NFrNJ wrote:this comment also suggests you do not understand how archaeologists work. Why are you surprised he told you this? (why do you say "admitted" - he was not accused of anything. that is prejudicial language, suggestive of your distrust, not of his ill doing.)
Are you
seriously suggesting that you KNOW archaeologists take bones from other sites and chuck them all into one pit? And this is how they "work"? Are you seriously saying that you KNEW this was done by looking looking at the pictures?
NFrNJ wrote:You took a slide out of context, not knowing what it showed. He told you what it showed, because you were saying things that you had just made up about it, and not telling the truth. He corrected you, told you the truth. A truth he has not (as far as you can prove) concealed. He has not(to my knowledge, and you have not shown that he has) ever lied about it.
And what exactly was the "context"? And how did Lamprecht take it "out" of that context? How would this manipulation of physical evidence look any better with whatever "context" accompanies it according to you? Since you apparently know something about the context that we do not. Are you presuming the slide "showed" that the bones had been taken from around the camp and thrown into one pit to make it look larger? Whether this was admitted in an email or in a slide show presentation doesn't change the fact that such a practise is unorthodox and disreputable. Or perhaps archeologists are always accompanied by Rabbis who tell them how to do their job, and where to place archaeological artefacts? I hardly see how Lamprecht took anything "out of context" or how any kind of "context" could make this look any less dishonest on part of these Holocaust hucksters.
NFrNJ wrote:So if anyone is making an admission here it is you - admitting you used it out of context, assumed untrue things, probably spread misinformation without telling people you had no idea what the photo actually showed, and that it was you that was not doing due diligence and proper research.
Pretending that he was telling lies when it was just you assuming things is a pretty poor show.
What "untrue things" did Lamprecht assume? And about what did he assume? Your entire post was about Lamprecht "assuming" the motives, or actions of the researchers - not anything about the evidence itself.
If as you say NFrNJ that what the photo showed was exactly what you'd expect the "context" of the researchers to explain
(that the bones in the photo were from multiple excavations moved into one pit), then all it showed was what Lamprecht later confirmed by posting the email response of the researchers. He did in fact do his "due diligence" and engage in proper research posting what the researchers had to say about what the photo showed, thus never spreading misinformation about the photo itself, or what the researchers claimed the photo showed. He told us exactly what they said, and criticized their dubious work ethic in having manipulated the physical evidence to make a mass grave look larger than it was in reality.
Your claim that Lamprecht was spreading misinformation, or "assuming" anything, is a baseless lie or genuine misunderstanding.
