Myles Power shooting his mouth off

[Fred zz]

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dwErdLy7J0

[Otium]

I'm not interested in listening to this man spin his yarn, perhaps someone can add context/clarify. It seems to be mostly clips from an interview with Rizoli and Germar.

Still waiting for Myles to put out the video where he 'refutes' Germar using the same old hackneyed sources Germar has already refuted, e.g. Green et. al.

As per the rules. You really should add comments of your own to explain why anyone should care about this, and even ask questions. Not just link to a video under the assumption people will dig into it.

[Fred zz]

I put it out there as a public service to others who may be interested of what is going on.
You may not want to see it, but others may.
or are you the only one that comes to this site.
You should really mind your own beez wax.

[borjastick]

I put it out there as a public service to others who may be interested of what is going on.
You may not want to see it, but others may.
or are you the only one that comes to this site.
You should really mind your own beez wax.

Oh dear. Please stop the arrogance. Rules is rules mate.

[Otium]

I put it out there as a public service to others who may be interested of what is going on.
You may not want to see it, but others may.
or are you the only one that comes to this site.

I never suggested it was a personal afront because I didn't want to see it, as if I thought you needed to tailor the post to me. I simply stressed that you need to follow the rules and say more about what it is you're posting to generate interest and discussion. Otherwise, in my opinion, there's no point in posting it here at all.

You should really mind your own beez wax.

You just made the point that the post isn't tailored to anyone in particular, so telling me to mind my own 'beez wax' doesn't make any sense. Also, you're posting on a public forum, which makes it everyone's beeswax.

[Fred zz]

[Fred, please review the rules:

If you post a quote, a link from or to a book, a news article, magazine story, a photo / image, film / movie, another website, etc., you must also comment on the quote or the link content. Tell the forum what you find wrong, compelling, unique, or important about the reference content. Flippant, overly brief comments are not acceptable. We want commentary and discussion.

Web.]

[greatmystery]

Miles still hasn't refuted Chemistry of Auschwitz which makes it clear that he can not.

[Fred zz]

To whom who used my name to set me straight try not sweating the small stuff,
If you cannot resist sweating the small stuff, I suggest you and Otium seek counseling. Is this all you have to worry about in life?
See my posting history, good or bad I provided plenty of commentary and discussion.
If this posting is giving you convulsions, delete already

[Otium]

To whom who used my name to set me straight try not sweating the small stuff,
If you cannot resist sweating the small stuff, I suggest you and Otium seek counseling. Is this all you have to worry about in life?
See my posting history, good or bad I provided plenty of commentary and discussion.
If this posting is giving you convulsions, delete already

Nobody is having 'convulsions' or 'sweating the small stuff'. As to whether it's 'small' or not isn't the point.

You have to follow the rules on every post, that's it. No more, no less, no exceptions; it doesn't matter if you followed the rules in other posts.

You must contribute to the conversation with what you post, it's not that hard, nobody is being unreasonable by asking you to do this. You cannot just post a link and say nothing, otherwise the forum would become no more than a platform to spam nonsense.

[Webmaster]

Posters:
This thread is about Myles Power's video.
This thread isn't about Fred's lack of comments in his first post, which has already been addressed.
Continued discussion of Fred's lack of comments will be interpreted as an off-topic derailment.
Use the PM function to discuss personal grievances of that nature.

Web.

[Archie]

Myles continues to dodge. He did a whole video on Germar’s Speedos. Now he’s going back to Leuchter, talking about authorship. Germar says Faurisson told him he was the real author of the Leuchter Report, and Myles already harped on this his last video. If true, sure, that doesn’t look great, but ultimately it doesn’t change the chemical composition of the walls at Auschwitz.

Myles needs to get to the point already. He’s been talking about this for a couple of years and hasn’t even got around to regurgitating Greene yet.

[greatmystery]

Myles continues to dodge. He did a whole video on Germar’s Speedos. Now he’s going back to Leuchter, talking about authorship. Germar says Faurisson told him he was the real author of the Leuchter Report, and Myles already harped on this his last video. If true, sure, that doesn’t look great, but ultimately it doesn’t change the chemical composition of the walls at Auschwitz.

Myles needs to get to the point already. He’s been talking about this for a couple of years and hasn’t even got around to regurgitating Greene yet.

