New here - question regarding selection for deportation

[flimflam]

I also asked, and you ignored or don't understand: " What are the primary sources?"
Must I explain?

You don't need to explain, I've seen it 1000 times, it a standard technique used by Zionists on sites they dominate, usually with a question like "Where did they all go?". You ask a question that you know the person asked doesn't have an answer for that will satisfy you, and when they answer you ignore the answer, and ask again. It's bullying. I've seen you do it repeatedly. You end up trying to humiliate newbies to the site. It is counterproductive.

[borjastick]

The question of who and when and how they were selected for deportation is perhaps an interesting detail but it could also be used by someone who wishes to deflect from the real issues of the day.

Whether a certain jew or bunch of jews were or were not selected isn't that important and certainly doesn't prove that deportation was a euphemism for extermination.

The holocaust claims are always stymied when one asks for real evidence, in other words bodies, remains of the claimed one million here, 800,000 there, proof of gas chambers and materials required to cremate them and ovens in which to do so.

As someone said recently the jews and zionist proponents of the holocaust claims say they don't need evidence they have witnesses who were there and saw it all happen before their very eyes. Except the witnesses are the weakest link in an already very weak chain.

[Hannover]

I also asked, and you ignored or don't understand: " What are the primary sources?"
Must I explain?

You don't need to explain, I've seen it 1000 times, it a standard technique used by Zionists on sites they dominate, usually with a question like "Where did they all go?". You ask a question that you know the person asked doesn't have an answer for that will satisfy you, and when they answer you ignore the answer, and ask again. It's bullying. I've seen you do it repeatedly. You end up trying to humiliate newbies to the site. It is counterproductive.

So then, you do not know what primary sources are.
Try this:
https://library.ithaca.edu/sp/subjects/primary

Odd that you think asking critical questions is "bullying".
Well, this is a debate forum, not an 'everyone gets a trophy', hand holding summer camp.

"I've seen you do it repeatedly."
You have not.

I note that you are off topic to the OP in this thread. I'm guessing intentional. Please address the topic of this thread.

Cheers, Hannover

So called "holocaust eyewitnesses" making absurd, impossible, and contradictory claims is not the exception, but the rule.

[Hektor]

...
For Christ's sake, give the guy a break. I see this tactic all the time when debating Zionists, they ask a question and then demand over and over that you answer it. If someone, especially a newbie, doesn't answer a question then leave it alone. Instead codoh starts with aggressive questions, quoting guidelines, and bullying. I've seen it before. This guy is not Robert Muelenkamp.

Then it's "for Causts sake".
There is a difference between asking questions for clarification or using them for the purpose of obfuscation, which is the tactic you are referring, to.
A newbie should also be familiarized with the guidelines. That isn't bullying. There are good reasons for those guidelines.