May Conference in Estonia: The Future of the West and Europe

[Merlin300]

A chance to argue for Open Debate on the Holocaust and the importance of honest history for the future.


An important conference in Tallinn, Estonia, on the weekend of May 13-14, will bring together writers, thinkers and activists
from Europe and America

https://guidingthestorm.com/2023-spring-conference

[Hektor]

Indeed one could bring up the malicious suppression of freedom of speech and freedom of enquiry. As well as the persecution of revisionists.
Lot's of people realize that Holocausting is a damaging feature of the post-WW2 world, but they are afraid to take a stance on it. It's because the whole affair has achieved the status official religion had in past ages. Whoever denies the Holocaust or dares to make jokes about the ridiculous stories told in its name is seen as highly impious, if not being enleagued with Satan himself.

Some people laughed, when I told them that 'The Holocaust' is the present, transcendent religion of the West. And that those that dispute it, will be treated like heretics, witches, pagans of past ages. In fact they are treated like the early Christians first by the Jews and later by the Romans and other non-Jews of the Roman empire.

Those people will point to the majority being either professing Christians of various denominations or simply being Agnostics/Atheists. The majority is indeed rather secular... Not spending much attention on thinking about anything metaphysical. Their private lives, job, income, investments and pleasures are far more important to them. But this wasn't different with religions of the past ages neither. It was however always a subtext to interpret the world. For the Occident Christianity (in the broad sense) was that world interpretation system for at least a thousand years prior to the Nuremberg Trials. It was already in decline prior to this of course.... with secular philosophies becoming competing world interpretation systems. The first breakthrough of this was the 'French Revolution', with its cult of reason. The Revolutionaries were still an extreme group then. The majority of French was still deep-rooted in Catholicism, especially outside Paris and the countryside. France was however heavily centralized under Absolutism. So what happened in Paris had far bigger influence than before. The creeds of the French Revolution were except "Reason" (and that in the most irrational way) Liberalism, Egalitarianism and a proto-type of Socialism. It came as a shock to the occident, due to the cruelties being committed during the French Revolution during public spectacles. The nobility and clergy were marginalized and the wealthier, educated people from the Middle Class became the new elites in France. The Mayhem followed a restorative and romantic response afterwards. But the course of the occident was 'progressive' from thereon and it seemed to be affirmed by industrialization, technology, science... which indeed improved the living standards of the broad mass of people over time. This however ignores how this was even possible. Meaning what the cultural foundations for the possibility of industrial enterprises actually were and they are deeply rooted in Christian Philosophy, which again is based on classical philosophy and Christian Cosmology developed during the medieval era. This is what made
a) Science
b) Social Order with minimized violence
c) Technical Developments (mechanical arts)
possible and strengthened those societies far above any other society present during the modern era.

The progressists spend tremendous efforts to deny this, of course. In their version the previous philosophy and ideas had to be overcome by thinkers that were actually Atheists and Materialists and where oppressed by the Church and it's overcome ideas of morality. Well, Atheism and Materialism can't account for the precepts necessary to develop the 'scientific method'. Neither can they account for a workable social order. Any organization works on the principles of hierarchy and that there is the material and non-material world. The minimum of this is acknowledging meaningful information and that there are difference between 'good' and 'bad' information as well.

And in fact that while more and better products entered the markets and cities and the wealth of people was growing into the 20th century. Those societies didn't go without major crisis and contradiction. Various political models were developed and they were also competing with each other. WW1 did collapse several monarchies, in fact those that were traditional in Russia, Austro-Hungary, Germany. Most of those did turn into 'Republics' some were communistic others were more liberal in their approach. With Germany being a bit in-between (welfare state). Germany was the most crisis ridden country in the 1920s leading to the rise of the NSDAP. Which lead to Hitler becoming "Leader and Reichskanzler" restoring peace and prosperity for a period of time. That did not sit well, with the groups that did lose their ill-gotten privileges during that time of course. And that why there was lots of bad-mouthing of the 'New Germany' in the international media as well. The 'Nazi'-slur was omnipresent then. People mistakingly believing that this was the name of Hitler's party or movement. It isn't there is just some slight similarity between naming, there. The actual reason for the popularity may have been a bit more sinister. I link it to terms like Nazir and Nazarene, which are names for Christ and Christians. Not that the NSDAP was *explicitly* Christian. But Germany was a traditionally Christian country with the large denominations being well represented there. Both the Protestant and the Catholic clergy did also approve of National Socialism, critiquing minor details of it. The IMT Nuremberg part one ended with 12 death sentences and 10 executions. And it was, despite lots of critique against the trial and verdicts, assumed by many of having proven "The Holocaust" and/or "German guilt of World War Two". That notion was than hammered into the brains of gullible grown ups and school kids ever after. And with this in mind, even a new theology was designed. "Auschwitz is the Refutation of Christ". Six Million Jews replaced Jesus Christ. Gas Chambers replaced the Cross. Crematoria replaced the empty grave. The Holocaust is the Ne Civic Religion. Anyone that is the target for destruction is 'the New Hitler'. True Faith in the Holocaust is an entry requirement to become part of the 'new elite'. And that is how those elites and with them the societies they lord it over are controlled in a rather crafty fashion (social psychology). Controlled for their own demise it seems. And the steps there are decreasing the birth rates (campaigning for feminism, homosexuality and abortion) as well as massive third world immigration. How is that justified? Well didn't Hitler adore the family, motherhood, heterosexuality and ban abortion? Wasn't he 'a racist'? So the whole campaign did have some sinister subtext there. It is the cult around Hitler2.0. which got 'the Holocaust' as its mystery. That is why they can't simply leave it. They'd lose social control, they'd lose their positions and privileges over time and well, they may be tried for their crimes they can cover up right now... As well. It would of course be extremely funny, if those gays and girls would be tried in Nuremberg at some stage. Won't repair the damage, but pretty much stop or at least impair the damaging influence of the Cults around the Holocaust for good.

I wonder if they'd bring this up at the conference. But I think for starters demand the dismantling of any Holocaust Enforcement Laws.