Mike from TRS did a small response to Myles' video. Basically saying the same thing. Myles keeps attacking the people and not the ideas. And his reddit fanbase are too stupid to know the difference.

https://t.me/mpeinovich/2167

[fireofice]

He's wrong about the explosive nature of Zyklon. He's not taking into account the amount of Zyklon it would take to kill a bunch of people in a short time, which obviously is not the purpose Zyklon was made for.

viewtopic.php?t=10422

[Otium]

Myles' strategy is pretty clear.

He relies on character assassination, preconcieved bias, and 'ethical' purity spiralling despite the results yielded. For example, he complains that samples were taken by revisionists without the 'permission' of the Auschwitz curators, and that revisionists didn't inform the people testing the samples sent to them about where they came from so they could do some magic work on the results. Basically an attempt to morally impugn revisionists as being dishonest and even careless, in an attempt to discredit them. He doesn't explain how any of this would nullify the actual scientific results, or impact them in any way. Other than, of course, not giving the system the chance to catch them first. That's his real gripe.

I think Myles will still come out with another Germar video. I think it'll be some 45 minute to an hour long filibuster to save face. He's already put himself in the position where he's promised it, and he already had his chance to simply walk away without any noise when he was challenged 2 or so years ago by Mike and the TRS crew. Clearly Myles is too pig-headded not to respond in some form. It eats away at him. Particularly because conceding by way of silence to 'Neo-Nazis' is particularly humiliating.

The video he will put out will convince all the people who were already convinced, and just irritate the people who know his game and how he will distort things, even in their most simple framing. If the guy was an 'honest' scientifically minded stooge, he would only engage with the scientific claims and comprehensivly refute without any filler, all of the possibilities. But he can't.

His video will be a hodge podge of cheap snipes and regurgitations of other failed refutations of Germar and Leuchter.

But still, over time the video will be refuted, and he knows it. The difference is that the refutations will be on this forum and/or podcasts like TDS. It'll be on platforms and in content that Myles' audience won't see, which i'd bet is what's most important to him. But then again, he didn't even need to do any of this in the first place. One can only think he did because he was naive and ignorant of the Holocaust narrative beyond its surface level before this, and now, being the egomaniac he is, cannot turn away with anything less than a hollow victory granted to him by his audience, and above all having the last word. Even though it'll be acheived through dishonest means and not by facts.

---

Myles should be confronted with the examples (which escape me right now) of other alleged gas chambers that contain Prussian blue staining, despite his claim that not enough cyanide was ever used to produce such staining when gassing humans.

[Butterfangers]

Germar says Faurisson told him he was the real author of the Leuchter Report, and Myles already harped on this his last video. If true, sure, that doesn’t look great, but ultimately it doesn’t change the chemical composition of the walls at Auschwitz.

It doesn't look great but Myles, of course, frames it as being more 'sinister' than it actually is. The report may have been written by Faurisson but keep in mind what it was used for: it was to defend a man who was on trial for "hate speech", a preposterous and unjust law which should not exist. It is not unethical, in my opinion, to use any means necessary to acquit him of these charges or to reduce the outrageous penalty. Besides that, I do not think anyone has disputed that Leuchter actually traveled to Auschwitz-Birkenau and took samples, examined the 'chambers' himself, etc. Subsequently, Faurisson wrote the report (perhaps Leuchter commissioned him as a ghostwriter or ghost-co-author, who knows), then Leuchter put his name on it and Faurisson ceded credit for the work to him. Leuchter---an execution technology expert---"signed off" on the report, gave it his approval as-was... surely, he had a chance to edit it, make changes, etc. Thus, he played a significant part in the content of the report and its analysis. With this in mind, who knows how much Leuchter actually contributed to it, overall. Faurisson may have spoken in general terms when he informed Germar that he (Faurisson) had written it. Germar's point was that it made sense to him that Faurisson had written [at least some of] it, given there were major technical errors at certain points which no one with technical knowledge would have made.

Who knows what Leuchter's motives were, throughout the years. It's now pretty universally agreed that he is a self-promoting, scheming con-man and a liar. People who live this way tend to get by under the radar for most people up to a certain point. Jim Rizoli (and his following) found out the hard way, after getting scammed. Surely, if Rizoli prioritized Jew-hatred in his life, he would have swept this Leuchter gaffe under the rug... instead, he's been open and direct in calling out Leuchter for the slimy gremlin that he is.