would you go about doing this

A - Is it the transcriber(s)? Is he operating alone or being guided(directed to do it)? What of the risks of getting caught (if they brought in someone else to listen to the transcripts)? Surely there are powerful incentives at play here. Was the transcriber Jewish?

B - Were the documents were modified after the fact? Someone had to break in or borrow the documents and make careful changes, introduce new entries. According to Neitzel:

"Timo von Choltitz, the son of Dietrich von Choltitz, one of the generals
mentioned in Tapping Hitler’s Generals, even had the Stuttgart state office
of criminal investigation analyse the typefaces of the transcripts to confirm
his suspicion that they were a fake. The examination of course did not
reveal any irregularities."

C - The entire investigation is made up, every document is totally fabricated - the historian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%B6nke_Neitzel may be in on it

I think we may have stumbled upon something here.

And again, a salient question, why did such a collection take so long to see the light of day? Was not used in Nuremberg I believe. This suggests its origin may be much more recent.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10395
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Hannover » 2 years 11 months ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:22 am)

You have not shown us "10,000" documents, just alleged quotes of alleged English translations of recordings that you cannot produce.

Those writing such text are no different than those who wrote that witchcraft was real.
People lie. People lie for variety of reasons and interests.
You are aware that people do lie, yes?

You are aware that fakes / forgeries were, are quite common for alleged events of WWII. This forum has tons of them.
quick examples:
Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud / German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions : http://codoh.com/library/document/3276
ex.:

and:
Forgeries galore ! [Part II : Wetzel to Lohse] : http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=73

Your desperate strawman is noted. No one says all WWII documents are fakes.

And as usual you dodged the damning information I posted, This time regarding those laughably fake "conversations".

Zionist Wikipedia for anything to do with WWII and whatever is of value & interest to Zionists / Jews? LOL

Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet: http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-a ... =wikipedia

Wikipedia Co-Founder: Site’s Neutrality Is ‘Dead’ Thanks to Leftist Bias: https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/05/ ... tist-bias/

Only lies require fakes & forgeries.
Only lies require censorship.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 11 months ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:36 am)

gl0spana wrote:The evidence here is pretty damning IMO, unless these transcriptions are fabricated.

Damning for what and whom? I read a few of those and don't see the relevance. It's supposedly just "secret recordings" of German POWs but without the actual recording part.

Please explain what is so "damning" about these entries
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Hektor » 2 years 11 months ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:12 am)

Lamprecht wrote:
gl0spana wrote:The evidence here is pretty damning IMO, unless these transcriptions are fabricated.

Damning for what and whom? I read a few of those and don't see the relevance. It's supposedly just "secret recordings" of German POWs but without the actual recording part.

Please explain what is so "damning" about these entries

Moving tons of evidence in boxes around and onto the evidence table is a form of court room theatrics.
Especially, when you can't show originals for verification and offer the content up for scrutiny.

But lets give the benefit of the doubt and say that there are physical recordings of conversations of people in British custody. What would that mean? If I have the time and means and apparently they have - I'll get some useful stuff. And that can even be stimulated by inserting a provocateur into the group of the tapped.

Otium

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Otium » 2 years 11 months ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:14 am)

I'll probably respond to this in full later.

But to sum up what I think about this:

I think these conversations are morso going to be accepted because they use the power of suggestion. When you have a conversation you are discussing your opinion and stating certainties whether you know all the facts or not. Conversations are inherently devoid of context, especially amongst people you know. There's a level of understanding you have with certain people that you don't need nuance or explanation. This can mean you act in a certain way or tailor your words to them, what they think, what they want to hear etc. This is the nature of conversation. These conversations cannot be proof, not without substantial evidence to legitimize what's being said. But because the public in regards to the Germans in WW2 is primed for atrocity porn, they will read these transcripts and through the power of suggestion, they provoke the reader to drop all their mental faculties and uncritically accept whatever it is they're reading and force into empty voids in their minds, conclusions about Germans committing atrocities that they otherwise wouldn't assume had they not been primed for that preconceived outcome. Relying on these kinds of conversations as above supplementary information is totally disregarding the human condition. Readers want answers, they think they've been given, thus they're satisfied and don't think too hard about it.

