Steven Spielberg says sand at Auschwitz is really bones of Jews !!!

[Hannover]

CODOH Forum participant Hieldner gets credit for this find*, I thought it deserved it's own thread.

Steven Spielberg says the sand at Auschwitz-Birkenau is really the bones of Jews. I kid you not.

No doubt jaws are dropping everywhere.

see:
https://vid.me/HZs7

- Hannover

* taken from:
'evidence destroyed, but then evidence not destroyed / a classic from H-Industry spokesman 'Nessie''
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10596

Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the laughable 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

[diaz52]

Interesting video, though at times hard to hear what he's saying due to the background music. But I think he's saying that "bone meal" from all those murdered 'rained back down onto the Earth'. So he thinks when people are cremated, bone fragments go up and then rain back down to the ground? Do people who live near cremation facilities in or near big cities that do a brisk business have this problem as well? Do they have to, every couple months, go out and hose off the front steps because of all the bone meal that has accumulated? And why isn't someone having this Auschwitz bone stuff tested?

There is a related tale I think in the hoax mythology of ash being pumped out of the 'fire belching' chimneys and falling from the sky, in a kind of grim snow shower, with ash falling instead. This previous story did not include actual bone fragments falling down. Spielberg's a smart guy, but he appears to believe this latest twist on this story. Little wonder...

[PotPie]

There's a common belief that the ashes of the cremated were used to pave roads in Auschwitz-Birkenau. He's just quoting it rather imprecisely, though of course the story differs from person to person anyway.

[borjastick]

Hmmmm whoever put the music on this video needs to learn about balance and priority.

Notice who is doing the interview. The one and only Wolf Blitzer arch zionist, Israel mass murdering apologist and purveyor of all 'truth' of the holocaust.

The claim that Spielberg seems to make is that he thrust his arm into the pond and found a squidgy mess of human ash etc plus of course the sand on the paths being made from human ash. All nonsense of course. Who has any other evidence for this sad story.

They love stories the jews all of which must show their struggle and victim hood. All of which must be made up and never be questioned.

[Kingfisher]

The story that the ashes were flushed into the pond goes back along way. Jacob Bronowski alleged it in the BBC series The Ascent of Man in the early seventies (at 0:25) :

[hermod]

The story that the ashes were flushed into the pond goes back along way. Jacob Bronowski alleged it in the BBC series The Ascent of Man in the early seventies (at 0:25) :

The so-called 'ash pond' is in fact a very good news for Holocaust revisionism and the pursuit of truth in general. Dumping the ashes from the cremated bodies would have been one of the best ways to preserve physical evidence through sedimentation for posterity and future research. Nothing would be easier than extrapolating the number of bodies cremated at Auschwitz-Birkenau by quantifying the amount of ashes stored in that pond and the nearby rivers. But anyway, when proved wrong, Holohoaxers - aka science evaders - would certainly reply something like 'Only a small fraction of the ashes produced there were dumped in the ash pond and the nearby rivers' or similar BS. If Holohoaxers had spent as much time looking for evidence of their claims as the time they spent trying to explain why there are no physical evidence of their their claims, most of them would be Holocaust revisionists today...

[Hektor]

The story that the ashes were flushed into the pond goes back along way. Jacob Bronowski alleged it in the BBC series The Ascent of Man in the early seventies (at 0:25) :

I looked Bronowski up on wikipedia, where he got a medium article :

Jacob Bronowski (18 January 1908 – 22 August 1974) was a British mathematician, historian of science, theatre author, poet and inventor....
During the making of The Ascent of Man, Bronowski was interviewed by the British chat show host Michael Parkinson. Parkinson later recounted that Bronowski's description of a visit to Auschwitz—Bronowski had lost many family members during the Nazi era—was one of Parkinson's most memorable interviews.

The Bronowski's, while having emigrated from Poland have, did stay in Britain. There is of course for the claim that Bronowski "had lost" anyone "in Auschwitz". It's another one of those feed'm shit and keep'm in the dark claims.

