Lydia Tischler - Survivor

[Jurgen]

This turned up in my Facebook feed.

Lydia Tischler - Holocaust Survivor

https://www.channel4.com/news/holocaust-memorial-day-auschwitz-survivor-lydia-tischler

I had to laugh, at the 2:00-2:22 mark.

"People who had been there for some time told us that we would be going to the gas chambers...so we sat there, and I must say, I sat there and didn't know if there would be water or gas. It was water."

What story are they trying to promote? Anyone with a whit of wit should pick this up. She was told she was going to the gas chamber....but water came out....how strange...

[Jurgen]

I can't find a lot about her...or anything else about her...everything leads back to the same video.

May also be known as Lydie Tischlerová?

[flimflam]

Details, even important crucial ones, do not matter in the holohoax. She survived the horror and lived to tell about it. Nothing else matters.

The most read book on the hoax is E. Wiesel's 'Night', it is assigned in schools across the country. The book recounts Wiesel's experience as a prisoner in Auschwitz for a year, when the consensus figure is that the Nazis were killing 10,000 Jews per day in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. Yet in his book Wiesel does not mention gas chambers, and does mentions taking a shower in six separate places in the book, and describes being dunked in a vat of disinfectant (note: you used to be able to see this on Amazon using the 'Look inside the book' feature and searching for shower, but I see they've discontinued that feature, too bad, it was a very good one) prior to the shower on at least one occasion. But it gets even better .. Wiesel says that the Nazis killed the Jews by tossing them alive into burning pits, one for adults, one for children. This is absurd for several reasons, and beyond that ! it contradicts the hoax. So, the most promoted and most widely read book is in flat contradiction to the hoax narrative on the method of killing no less.

On page 4 the book contains the line ...'Infants were tossed into the air and used as targets for the machine guns.' which is over the top absurd for several reasons. No problem for the hoax.

There is an incredible book, 'Reading the Holocaust', written by Inga Clendinnen, a distinguished Australian writer and historian, with a long list of awards and honors. She explains in the book that the 'survivors' made up their stories, but that it doesn't matter! From the book ...

"We have to train our ignorant ears to hear those communiques from the underworld. The voices we will hear find their context within a vast silence: the multitude of the dead. It is almost impossible to fathom the depth of the silence, to remember that behind the shoulder of every individual who survived the camps stand a thousand who did not."

More on the book here .... http://www.holohoax101.org/102/

[Zulu]

Details, even important crucial ones, do not matter in the holohoax. She survived the horror and lived to tell about it. Nothing else matters.

In 1954 French scholar Germaine Tillion analyzed the "gratuitous lie"
with regard to the German concentration camps. She wrote:

Those persons [who gratuitously lie] are, to tell the truth, much
more numerous than people generally suppose, and a subject like that
of the concentration camp world -- well designed, alas, to stimulate
sado-masochistic imaginings -- offered them an exceptional field of
action. We have known numerous mentally damaged persons, half
swindlers and half fools, who exploited an imaginary deportation; we
have known others of them -- authentic deportees -- whose sick minds
strove to go even beyond the monstrosities that they had seen or that
people said had happened to them. There have been publishers to print
some of their imaginings, and more or less official compilations to
use them, but publishers and compilers are absolutely inexcusable,
since the most elementary inquiry would have been enough to reveal the
imposture.

"Le Système concentrationnaire allemand [1940-1944]," Revue d'histoire
de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, July 1954, p. 18, n. 2.

http://www.amazon.fr/dhistoire-deuxieme ... B0000DWO36

[Hannover]

Details, even important crucial ones, do not matter in the holohoax. She survived the horror and lived to tell about it. Nothing else matters.

Proof? The fraudulent storyline needs no proof.

i.e.:

"One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."

- endorsed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5205

and:

"During the research for a Sunday Times inquiry into Gray's work, M. Gallo informed me coolly that he 'needed' a long chapter on Treblinka because the book required something strong for pulling in readers. When I myself told Gray, the 'author', that he had manifestly never been to, nor escaped from Treblinka, he finally asked, despairingly, "But does it matter? Wasn't the only thing that Treblinka did happen, that it should be written about, and that some Jews should be shown to have been heroic?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Gray_(writer)

- Hannover

Holocaust Tours
Return flights from London, first class rail, 4 star hotels, buffet breakfast, 3-course dinner with drinks each evening, all entrance fees and expert guide throughout.
Guide : Dr Waitman Beorn
Tour price: £2095.00
Single supplement: £245.00
Deposit: £200.00
Price without flights: £1945.00
Selling fast !
http://www.theculturalexperience.com/to ... ca4ef8f90c

[Jurgen]

That's incredible! How on Gods good green earth can these people be taken seriously?

[flimflam]

Proof? The fraudulent storyline needs no proof.

Cotton Mather describing the Salem witch trials - 'There was little occasion to prove the witchcraft, it being evident and notorious to all beholders'.

[hermod]

Hey, don't blame grandma Tischler for this. The cross-pollination of BS has never generated credible stories after all...



And don't blame Stevie either. He did the best he could do with the ludicrous testimonial 'evidence' available.