If some guy thinks a million Jews were killed, he's probably right. Because there were many Jewish partisans. That's not proof of the Holocaust and during war it is legal. Rumours about extermination were also heavily prevalent, being spread through the world press and started by Partisans, Polish, Soviet, Jewish etc. these rumours, as we know, made their way even to Hitler. So, if some of these German POWS repeat things they think are true because they were convinced by some rumour, or corroboration from some other guy who also fell under the impression rumours are true, then it's re-enforcing dogma. You just have to be skeptical and understand the nature of misinformation, false information, grains of truth, exaggerations, disinformation etc. all things unavoidable in life generally. These German soldiers are no more immune to it that you or I.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 11 months ago (Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:07 am)

OP posted:
Document 94
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 676 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
GEORG NEUFFER–Generalmajor (GOC, 20th Flak Division)–Captured 9
May 43 in Tunisia.
GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 19 Dec. 43
BASSENGE (re BBC midnight news in German237): They dished up the
mass executions of Jews in POLAND. They estimate here that altogether
five million Jews–Polish, Bulgarian, Dutch, Danish and Norwegian–have
been massacred.
NEUFFER: Really? Not counting the German ones?
BASSENGE: Including the German Jews, during the whole time. They
furnished evidence that an enormous number from camp so-and-so
between such-and-such a date, fifteen thousand here, eighteen thousand
there, twelve thousand there, six thousand and so on–I must say that if 10
per cent of it is correct, then one ought to–
NEUFFER: I should have thought about three million.
BASSENGE: You know, it really is a disgrace.
NEUFFER: This trial, which has been going on at CHARKOV is really
very unpleasant for HITLER too.238
BASSENGE: Yes, The Generaloberst239 (PW) was talking today about the
SEYDLITZ people.240 He said that we must understand that it was only
human that those people, who have been through it, should now try to
find the reasons and the people responsible for it. If they, in their state of
mental depression, adopt that attitude, we mustn’t judge them too
harshly, even though one is bound to condemn it. He was trying to gloss
it over.
NEUFFER: He is frightfully uncertain.
BASSENGE: The first man here to join the SEYDLITZ . . . will be von
BROICH (PW). That’s dead certain. He said today: ‘I would join them at
once.’

- Bassenge is repeating what he has been told happened. This is called hearsay
- Neuffer first appears to be shocked, asking "really?"
- Bassenge claims the allies "furnished evidence"
- This was supposedly recorded during the war, when was it published and is there any audio/video?
- They are discussing the Kharkov show trial
- There is no statement here of any of these individuals personally witnessing alleged exterminations or gassings
- None of these two individuals claim to have been at an "extermination camp" or any concentration camp with homicidsl gas chambers

What is damning exactly? Prisoners of war are told their side committed enormous atrocities in a place that they were not stationed. Even if it's untrue, some are bound to believe it, especially if "evidence" of some sort is given to them.

Do you have anything more than unverifiable hearsay?
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

gl0spana
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 1:22 am

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby gl0spana » 2 years 11 months ago (Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:10 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:
Do you have anything more than unverifiable hearsay?



oh yeah the postings get way more incriminating as you go further down

Document 130
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 272
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 16–19 Mar.
45 [TNA, WO 208/4177]
HEYDTE: There’s another camp which is even worse than LUBLIN; it’s in
CZECHOSLOVAKIA. Half-a-million people have been put to death
there for certain. I know that all the Jews from BAVARIA were taken
there. Yet the camp never became over- crowded.326
WILDERMUTH: Yes, I’ve heard of that too.
HEYDTE: But I don’t only know that all the Jews from BAVARIA were
taken there, I know that all the Jews from AUSTRIA were taken there,
and still the camp wasn’t over-crowded.
WILDERMUTH: From all over GERMANY. It appears that most of the
Jews from GERMANY were either sent to LUBLIN or to that place.
HEYDTE: I was also told that the Jews are simply gassed in a gas-chamber
there. They gassed mental defectives too.
WILDERMUTH: Yes, I know. I got to know that for a fact in the case of
NUREMBERG; my brother is doctor at an institution there. I’ve seen one
of those transports myself. The people knew where they were being
taken.
HEYDTE: Yes, and then they’ve also done it with old people.
WILDERMUTH: Not with old people!
HEYDTE: Homes for old people! Yes, that is so.