The film "Ascent of man" is a promo-documentary for Evolution (and the history of civilization and science). Obviously they couldn't resist to push the Holocaust as well. Now given that Bronowski is a scientist that dangled between several disciplines like physics and biology, what tests did he do on that supposed "ash pond". How did he know that this is human ash? Or was the claim accepted on face value?

Another interesting feature:

During the Second World War Bronowski worked in operations research for the UK's Ministry of Home Security, where he developed mathematical approaches to bombing strategy for RAF Bomber Command.

Now that's odd, does that now mean that he worked on advising the RAF on how to kill as many civilians as possible?
Apparently he didn't only study inputs of bombing, but also its outputs:

At the end of the war, Bronowski was part of a British team of scientists and civil engineers that visited Japan to document the effects of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for the purpose of studying the effects of the atomic bomb and its implications for future UK civil defence.

Now let that sink in on your mind for a while. He chose Auschwitz as a demonstration on "the dangers of science", while he had personal professional experience with the issue during his own career.

[borjastick]

He said something like 'into this pond were flushed the ashes of four million...'.

For a man of such intellect he forgot to think that day, the emotion clouded his judgement. How could four million people have been murdered, cremated and all their ashes possibly have been in that pond and invisible? It doesn't matter that the figure was subsequently reduced, at the time he thought 4m were killed. Plus of course if all their ashes were in that pond how could they be the sand beneath your feet as Spielberg claims?

[hermod]

For a man of such intellect he forgot to think that day, the emotion clouded his judgement.

Emotion, and even more his own ethnicity IMO. Perhaps his political affinities also helped 'cloud his judgement' (Was he a Zionist? No doubt about his hatred of Nazism anyway. What Jew doesn't hate Nazism?).

if all their ashes were in that pond how could they be the sand beneath your feet as Spielberg claims?

Perhaps Chosenites have the superhuman power of ubiquitousness. What do unchosen subhumans like us know about that anyway?

[Hektor]

For a man of such intellect he forgot to think that day, the emotion clouded his judgement.

Emotion, and even more his own ethnicity IMO. Perhaps his political affinities also helped 'cloud his judgement' (Was he a Zionist? No doubt about his hatred of Nazism anyway. What Jew doesn't hate Nazism?).

He served RAF bomber command and even inspected the nuke attacks on civilians in Japan.

How convenient to blame the evil Nazis of even bigger crimes than his own. Blame shifting and projection (a psychological defense mechanism) may explain his otherwise silly behavior and arguments. I noticed he mentioned the four million as well. When we point out that this is a false figure that has been shrunk meanwhile under a million by historians, aren't we always firmly told that historians knew it to be false by Holocaust proponents over and over again? Now didn't the historians tell him then that this figure was false?
Assuming he did prepare, apparently they didn't tell him about this or was he not listening to the historians?

[hermod]

He served RAF bomber command and even inspected the nuke attacks on civilians in Japan.

How convenient to blame the evil Nazis of even bigger crimes than his own. Blame shifting and projection (a psychological defense mechanism) may explain his otherwise silly behavior and arguments.

True in general. It looks like Devil Hitler finally absolved England and the US, the NWO's main darlings, of any crimes. Who has already heard, except for quite rare mentions, of the countless atrocities perpetrated by Britain and America throughout their history? Holocaustianity has engulfed the NWO's dirty background and washed its agents' hands clean. How convenient...

I noticed he mentioned the four million as well. When we point out that this is a false figure that has been shrunk meanwhile under a million by historians, aren't we always firmly told that historians knew it to be false by Holocaust proponents over and over again? Now didn't the historians tell him then that this figure was false?
Assuming he did prepare, apparently they didn't tell him about this or was he not listening to the historians?

Too bad the evidence found by British investigators in 1946 was lost in the meanwhile...


https://s25.postimg.io/q1p73dr8d/Holoca ... 1946_R.jpg

[Moderator]

We're drifting. Perhaps a separate thread is better.
Thanks, M1

[Hektor]

Perhaps start a separate thread on Jacob Bronowski (etc.). He's only relevant in relation to the excepts where he's fishing the non-existent Ash of 4.000.000 or something dead Jews from the pond.