New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Lamprecht » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:46 am)

Zolton wrote:
Lamprecht wrote:
A situation in which the killer intends only to inflict serious bodily harm, knowing this could result in death but with no specific intent to kill, also constitutes second-degree murder.

There was no intention to inflict serious bodily harm. At best it's involuntary manslaughter, but I can't even say that. Consider that these are legal terms. These are all classifications of unlawful homicide. If I kill someone in self defense, it is never "murder" or "manslaughter" because it's lawful.


Killing someone and calling it "euthanasia" does not make it so. The "euthanasia" that revisionists claim happened at Treblinka was first degree murder, plain and simple. The deaths that revisionists claim occurred on the trains en route to Treblinka was second degree murder, plain and simple.

"Depraved-heart murder", in which the killer has no specific intent to inflict harm but knowingly commits acts with a high probability of causing death or serious harm, demonstrating a malignant indifference to human life, is typically second-degree murder.


I just love how revisionists constantly shoot themselves in the foot. (They're not known as the sharpest tools in the shed.)

It can only be murder if it's unlawful
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
HeiligeSturm
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Location: Euro-Zion

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby HeiligeSturm » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 1:14 pm)

Franz Suchomel tells how some Jews commited suicide on the way to Treblinka.

"Franz Suchomel was secretly recorded during an interview for the documentary film Shoah, directed by Claude Lanzmann and released in 1985."
"During the interview at the Hotel Post in Braunau am Inn"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Suchomel

Franz Suchomel: "So that while 5,000 Jews arrived in Treblinka,"
3,000 were dead."
Claude Lanzmann: "In the...(?)
Franz Suchomel: "In the cars.
They had slashed their wrists, or just died."

(Shoah, 1985)

Franz Suchomel 1.png
Franz Suchomel 2.png

Franz Suchomel, conveniently, has a printed map of Treblinka in his hotel room.
This is probably just in case if someone might visit him and ask things about Treblinka.
Franz Suchomel 3.png
Franz Suchomel 4.png

In a schoolmaster-like manner he points to the map with his pointer
while he describes the criminal activities in Treblinka.
Franz Suchomel 5.jpg

In this secretly filmed sequence, the camera follows neatly his presentation with some nice zooms
and several times he glances straight towards the camera. Is it worthy of 500DM, I'll leave to you.

There is another problem in this secretly filmed interview. The supposed location.
Hotel Post in Shoah (1985).jpg

"During the interview at the Hotel Post in Braunau am Inn"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Suchomel
"in secret at the Hotel Post in April 1976"
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn1004727

There is Hotel Post in Braunau am Inn. It is located in Stadtplatz 10, Braunau am Inn.
It looks like this:
Hotel Post Stadtpl. 10 5280 Braunau am Inn Österreich.jpg


Hotel Post in Shoah (1985) – licence plate.jpg

So, this is not Hotel Post in Braunau am Inn?
Too bad the address is too blurry but it's not Hotel Post.
But you can see the licence plate.

K=Cologne (Köln)
https://www.customeuropeanplates.com/ge ... late-codes

Köln (Cologne) is approximately 681,1 km away from Braunau am Inn.
"Surprisingly, however, in the book [Schlomo] Venezia does not describe it at all: he
does not indicate its size, its location in the building..."
- C. Mattogno: Sonderkommando III

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Hektor » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 2:21 pm)

Indeed, good case to be made that Suchomehl actually knew he was being filmed. That indicates that Lanzmann did indeed arrange to get testimony that was in favor of the Holocaust narrative. On the other hand. I'm grateful he made that movie. Too much material that is compromising for the Holocaust Myth. And well... One can analyze the stories.

User avatar
HeiligeSturm
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Location: Euro-Zion

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby HeiligeSturm » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:04 pm)

Hektor wrote:Indeed, good case to be made that Suchomehl actually knew he was being filmed.

It is even possible that he was filmed with the money he received. He checks something from his breast pocket.
It sounds like paper and could be envelope. Or he just forgot his lines.
Franz Suchomel money 1.jpg
Franz Suchomel money 2.jpg
Franz Suchomel money 3.jpg

Franz Suchomel: I'll come to that later, it's a story in itself.
Claude Lanzmann: Yes, it's a story in itself.
Franz Suchomel: It's a story in itself.
Claude Lanzmann: Yes, I know.