Document 120
CSDIC (UK), SR Report, SRGG 1093 (C) [TNA, WO 208/4169]
Generalleutnant SCHAEFER (Commander, 244 Infantry Division)–
Captured 28 Aug. 44 in Marseilles
Generalleutnant KITTEL (Commandant, Metz and Commander, 462
Volksgrenadier Division)–Captured 22 Nov. 44 in Metz.
Information received: 28 Dec. 44
SCHAEFER: After the stories you’ve told me one might think one was
really no longer bound to the FÜHRER.
KITTEL: We can’t think that.
SCHAEFER: I mean in our hearts; when one goes over all the crimes that
have been committed, it makes one’s hair stand on end.
KITTEL: 18,000 people were shot in ROSTOV, there are about 60,000
people in mass graves near LUBLIN.299
SCHAEFER: One can only say that if GERMANY is destroyed it is justice
and nothing else. It is a tragedy that so many millions of decent people
should be wiped out, and towns too, for the sake of men who are leading
a gangster existence–there’s no other way of describing it. I simply
cannot swallow it.
KITTEL: In UPPER SILESIA they simply slaughtered the people
systematically. They were gassed in a big hall.300
SCHAEFER: When was that done?
KITTEL: Up till the spring, then it was stopped.
SCHAEFER: Who are the people concerned?
KITTEL: I don’t know. There’s the greatest secrecy about all those things.


Document 92
CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 666 [TNA, WO 208/4167]
WILHELM RITTER VON THOMA–General der Panzertruppe–Captured 4
Nov. 42 in North Africa.
GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences
Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia.
Information received: 16 Dec. 43
THOMA: [. . .]
In the paper today there are details of the mass poisonings, that gas
business. I know it’s true, because the people who did it told me about it
themselves.
BASSENGE: I don’t know, but I presume it is . . . 100 per cent correct.
THOMA: Yes, I heard of it from a man who had to do it. It was SS men and
Gestapo youths who rounded up the Jews and so on, and as they had no
technical experts amongst their own numbers, chemists who were in the
gas department of the Ordnance Branch, had to work with them.235 One
man told me himself with horror that that time in RUSSIA was the most
appalling time of his life; I said I wouldn’t have done it.
THOMA: When I’ve got both the German and English news service I can
roughly sift out what’s true.
BASSENGE: Obviously everyone lies like a trooper in war-time and here
one has the opportunity of hearing both sides–
THOMA: We get a clearer picture than the Generals in command at the
front.
BASSENGE: We were never so well-informed as we are here.


Document 136
CSDIC (UK), GRGG 281
Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 8–9 Apr. 45
[TNA, WO 208/4177]
JÖSTING: A great friend of mine whom I can trust implicitly, an Austrian,
still in VIENNA, as far as I know, belong to ‘Luftflotte 4’, and was down
at ODESSA.346 When he arrived there some ‘Oberleutnant’ or
‘Hauptmann’ said to him: ‘Would you like to watch? An amusing show is
going on down there, umpteen Jews are being killed off.’ He answered:
‘Good Heavens, no.’ He had to pass the spot, however, and witnessed the
scene. He told me himself that the barn was bunged full of women and
children. Petrol was poured over them and they were burnt alive. He saw
it himself. He said: ‘You can’t imagine what their screams sound like. Is
such a thing right?’ I said: ‘No, it isn’t right. You can do whatever you
like with them, but not burn them alive or gas them or Heavens knows
what else! It’s not their fault. They should be imprisoned and after the
war has been won you can say: “This people must disappear. Put them in
a ship! Sail wherever you wish’, we don’t care where you land but there
is no room for you in Germany from now on!”’ We have made enemies
galore! We killed them everywhere in the east and as a result people
hardly believe the real KATYN347 story any longer, but say we did it
ourselves.
No, if I hadn’t several proofs of that sort of thing I wouldn’t
make such a noise about it, but in my opinion it was utterly
wrong! What madness was that onslaught on Jewish homes; I
happened still to be in VIENNA at the time, at BAD
VÖSLAU.348 We were then already short of glass and
everything else and then we go and smash all their windows!
Those people could easily have been turned out and we could
have said: ‘Well, this business is now taken over by a Christian,
Franz MEYER. They’ll be compensated, whether well or badly
makes no difference.’ But we were short of everything and still
everything was smashed and the houses set ablaze. I quite agree
the Jews had to be turned out, that was obvious, but the manner
in which it was done was absolutely wrong, and the present
hatred is the result. My father-in-law, who certainly couldn’t
stand Jews, always said: ‘That will not pass unpunished, say
what you like!’ I’d be the first to agree to getting rid of the Jews;
I’d show them the way–out of GERMANY! But why massacre
them? That can be done after the war, when we can say ‘We
have the power; we have the right; we have won the war; we can
afford to do it!’ But now! Look at the British Government–who
are they? The Jews. Who governs in AMERICA? The Jews.
While Bolshevism is Judaism in excelsis.


