Keith Woods' twitter-thread about how the Holocaust-narrative got legs - 1,5 million views!

[hermod]

In the past decades the attacks were indeed on nationhood, ethnicity, race, religion, authority etc. Not directly, that would provoke a response, but indirectly in the realm of ideas. Changing ideas has effects in the realms of law and social relations as well. A special target was the idea of family and about sexuality as well. The 'gospel' there was that people had to be liberated from 'repressive structures' and 'repressive morals'. That was essentially the creed of the Frankfurt School and New Left in general. An individual ethics of responsibility has been replaced with a political moralism of virtue signaling. You aren't good, because you act responsible as a person, but you are now good, because you parrot 'good slogans'.

Decreasing the birth rate, making motherhood a chore, calling fathers repressive and tell everyone that we 'need immigration' as well as 'have a duty to people that are oppressed elsewhere' does have effects over time. Decline of the Autochthones, while the number of Allochthones grows. In the process social cohesion declines as well and this even enhances of the other effects already in place.

The hashtag & slogan "Open Borders for Israel" is a key to realize or emphasize the genocidal nature of that multifront war (because it's both intentional and focused on a specific target-race) and the identity of the real perpetrators (because opposing is always called anti-Semitism).

Now there is some analytical texts available on this. But it's 'off-center', even if the authors aren't considered fringe. Solutions is even another ball game. People don't have answers, at least not sufficiently. The subject is avoided as well. Even those aware of the problems aren't really willing to engage and the cast of characters often isn't up to task neither. Those with capabilities are virtually all employed elsewhere and will be careful what to say on the subject. They deny 'a conspiracy', but are afraid of 'conspirators' at the same time... Denying this as well of course.... But they call those disputing the Holocaust "Deniers".

Solutions?!? Just suggest that it might be a problem and you're socially dead and.or physically imprisoned very shortly afterwards. Whe resistance is forbidden, you know that you're fighting the good war, against the crucial agenda of the real powerholders

[Hektor]

In the past decades the....already in place.

The hashtag & slogan "Open Borders for Israel" is a key to realize or emphasize the genocidal nature of that multifront war (because it's both intentional and focused on a specific target-race) and the identity of the real perpetrators (because opposing is always called anti-Semitism).

Now there is some analytical texts available on this. But it's 'off-center', even if the authors aren't considered fringe. Solutions is even another ball game. People don't have answers, at least not sufficiently. The subject is avoided as well. Even those aware of the problems aren't really willing to engage and the cast of characters often isn't up to task neither. Those with capabilities are virtually all employed elsewhere and will be careful what to say on the subject. They deny 'a conspiracy', but are afraid of 'conspirators' at the same time... Denying this as well of course.... But they call those disputing the Holocaust "Deniers".

Solutions?!? Just suggest that it might be a problem and you're socially dead and.or physically imprisoned very shortly afterwards. Whe resistance is forbidden, you know that you're fighting the good war, against the crucial agenda of the real powerholders

#OpenBordersForIsrael was indeed funny.
It seems 'refugees' aren't too welcome in Israel. They even have a party opposing this. When a white goy would say what those folks say, he would be a 'NAZI' (of course). But it's a closed loop system engaged in there. Displacement Migration to White countries is 'cultural enrichment' and Jews will support that... For 'Israel'.... not so much. That's different. One could actually say... Now that's their own affairs. That's if Jews weren't on the forefront of displacement migration anywhere else (as far as White countries are concerned). The strategy behind this should also be clear. Heterogenized the potentially powerful countries and you can exert control over them in the future. If they step out of line, incite riots there and protest and then exert compliance from them again. Meanwhile veil this as 'humanitarian concern' for 'poor refugees' and make it an obligation to the West to 'save all people in the world'. In the process you'll get the support from NGO's, leftist pressure group, corporate "Christianity" and whatever group of influence you can trigger to support this. The scheme is obvious, if you reflect on this... And it is due to post-WW2 redefinition of terms. And that has created a tangled web of lies.

Now in theory, hypothetically a country could decide to step out of this. But there are incentives not to do so. They don't want to forego participation in the world economy, since that has advantages for them in terms of ability to export high-valued goods and cheap imports of mass-produce and commodities... Western countries are also invested into many other countries and they don't want obstruction of their ROI in this... Naturally. Additionally they may face subversion and even military action, if they step out of line. That's what South Africa had to face in the 70s and 80s, since they were 'out of step' with the 'global trends'. After we weren't needed anymore against the Soviet block... The Americans started to drop us slowly and the 'internal strive' was increased... I should add that local elites were also into this heavily... With Jews more on a side track there. Although the Communist Party had been run by Jews and the SACP was essentially the group that managed the ANC, calling the shots on policy and determining the strategy... Also moving over to 'negotiations', when the support of the Eastern Block fell away... Ultimately it was the big bankers backing 'transition' as well.