TIK discusses Eric Hunt Videos on Treblinka and Majdanek

[Pia Kahn]

History youtuber TIK with 223 thousand followers is heating up on holocaust revisionism. In his recent video, he discusses two videos by Eric Hunt.

The video is extremely long, almost two hours. I am sure he is going to trash holocaust revisionism, but he is seriously starting to study the issue. He even posted links to the old Eric Hunt videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VKI6K5zX6o

[Pia Kahn]

I have watched the whole thing. TIK discusses Hunt's videos on Majdanek and Treblinka. TIK concedes a whole lot of things.

Then, TIK actually dug up in a wayback machine Eric Hunt's post, in which Hunt explained why he left holocaust revisionism. TIK's refutation of Hunt's videos on Majdanek and Treblinka consists of reading from this post. TIK is merely scratching the surface, but it's a start.

So TIK appears to be researching the topic. He has found the holocaustcontroversies web site and briefly mentions them, but he doesn't appear to be terribly enthusiastic about them.

I think this is a very interesting development. TIK has a huge following on youtube. TIK states that he wants an open debate on the issue. Great!

I don't think TIK will change sides and become a revisionist, his mind is closed on WW2.

But, TIK doesn't have to flip sides. If TIK starts posting videos, in which he tries to refute holocaust revisionism then I think many people will get interested and start researching the subject on their own.

[Merlin300]

I have watched the whole thing. TIK discusses Hunt's videos on Majdanek and Treblinka. TIK concedes a whole lot of things.

Then, TIK actually dug up in a wayback machine Eric Hunt's post, in which Hunt explained why he left holocaust revisionism. TIK's refutation of Hunt's videos on Majdanek and Treblinka consists of reading from this post. TIK is merely scratching the surface, but it's a start.

So TIK appears to be researching the topic. He has found the holocaustcontroversies web site and briefly mentions them, but he doesn't appear to be terribly enthusiastic about them.

I think this is a very interesting development. TIK has a huge following on youtube. TIK states that he wants an open debate on the issue. Great!

I don't think TIK will change sides and become a revisionist, his mind is closed on WW2.

But, TIK doesn't have to flip sides. If TIK starts posting videos, in which he tries to refute holocaust revisionism then I think many people will get interested and start researching the subject on their own.

Correct, the Holocaust Tale is so full of holes that any scrutiny should raise questions in an open mind.
The baseline for Holocaust "history" is, as Bradley Smith wrote,"...much of that history that we are taught today has been influenced by Soviet, British and American wartime propaganda which exaggerated and exploited real tragedies for propaganda purposes. This concerns not just Jews but Slavs, Roma, Jehovah’s Witnesses and, in some versions, Gays. It can be argued that there is considerable research that supports this point of view."

Thank you for pointing out the TIK youtube program.

[Fred zz]

At 13:57 if the video Hunt is correct, it was added on. The Majdanek state museum has a "Then and Now" photo showing that structure was not there on their own wall. The drawing just before is B42 next door, not B41. I have 2 different photos of an entrance structure on B42. And as you go into the structure, registration is on your left. Hunt did not show this structure in his Majdanek video.
Yesterday I read on the Majdanek website that it was not there.

[borjastick]

At 2 hours long I can't be bothered and neither will many others. If you cannot summarise your position and make a point in under 20 minutes then youtube isn't the place for you.

[Pia Kahn]

"At 2 hours long I can't be bothered and neither will many others..."

The video has got 31 thousands views within two days. TIK has tuned down his language somehwat in relation to holocaust unbelievers. He used to call them habitually NAZIs, cranks,... he even spotted the discussion between Hunt and Fritz Berg. So he has definitely been shaken.

[borjastick]

"At 2 hours long I can't be bothered and neither will many others..."

The video has got 31 thousands views within two days. TIK has tuned down his language somehwat in relation to holocaust unbelievers. He used to call them habitually NAZIs, cranks,... he even spotted the discussion between Hunt and Fritz Berg. So he has definitely been shaken.

31,000 views doesn't mean they have sat through all two hours of it. A view doesn't mean the viewer has watched all of it or anything like the whole duration.

[Pia Kahn]

"31,000 views doesn't mean they have sat through all two hours of it. A view doesn't mean the viewer has watched all of it or anything like the whole duration."

The video has 1400 comments.

TIK has a huge following and most of his videos have this epic length. Thus, the rule of thumb, more than 20 minutes is no good, doesn't seem to apply to him.

TIK has a very strong ideological bias, which he uses to look at history. Liberals are good, Leftists are bad and Nazis were leftists and evil to the core. The heroes are GB and the USA. He may slightly deviate from this overall view, but that's him. Therefore, it is quite astonishing that he actually started to research the topic and made a video.

[Werd]

TIK screwed up badly on Irving as I, but mostly others, have shown.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13968

[Mortimer]

Jim Rizoli and Fred Leuchter discussed this situation last year. Leuchter came to the conclusion that Hunt acted the way he did because of 3 possible scenarios.
1. He received death threats and changed his mind publicly because he feared for his life.

2. He was paid off. In other words he received a large sum of money to stop his revisionist research and condemn what he had already produced.

3, The way he is behaving is due to mental health issues.

Eric Hunt Turns His Back on the Truth
https://codoh.com/library/document/ryan ... ussion/en/

[borjastick]

Jim Rizoli and Fred Leuchter discussed this situation last year. Leuchter came to the conclusion that Hunt acted the way he did because of 3 possible scenarios.
1. He received death threats and changed his mind publicly because he feared for his life.

2. He was paid off. In other words he received a large sum of money to stop his revisionist research and condemn what he had already produced.

3, The way he is behaving is due to mental health issues.

Eric Hunt Turns His Back on the Truth
https://codoh.com/library/document/ryan ... ussion/en/

Or all three.

[EtienneSC]

Or all three.

That was not Germar Rudolf's impression in the recent talk transcribed by Katana:
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14119
The script has disappeared, but it may be available on BitChute if you are in a non-censored country or use VPN.
Basically, Rudolf thought Eric Hunt had personal issues and needed a change of direction in life and that this had provoked his strangely sudden change of heart. There is plenty of previous discussion on this forum here and if you search under the heading "Eric Hunt recants".
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10950

[Revision]

A big reason why he wanted to distant himself from us was also this:

A key flaw is the intertwining of “Holocaust Denial” with other “Conspiracy theories”, some often quite absurd.

[borjastick]

A big reason why he wanted to distant himself from us was also this:

A key flaw is the intertwining of “Holocaust Denial” with other “Conspiracy theories”, some often quite absurd.

It's a fair point. In discussions with some people over the years they have stated that I must be one of those conspiracy lovers who believe that JFK was killed by some secret organisation, that man never landed on the moon and Bigfoot is real...

These things are mutually exclusive and they should not be used as a stick to beat us with. It's just a way of creating doubt and making us less credible.

Notice how nearly all climate change loons always bring ocean plastic waste into their argument from an early stage. Similar position to that above.

Just because we have inquisitive minds and question things doesn't make anything we question laughable.

[Pia Kahn]

A big reason why he wanted to distant himself from us was also this:

A key flaw is the intertwining of “Holocaust Denial” with other “Conspiracy theories”, some often quite absurd.

But, you can distance yourself from "us" - whoever he means - without giving up your convictions, right?

Conspiracy theorist is just a slur used to defame a person. Anyone who deviates from the mainstream is called conspiracy theorist. 9/11, JFK, Moon landing, Corona virus,... you name it.

If you are afraid of that then you might as well take off your brain and hand it over to the mainstream for brainwashing.