https://bitchute.com/video/7K7oVc6hHH6T/

Someone on this forum just linked to a vid that has David Irving talking about these transcripts as if they are authentic. I think this is why he believes the orthodox AR story.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 10 months ago (Mon Jul 13, 2020 5:26 pm)

gl0spana wrote:
Lamprecht wrote:Do you have anything more than unverifiable hearsay?

oh yeah

Then why did you post more unverifiable hearsay? Post the "secret recording" where the individual claims to have personally witnessed Jews being gassed.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

Otium

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Otium » 2 years 10 months ago (Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:50 pm)

gl0spana wrote:
Document 92 CSDIC (UK) SR REPORT, SRGG 666 [TNA, WO 208/4167] WILHELM RITTER VON THOMA–General der Panzertruppe–Captured 4
Nov. 42 in North Africa. GERHARD BASSENGE–Generalmajor (GOC, Air Defences Tunis/Bizerta)–Captured 9 May 43 in Tunisia. Information received: 16 Dec. 43

[...]

THOMA: When I’ve got both the German and English news service I can roughly sift out what’s true.

BASSENGE: Obviously everyone lies like a trooper in war-time and here one has the opportunity of hearing both sides–

THOMA: We get a clearer picture than the Generals in command at the front.

BASSENGE: We were never so well-informed as we are here.


He's literally talking about information the Allies gave to them. This isn't proof for anything, and if it is, it's the persuasive nature of Allied propaganda. As Lamprecht said, it's hearsay. Jews, the Polish Underground, Partisans all had stories about alleged gassings, none of which can be substantiated. Neither can the stories of these people.

gl0spana wrote:
Document 136 CSDIC (UK), GRGG 281 Report on information obtained from Senior Officers (PW) on 8–9 Apr. 45 [TNA, WO 208/4177]

JÖSTING: A great friend of mine whom I can trust implicitly, an Austrian, still in VIENNA, as far as I know, belong to ‘Luftflotte 4’, and was down at ODESSA.346 When he arrived there some ‘Oberleutnant’ or ‘Hauptmann’ said to him: ‘Would you like to watch? An amusing show is going on down there, umpteen Jews are being killed off.’ He answered: ‘Good Heavens, no.’ He had to pass the spot, however, and witnessed the scene. He told me himself that the barn was bunged full of women and children. Petrol was poured over them and they were burnt alive. He saw it himself. He said: ‘You can’t imagine what their screams sound like. Is such a thing right?’ I said: ‘No, it isn’t right. You can do whatever you like with them, but not burn them alive or gas them or Heavens knows what else! It’s not their fault. They should be imprisoned and after the war has been won you can say: “This people must disappear. Put them in a ship! Sail wherever you wish’, we don’t care where you land but there is no room for you in Germany from now on!”’ We have made enemies galore! We killed them everywhere in the east and as a result people hardly believe the real KATYN347 story any longer, but say we did it ourselves. No, if I hadn’t several proofs of that sort of thing I wouldn’t make such a noise about it, but in my opinion it was utterly wrong! What madness was that onslaught on Jewish homes; I happened still to be in VIENNA at the time, at BAD VÖSLAU.348 We were then already short of glass and everything else and then we go and smash all their windows! Those people could easily have been turned out and we could have said: ‘Well, this business is now taken over by a Christian,