Hektor wrote:That indicates that Lanzmann did indeed arrange to get testimony that was in favor of the Holocaust narrative.


He admitted it:
"lui ai-je expliqué. Et puis, j'ai payé. Une somme pas mince. Je les ai tous payés, les Allemands"
"I explained to him. And then I paid. A considerable amount. I paid them all, the Germans"


Claude Lanzmann explique "Shoah" à des élèves avant sa distribution dans les lycées
Le Monde Publié le 15 septembre 2004
https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article ... 19218.html

"It was my idea to pay them. And if I hadn't paid them, I couldn't have done it.
They loved money, yes."

Claude Lanzmann in Spectres of the Shoah.


Hektor wrote:On the other hand. I'm grateful he made that movie. Too much material that is compromising for the Holocaust Myth. And well... One can analyze the stories.

I agree. I'm doing a in depth analysis of Shoah with all possible sources.
But Shoah itself is already plentiful. This Suchomel interview inter-cut is interesting.
Franz Suchomel Van intercut.jpg

Whoever is in the screen, he is not Suchomel.
Franz Suchomel Van guys.jpg

All you have to do is compare the background in Suchomel interview with this one.
This is one Spectre of Shoah.
Without going too far off topic, I have to point out that Lanzmann's documentary is ridden with dishonesty and staged events.
"Surprisingly, however, in the book [Schlomo] Venezia does not describe it at all: he
does not indicate its size, its location in the building..."
- C. Mattogno: Sonderkommando III

Zolton
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Zolton » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:54 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:
Zolton wrote:
Lamprecht wrote:There was no intention to inflict serious bodily harm. At best it's involuntary manslaughter, but I can't even say that. Consider that these are legal terms. These are all classifications of unlawful homicide. If I kill someone in self defense, it is never "murder" or "manslaughter" because it's lawful.


Killing someone and calling it "euthanasia" does not make it so. The "euthanasia" that revisionists claim happened at Treblinka was first degree murder, plain and simple. The deaths that revisionists claim occurred on the trains en route to Treblinka was second degree murder, plain and simple.

"Depraved-heart murder", in which the killer has no specific intent to inflict harm but knowingly commits acts with a high probability of causing death or serious harm, demonstrating a malignant indifference to human life, is typically second-degree murder.


I just love how revisionists constantly shoot themselves in the foot. (They're not known as the sharpest tools in the shed.)

It can only be murder if it's unlawful


Those Jews who were killed in the euthanasia program that revisionists claim was carried out in Treblinka; Did they consent to being "euthanized"?

Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Did they voluntarily assume any risks to being transported under the conditions that revisionists claim they had to endure?

Did they volunteer to be transported to the labor camps that revisionists claim existed along the route to Treblinka?

Did they voluntarily agree to perform the labor that revisionists claim they performed at these camps?

What happened to those who refused to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

What happened to those who were unable to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?

What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Lamprecht » 5 months 1 week ago (Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:17 pm)

Zolton wrote:Those Jews who were killed in the euthanasia program that revisionists claim was carried out in Treblinka; Did they consent to being "euthanized"?

Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Did they voluntarily assume any risks to being transported under the conditions that revisionists claim they had to endure?

Did they volunteer to be transported to the labor camps that revisionists claim existed along the route to Treblinka?

Did they voluntarily agree to perform the labor that revisionists claim they performed at these camps?

What happened to those who refused to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

What happened to those who were unable to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?

What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?

Not playing the 6 million questions game. For a homicide to be "murder" it must be unlawful. Forced labor (involuntary servitude) is not even illegal the USA if it is in response to a convicted crime. If you are going to claim it is unlawful, please explain precisely what law was being broken here, and under what authority.
Further, using your "logic" any conscripted soldier that died in a war was killed by their own government.
Euthanasia of the terminally ill / frail may be seen as morally reprehensible, but I would counter that euthanizing them actually might have saved lives other in the long run, as they generally had lowered immune function and would be more likely to contract and spread disease to others. Further, they would have taken up additional food/water/medicine that could have been used by the more healthy prisoners.
It is a bit ridiculous to call this "murder" and then turn around and pretend as if the abortion of millions of healthy fetuses is somehow not murder.
Remember that this was during a war, the deadliest in history. One could also argue that these measures were a response to the war-time conditions that were imposed by the Western "allies" that refused to accept any of the various peace proposals.
Consider that the British refused to allow food aid from the USA through the naval starvation blockade.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

Zolton
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Zolton » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:25 am)

Lamprecht wrote:
Zolton wrote:Those Jews who were killed in the euthanasia program that revisionists claim was carried out in Treblinka; Did they consent to being "euthanized"?

Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Did they voluntarily assume any risks to being transported under the conditions that revisionists claim they had to endure?

Did they volunteer to be transported to the labor camps that revisionists claim existed along the route to Treblinka?

Did they voluntarily agree to perform the labor that revisionists claim they performed at these camps?

What happened to those who refused to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

What happened to those who were unable to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?

What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?

Not playing the 6 million questions game. For a homicide to be "murder" it must be unlawful. Forced labor (involuntary servitude) is not even illegal the USA if it is in response to a convicted crime. If you are going to claim it is unlawful, please explain precisely what law was being broken here, and under what authority.
Further, using your "logic" any conscripted soldier that died in a war was killed by their own government.
Euthanasia of the terminally ill / frail may be seen as morally reprehensible, but I would counter that euthanizing them actually might have saved lives other in the long run, as they generally had lowered immune function and would be more likely to contract and spread disease to others. Further, they would have taken up additional food/water/medicine that could have been used by the more healthy prisoners.
It is a bit ridiculous to call this "murder" and then turn around and pretend as if the abortion of millions of healthy fetuses is somehow not murder.
Remember that this was during a war, the deadliest in history. One could also argue that these measures were a response to the war-time conditions that were imposed by the Western "allies" that refused to accept any of the various peace proposals.
Consider that the British refused to allow food aid from the USA through the naval starvation blockade.


Look at the revisionist dodge! He's clalling 10 questions 6 million! :lol:

"Forced labor (involuntary servitude) is not even illegal the USA if it is in response to a convicted crime."

:lol: Are we talking about people who were charged, tried and convicted of a crime? If you don't think transporting someone against their will to a place they didn't want to go and forcing them at gun point to do labor they did not volunteer to do is unlawfull, let's see you do it to someone in your neighborhood. Go abduct someone at gunpoint and make them rake your yard or shovel your driveway for free and tell us all what happens.

"Further, using your "logic" any conscripted soldier that died in a war was killed by their own government."

What kind of retard could compare being drafted into the military with what revisionists claim happened to the Jews during WW II? :lol:

"Further, they would have taken up additional food/water/medicine that could have been used by the more healthy prisoners
It is a bit ridiculous to call this "murder" and then turn around and pretend as if the abortion of millions of healthy fetuses is somehow not murder."

:lol: When did I mention abortion? :lol:

And tell me, where is "euthanizing" someone against their will lawfull? This link should help you answer that:


The Right To Be Murdered: Is Euthanasia the New Buzzword?

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/12/30/dying-with-dignity.aspx


Oh, and stop dodging:

Those Jews who were killed in the euthanasia program that revisionists claim was carried out in Treblinka; Did they consent to being "euthanized"?

Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Did they voluntarily assume any risks to being transported under the conditions that revisionists claim they had to endure?

Did they volunteer to be transported to the labor camps that revisionists claim existed along the route to Treblinka?

Did they voluntarily agree to perform the labor that revisionists claim they performed at these camps?

What happened to those who refused to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

What happened to those who were unable to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?

What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?

User avatar
Lamprecht
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Lamprecht » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:37 am)

Note that the troll has dodged:
If you are going to claim it is unlawful, please explain precisely what law was being broken here, and under what authority.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
— Herbert Spencer


NOTE: I am taking a leave of absence from revisionism to focus on other things. At this point, the ball is in their court to show the alleged massive pits full of human remains at the so-called "extermination camps." After 8 decades they still refuse to do this. I wonder why...

