Well, the obvious answer is BOTH cases of circumstantial evidence work against the Soviet version. Both the door opening to the washroom and the plumbing fixtures should have clued the Soviets to the dimensions of the original chamber they were allegedly restoring.
What is most obvious about revisionism is the fact that these questions are very valid and very relevant to finding out the truth about this building. Revisionism gains strength by showing how standard story defenders refuse to acknowledge these obvious cases of evidence.
One can only wonder what a legitimate cross examination of all those involved in this chamber would have revealed?
It would be interesting to see just exactly how deep into the floor concrete Turpitz's scraped-out wall screeds go?
It would also be interesting to see if the concrete floor surface under the Zyklon chutes was ever altered? If not, then there's no excuse for the lack of heavy cyanide residue traces there.
Auschwitz I chimney on Holocaust Memorial Day
Moderator: Moderator
Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
A statement made in Cole's movie by his tour guide, Alica, has always intrigued me.
Alicia's discomfort at seeing the marks left by the walls is obvious.
When I first heard her say this I thought - poor girl - we can all see where the walls were.
But what she said was - When I was shown a picture of the gas chamber - it was only one room.
If we give Alica the benefit of the doubt then there must be a picture in the museum archives, shown to the tour guides, that shows this room as one room. It's hard to get my head around what that picture would show if it was only one room. The room would need to be a lot smaller.
Cole: I then asked Alicia if any walls had been knocked down in the room exhibited as the gas chamber.
Cole: So this part was all the gas chamber.
Alicia: Yes.
Cole: Were there walls here at one time?
Alicia: But here... here... it was only one room... only one room... thats here. I.. I know here.. when here I show a picture of gas chamber, it was only one room.
Cole: So were there ever walls here?
Alicia: No.
Alicia's discomfort at seeing the marks left by the walls is obvious.
When I first heard her say this I thought - poor girl - we can all see where the walls were.
But what she said was - When I was shown a picture of the gas chamber - it was only one room.
If we give Alica the benefit of the doubt then there must be a picture in the museum archives, shown to the tour guides, that shows this room as one room. It's hard to get my head around what that picture would show if it was only one room. The room would need to be a lot smaller.
There was no holocaust.
Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
If you look at all other alleged gas chambers of the period, like those at the Reinhart camps, you will see they all had gas-tight doors. It would be unreasonable to suggest that the Auschwitz I gas chamber did not when all other examples did. Therefore it is reasonable to assume the washroom wall would most likely have had a gas-tight door in it if the Auschwitz I morgue was a gas chamber. Any other type of door would not have worked.
So the only argument believers would be left with was that the washroom wall had a gas-tight door at the time of the gas chamber that was then removed and replaced with a regular room door upon the bomb shelter conversion. However, this doesn't make sense since the blueprint shows the door opening to be no wider than any other door opening in Auschwitz I that is already known to have a regular room door. Also, this opening was smaller than known gas-tight doors in the German inventory.
Could it be that the Soviets knocked down the washroom wall because it had a normal door in it that would have exposed it not being a gas chamber?
So the only argument believers would be left with was that the washroom wall had a gas-tight door at the time of the gas chamber that was then removed and replaced with a regular room door upon the bomb shelter conversion. However, this doesn't make sense since the blueprint shows the door opening to be no wider than any other door opening in Auschwitz I that is already known to have a regular room door. Also, this opening was smaller than known gas-tight doors in the German inventory.
Could it be that the Soviets knocked down the washroom wall because it had a normal door in it that would have exposed it not being a gas chamber?
Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bombsaway and 11 guests