Franz MEYER. They’ll be compensated, whether well or badly makes no difference.’ But we were short of everything and still everything was smashed and the houses set ablaze. I quite agree the Jews had to be turned out, that was obvious, but the manner in which it was done was absolutely wrong, and the present hatred is the result. My father-in-law, who certainly couldn’t stand Jews, always said: ‘That will not pass unpunished, say what you like!’ I’d be the first to agree to getting rid of the Jews; I’d show them the way–out of GERMANY! But why massacre
them? That can be done after the war, when we can say ‘We have the power; we have the right; we have won the war; we can afford to do it!’ But now! Look at the British Government–who are they? The Jews. Who governs in AMERICA? The Jews. While Bolshevism is Judaism in excelsis.


This one is more convincing but still based on hearsay. This person he was talking to made no mention of gassing, but burning. Even then it's just hearsay from this guy, if he were to be interrogated about this matter more probably could've been found out, like a location of the barn/bodies etc. If not, it's just another story from a captured German which may or may not be based on fact. Perhaps some Germans brutalized some Jewish partisans, that's the most likely outcome. Surely such a thing is cruel, if true, but such is war. Especially in the East where there were no rules to govern the warfare. What you can see is that they were no less anti-semitic.

"Historians" and Jews like to pretend that just because some Jews might've suffered some indigities that the National Socialists thereby were 'wrong' about Jews. Which is nonsense.

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 10 months ago (Mon Jul 13, 2020 8:53 pm)

gl0spana wrote:incriminating

If burning people alive is incriminating, then would you argue that the firebombing of German cities was a war crime? Women, children, babies, old people, etc - burned alive for simply living in a German city. Or are certain groups (like the victors of a war) somehow above the law? If that is the case, any action taken by Germans in an area under their control was legal; unless the soldiers violated these laws on their own accord. This is a completely separate issue from the "Holocaust" anyway, which is alleged to be a state-sponsored, state-planned, systematic policy of exterminating Jews. Atrocities committed at random during a war do not fit under this label.

Also, for something to be "incriminating" a crime must have been committed. Reprisals for partisan/terrorist attacks were not described in the criminal codes / international treaties until Article 2 Section 3 of the Geneva Agreement of 27 September 1929, signed by Germany but not the USSR. As the USSR certainly did not abide by this agreement, the Germans were not bound by it in their war against them. And this act prohibited reprisals against POWs, not civilians. It was not until 12 August 1949 that a general prohibition of reprisals against civilians was issued; by the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Article 33 states:
"Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited."

Ex post facto laws are explicitly forbidden by the US constitution. That means if an action was not illegal when it occurred, but that action was later criminalized, you can't be punished for it (or rather, it is not legally legitimate to do so). Even in the post-WWII occupied German state, the German Basic Law signed 8 May 1949, Article 103 stipulates that an act is only punishable if it was legislatively prohibited at the point in time in which the action took place.

Robert A. Taft (US Senator from Ohio) criticized the Nuremberg show trials for this very reason. As did US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who stated:
"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time."

They certainly were not alone either.

Sorry gl0spana, but just because you think something that allegedly happened during the bloodiest war in human history wasn't nice does not make it "Incriminating" - post the text of the alleged criminal code that was in force at this period which states that such actions were illegal and that the Germans were bound by it. And was this alleged atrocity committed based on an order from higher up, or "at random" by the soldiers in the area? What was the motive? Was it just random, or in response to something else? These are all important questions that need to be answered for us to determine if something is "Incriminating" - and we have not even established that it indeed took place, it's still just [a translation of a supposed "secret recording" of] hearsay.
Last edited by Lamprecht on Mon Jul 13, 2020 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Lamprecht » 2 years 10 months ago (Mon Jul 13, 2020 9:14 pm)

HMSendeavour wrote: if he were to be interrogated about this matter more probably could've been found out, like a location of the barn/bodies etc. If not, it's just another story from a captured German which may or may not be based on fact. Perhaps some Germans brutalized some Jewish partisans, that's the most likely outcome.