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 5168
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Hektor » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 1:46 am)

Lamprecht wrote:...
Not playing the 6 million questions game. For a homicide to be "murder" it must be unlawful. Forced labor (involuntary servitude) is not even illegal the USA if it is in response to a convicted crime. If you are going to claim it is unlawful, please explain precisely what law was being broken here, and under what authority.
Further, using your "logic" any conscripted soldier that died in a war was killed by their own government.
Euthanasia of the terminally ill / frail may be seen as morally reprehensible, but I would counter that euthanizing them actually might have saved lives other in the long run, as they generally had lowered immune function and would be more likely to contract and spread disease to others. Further, they would have taken up additional food/water/medicine that could have been used by the more healthy prisoners.
It is a bit ridiculous to call this "murder" and then turn around and pretend as if the abortion of millions of healthy fetuses is somehow not murder.
Remember that this was during a war, the deadliest in history. One could also argue that these measures were a response to the war-time conditions that were imposed by the Western "allies" that refused to accept any of the various peace proposals.
Consider that the British refused to allow food aid from the USA through the naval starvation blockade.


Indeed an issue and used to muddy the waters in debate. It is simply presumed that deportation and detention of Jews was unlawful. Well, with that argument you can you can declare almost any governmental action to be unlawful. Given that they legislate, coerce and also extract wealth from people.

After WW2 it seems as if all the governments in the world have come together and scape goat the then defunct NS-government. It's a bit like calling "stop the thief", while busy stealing. All governments use force and they actually do so for self-serving reasons. They use their power to extract wealth from people (taxation). They also expropriate straight away, if they deem it necessary. They detain people and will also use violence, if they deem it necessary. The NS-government wasn't different in this regard than any other government.

Notably the Allies did also kill people, detain people and extract wealth, when they occupied Germany. They just reserved the right to them not to be critiqued harshly for it. They did do so by accusing the NS-government of all kinds of atrocious behavior and it actually shielded them from critique effectively until today.

As for Euthanasia, what do people think happens in hospital once a patient on life support consuming vast resources will actually not be profitable anymore for the hospital? If Euthanasia is illegal, they simply camouflage what they are doing in some way. And we aren't even talking about the abortion issue. That is legal in many countries. And it deals with otherwise healthy unborn. They would just be in the way of some selfish endeavors of people. E.g. their careers or their ability to party 7 days a week.

User avatar
Nazgul
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2022 2:38 am

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Nazgul » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:17 am)

Zolton wrote:
Lamprecht wrote:
What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?
I suspect that this is a set up for infinite regression of possibilities. Here is a witness statement from Miss X, Häftlinge in den Zwangsarbeitslagern für Juden. This is typical.
When towards the end of the war the Russian army had advanced to within hearing distance of our camp, I and a number of other girls made our escape. This was not difficult, as by that time the guards were already demoralised and hardly tried to maintain control Miss X.
“Those who play with the devil's toys will be brought by degrees to wield his sword” R. Buckminster Fuller, 1895

User avatar
HeiligeSturm
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 1:57 pm
Location: Euro-Zion

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby HeiligeSturm » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:18 pm)

Zolton wrote:Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?


Most of us know about The Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor (Nuremberg Laws).
There was other laws too.
USHMM has many opinionated articles about those laws in their website.

Anyway, during the WWII, many laws made it legal to imprison people and transport them involuntary to places like concentration camps.
The Germans were not the only ones who made these kind of laws.
One is US President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066.

"Executive Order 9066 was signed in 1942, making this movement official government policy.
The order suspended the writ of habeas corpus and denied Japanese Americans their rights
under the Fifth Amendment, which states that no person shall be deprived of life,
liberty or property without due process. Roosevelt justified the order on the grounds of military necessity,
declaring that Japanese Americans were a threat to national security."


This in the Land of Liberty. Let's continue.

"Anti-Japanese sentiments had been developing in the U.S. long before WWII had even begun.
To most Americans in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century,
all Asian immigrants posed a threat to the American standard of living
and to the racial integrity of the nation
.
“These attitudes were not seen as racist at the time, but simply American”"


This is familiar story but the nation is different.

"Franklin Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 which initiated the confinement of the
Japanese Americans into concentration camps.
The term “concentration camp”, initially used to describe Japanese living quarters
later became discontinued after the discovery of Nazi camps in Europe.
Forced to sell their homes and businesses at great losses,
Japanese Americans were compelled to move into areas that initially had very little to support them.
The poorly constructed camps were surrounded by barbed wire and were heavily guarded by troops
who had guns pointed at the Japanese internees, undoubtedly,
a strikingly similar arrangement to the Jewish concentration camps in Europe. "


Did the Japanese Americans willingly move or go to transports? No. Was it lawful? Yes.

"Through a series of proclamations beginning in 1942, Japanese-Americans were officially labeled “enemy aliens”"

This and other measures made it legal.

Source for quoted sections:
https://www.dartmouth.edu/~hist32/Histo ... 66%20(1942).htm

==========================
Now let us rail back to Treblinka.

Vasily Grossman was a chemical engineer before coming a full-time writer.
At some point his writings made him kind of a nonperson.
He was nearly labelled as "enemy of the people" for his anti-Soviet writings.
His apartment was raided by KGB as he was subject of state persecution.

Before this he wrote how Josef Hirtreiter was able to tear children in half when he was stationed at Treblinka.
After describing Hirtreiter's appearance, Grossman continued to write about "cyclops, creatures with two heads, as well as the corresponding terrible spiritual monstrosities and perversities." (I wonder why Claude Lanzmann didn't interview Josef Hirtreiter.)

"Grossman's description of a physically unlikely method of killing a living human through
tearing-by-hand originated from the 1944 memoir of the Treblinka revolt survivor Jankiel Wiernik,
where the phrase to "tear the child in half" appeared for the first time.
Wiernik himself never worked in the Auffanglager receiving area of the camp where Hirtreiter served,
and so was repeating hearsay."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Gr ... _Treblinka


On the page 267 of A Writer At War: Vasily Grossman with the Red Army 1941-1945
(Translated from Russian language by Anthony Beevor & Ljuba Vinogradova)
Vasily Grossman mentions a chamber of moving knives under one these gas chambers disguised as bathhouses.
On the same page Grossman tells there was "a pond full of acid".

Vasily Grossman wrote: "then I came to believe that what I had heard was true"

Yad Vashem tells:
"In 1944 Grossman entered the Nazi camps of Majdanek and Treblinka, which had just been liberated by the Red Army."
This cannot be true as Treblinka was claimed to be razed to the ground by the Nazis.

"A Jew himself, he undertook the faithful recording of Holocaust atrocities in the Ukraine, at Odessa and Majdanek as their extent dawned. His supremely powerful report ‘The Hell of Treblinka’ was quoted at the Nuremberg tribunal."
https://www.antonybeevor.com/book/a-wri ... 1941-1945/

After WWII, Grossman was banned to publish his writings (he was not the only one).
Somehow (maybe because of his earlier work and position?) he avoided the usual treatment of anti-Soviet (non)persons:

"An "enemy of the people" could be imprisoned, expelled or executed, and lose their property to confiscation.
Close relatives of enemies of the people were labeled as "traitor of Motherland family members" and prosecuted.
They could be sent to Gulag, punished by the involuntary settlement in unpopulated areas,
or stripped of citizen's rights.
Being a friend of an enemy of the people automatically placed the person under suspicion."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_ ... ist_states
"Surprisingly, however, in the book [Schlomo] Venezia does not describe it at all: he
does not indicate its size, its location in the building..."
- C. Mattogno: Sonderkommando III

User avatar
hermod
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2919
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby hermod » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:45 pm)

Zolton wrote:Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?


Yes, it's lawful. It was lawful according to the laws passed by the German government of that time. And don't make as if Jews hadn't been forcibly expelled hundreds of times from dozens of places throughout history. Removing Jews from a given territory was as ordinary (not to say usual) as possible. Moreover mandatory population transfers were practiced quite often back then. After WWI, around 2 million Greeks and Turks were forced to move out and resettle in the newly-established Greek and Turkish states. That large population transfer even inspired the Zionists of those days. Resettling millions of Jews in Palestine and deporting most indigenous Arabs out of Palestine was at the core of their program and the big Greek-Turkish population transfer of the 1920s made them feel that their scheme was feasible. Not to mention the 12-15 million ethnic Germans brutally expelled from Eastern Europe at the end of WWII...

About forced labor, the Jews of Germany and German-occupied Europe were regarded as citizens of an enemy nation at war with the Third Reich. No surprise. Chaim Weizmann and a number of his Zionist colleagues had unambiguously stated several times that all the Jews were citizens of the Jewish nation at war with the Third Reich. You can't blame the leaders of the Third Reich for listening to the acknowledged spokesmen of the Jewish people and for treating Jews accordingly (i.e. as prisoners forced to perform some labor during the war). Most young able-bodied were busy elsewhere, fighting the Jews' second world war, after all.

Image


Image


Image
"[Austen Chamberlain] has done western civilization a great service by refuting at least one of the slanders against the Germans
because a civilization which leaves war lies unchallenged in an atmosphere of hatred and does not produce courage in its leaders to refute them
is doomed.
"

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, on the public admission by Britain's Foreign Secretary that the WWI corpse-factory story was false, December 4, 1925

Zolton
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Zolton » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:40 pm)

Lamprecht wrote:Note that the troll has dodged:
If you are going to claim it is unlawful, please explain precisely what law was being broken here, and under what authority.


According to revisionists, Jews died by the thousands, if not tens of thousands, while being transported east towards Treblinka due to inhumane conditions in the trains, and by the hundreds, if not thousands, in a "euthanasia" program while in the Treblinka camp itself.

If you want to pretend that what revisionists claim happened to the Jews in this situation was not second degree murder, which includes:

"Depraved-heart murder", in which the killer has no specific intent to inflict harm but knowingly commits acts with a high probability of causing death or serious harm, demonstrating a malignant indifference to human life, is typically second-degree murder."

Or third degree murder:

"Whoever, without intent to effect the death of any person, causes the death of another by perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life, is guilty of murder in the third degree."

Then so be it. Of course you can play mental gymnastics games with yourself; that's why you're called deniers.

The devil is in the details. Tell us what those details were:

Those Jews who were killed in the euthanasia program that revisionists claim was carried out in Treblinka; Did they consent to being "euthanized"?

Those Jews who died by the thousands while being transported east toward Treblinka, like revisionists claim; Did they willingly board those trains?

Did they voluntarily assume any risks to being transported under the conditions that revisionists claim they had to endure?

Did they volunteer to be transported to the labor camps that revisionists claim existed along the route to Treblinka?

Did they voluntarily agree to perform the labor that revisionists claim they performed at these camps?

What happened to those who refused to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

What happened to those who were unable to go along with this revisionist claimed fact?

Is forcing people to board trains, transporting them against their will to places they didn't agree to go to, forcing them to do labor that they did not voluntarily agree to do and transporting them under conditions that could foreseeably cause injury and death (all things that revisionists claim happened) lawful?

What happened to the Jews after they performed labor at these labor camps like revisionists insist they did?

Where did they go?


Do you also claim that those Nazis who, according to revisionists, killed Jews in the "euthanasia program" at Treblinka, were only guilty of "at best involuntary manslaughter"?

How well did the defense of "it was lawful" to kill Jews work for the Nazis at Nuremberg?

To determine if the euthanasia program at Treblinka was lawful or not, whether it was murder or not, please explain how the Nazis killed Jews at Treblinka. It is the revisionist claim after all.

Zolton
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Zolton » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:45 pm)

Butterfangers wrote:
Zolton wrote:I think Thomas Kues would wholeheartedly agree with this new revisionist hypothesis. I think these new research findings corroborate his own.

Thomas Kues might also put his weener in a light socket. Does him [possibly] agreeing with anything here add credibility to such an act?


It looks to me like revisionists generally support his claims:

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6838&p=49578&hilit=thomas+kues+holocaust+by+train#p49578

Zolton
Member
Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: New research uncovers strong evidence that Jews were murdered BEFORE they reached Treblinka

Postby Zolton » 5 months 1 week ago (Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:59 pm)

Otium:

Yet there's no reason nor proof of intentional and systematic mass murder dictated by some programme.


If the eastward bound Jews were not murdered at the camps that revisionists claim they were dropped off at on the way to Treblinka, then where did they go? Are revisionists now claiming the Nazie just let them go free after doing some labor at the camp?

Otium:

Of course murder could occur, and probably did in such circumstances


But revisionists deny this by claiming it wasn't murder, just "involuntary manslaughter at best."

Maybe if I asked it this way:

If the Jews who were offloaded to camps along the Treblinka route were not "involuntary manslaughtered" at those camps, then where did they go?


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Archie, hermod and 24 guests