From what I read, it says that the alleged burning-alive of Jews took place in Odessa, which today is a Ukrainian port city on the Black Sea. What we are reading here is an alleged English translation of a supposed secret recording (which has not been provided) of one German telling a story to a second German; a story the first German claims was told to him by a third German who, according to the first, also claims to have witnessed it personally .... although this third German turned down the offer to watch, he ended up passing by and seeing it anyway.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

Otium

Re: "Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations, 1942-45" revisionist

Postby Otium » 2 years 10 months ago (Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:12 am)

Lamprecht wrote:
HMSendeavour wrote: if he were to be interrogated about this matter more probably could've been found out, like a location of the barn/bodies etc. If not, it's just another story from a captured German which may or may not be based on fact. Perhaps some Germans brutalized some Jewish partisans, that's the most likely outcome.

From what I read, it says that the alleged burning-alive of Jews took place in Odessa, which today is a Ukrainian port city on the Black Sea. What we are reading here is an alleged English translation of a supposed secret recording (which has not been provided) of one German telling a story to a second German; a story the first German claims was told to him by a third German who, according to the first, also claims to have witnessed it personally .... although this third German turned down the offer to watch, he ended up passing by and seeing it anyway.


Regarding this, I have come across something, not sure if it's the same incident, but it piqued my interests regarding this matter of a barn:

Around 40–50 Jewish men were forced to demolish a statue of Lenin in a nearby square and carry part of the statue on a wooden stretcher to the market square, then to a nearby barn,[1] while singing communist songs. The local rabbi, Awigdor Białostocki, and the kosher butcher, Mendel Nornberg, led the procession.[28] According to an eyewitness, Szmuel Wasersztajn, the group was taken to the barn, where they were made to dig a pit and throw the statue in. They were then killed and buried in the same pit.[33] Polish government investigators found this grave during a partial exhumation in 2001. It held the remains of about 40 men, a kosher butcher's knife, and the head of the concrete Lenin statue.[34]

Most of Jedwabne's remaining Jews, around 300 men, women, children and infants, were then locked inside the barn, which was set on fire, probably using kerosene from former Soviet supplies.[1] This group was buried in the barn near the first group. The 2001 exhumation found a mass grave within the barn's foundations and another close to the foundations.[35]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedwabne_pogrom#Jedwabne_pogrom


This was an act actually committed by the Poles, not the Germans, but was blamed on the latter, as you might expect. There was a controversy about this in Poland.

From a study:

Abstract

On 10 July 1941,Jewish inhabitants of the little town of Jedwabne were burnt alive in a barn by their Polish neighbors. This was probably the worst act of violence inflicted on Jews by the Poles during World War II. By examining postwar legal proceedings related to the Jedwabne massacre, this article looks at the attitude of Polish authorities towards crimes committed by the Poles on Jews during the war as well as the reaction of the local community to its own dark past. Although a group of perpetrators were put on trial in 1949 and 1953, criminal court files reveal the indolence and ineffectiveness of Communist Poland’s justice in such cases. The documents also expose a conspiracy of silence among residents of Jedwabne and their solidarity with the defendants. On the other hand, a scrutiny of civil court proceedings discloses mechanisms of appropriation of the victims’ property by the perpetrators. An analysis of a subsequent investigation into the Jedwabne case carried out in the 1960s and 1970s proves that it predominantly aimed at erasing the truth about Polish involvement in the crime, and as its result German gendarmes were officially pointed out as the sole culprits. Only after the restitution of democracy in 1989 was Poland able to openly confront black pages of its history including the Jedwabne massacre.

Read the full paper: https://sci-hub.tw/10.1177/0888325411398915


If there is actual proof of this that they claimed to have uncovered in 2001, it seems to be more proof of a Polish Holocaust against the Jews rather than the Germans.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests